Latest topics
» POOFness for SEPT 20: RELEASE AND STUFF such as internet donation swindle
Yesterday at 11:57 pm by robert18

» Puerto Rico ~ Updates & Aftermath
Yesterday at 10:58 pm by PurpleSkyz

» This Weeks Scamtastic RV/GCR News: 9/16-9/22
Yesterday at 6:43 pm by mefireball7

» Crop Circles Actually Being Formed In Seconds By Spheres Caught On Camera
Yesterday at 6:25 pm by PurpleSkyz

» THE DARK SIDE OF LIGHT; Amorous Memoirs of a Former Trial Lawyer
Yesterday at 5:01 pm by Count Of Arran

» Lady Gaga: Fibromyalgia Is ‘Punishment’ For Joining The Illuminati
Yesterday at 3:06 pm by PurpleSkyz

» UPDATES ~ Hurricane Maria
Yesterday at 2:27 pm by PurpleSkyz

» The GoldFish Report No 132 Scott Werner M.D. Returns with Winston Shrout : Addiction & Vaccinations
Yesterday at 2:25 pm by PurpleSkyz

» BLACK LODGE - Prayer Song
Yesterday at 1:54 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» Entirely New Communication Channels Conducting Light Found in the Brain
Yesterday at 12:05 pm by PurpleSkyz

» NIBIRU News ~ Has'NASA warned Planet Xon a Straight Trajectory with Earth? plus MORE
Yesterday at 11:52 am by PurpleSkyz

» The Free Individual is greater than the State by Jon Rappoport
Yesterday at 11:47 am by PurpleSkyz

» Again Strange Lights Appear In The Sky During Massive Earthquake In Mexico
Yesterday at 11:44 am by PurpleSkyz

» Next court Hearing for HATJ and RKB
Yesterday at 11:34 am by PurpleSkyz

» UFO News ~ Unknown Flying Object Photo Taken over Devon, England plus MORE
Yesterday at 11:10 am by PurpleSkyz

» Cindy Kay Currier ~ "Rules phobia" & lack of shared values
Yesterday at 11:01 am by PurpleSkyz

» Benjamin Fulford Responds To Anna Von Reitz - September 19, 2017
Yesterday at 7:58 am by MartyM

» The Orchestrated Financial Fall of America and the World
Yesterday at 7:54 am by MartyM

» Bill Gates Funding MIT Development of Micro Implants to Automatically Give Babies Vaccines
Yesterday at 1:17 am by PurpleSkyz

» War… by Visionkeeper
Yesterday at 1:13 am by PurpleSkyz

Who is online?

You are not connected. Please login or register

Out Of Mind » PEOPLE MAKING AN IMPACT ON THE LEGAL STATUS QUO » SNOOP 4 TRUTH » ROD CLASS & "SEVENTH GRADE CIVICS EXPLAINED" plus more

ROD CLASS & "SEVENTH GRADE CIVICS EXPLAINED" plus more

View previous topic View next topic Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

snoop4truth


BACKGROUND: Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists are unable to distinguish between PLURAL terms and SINGULAR terms. This inability results in much of their confusion about the law. In a republican form of government, such as ours, "WE" (a PLURAL term) the "PEOPLE" (also a PLURAL term) exercise our power and control over our own government COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY). But, as INDIVIDUALS, we exercise no such power or control. In a republican form of government, such as ours, the authority of a government depends on the COLLECTIVE (not INDIVIDUAL) "consent" of the "governed" (a PLURAL term). But, as INDIVIDUALS, our "consent" to our government, its jurisdiction or to our laws IS NOT REQUIRED. (See links at bottom.).  

CIVICS: In a republican form of government such as ours, there are THREE BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT. This prevents tyranny from any single branch of government. This legal principle is called the "SEPARATION OF POWERS DOCTRINE" which is found in the constitution of every state and in the constitution of the United States. Our three branches of government are the ELECTED LEGISLATIVE branch (the ELECTED statutory law makers), the ELECTED EXECUTIVE branch (the ELECTED law enforcement officials and their appointees) and the ELECTED JUDICIAL branch (the ELECTED judges,  the ELECTED prosecutors and the ELECTED public defenders of the courts). Through the ELECTION process, "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) control ALL THREE BRANCHES of our own government. But, as INDIVIDUALS, we have no such control.

In a republican form of government such as ours, if "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) do not like our state statutes, then "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) have the power and ability to ELECT DIFFERENT ELECTED state LEGISLATIVE REPRESENTATIVES to change or repeal the state statutes that we do not like. This ELECTION process works the same way with our nationally ELECTED LEGISLATORS (SENATORS and CONGRESS MEN & WOMEN) as well as our locally ELECTED law/ordinance makers (county commissioners, city commissioners and city council members, etc.).  

In a republican form of government such as ours, if "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) do not like our ELECTED state law enforcement officials, their appointees or their practices, then "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) have the power and ability to ELECT DIFFERENT state ELECTED LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS to change the appointees and/or practices that we do not like (different Governor, different County Sheriffs, different City Police Chiefs, etc.). This ELECTION process works the same way with our nationally ELECTED law enforcement officer (our PRESIDENT ). 

In a republican form of government such as ours, if "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) do not like our ELECTED state judges, their practices or their rulings , then "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) have the power and ability to ELECT different ELECTED state JUDGES (different Supreme Court Justices, different appellate judges, different circuit judges, different county judges, different city judges, etc.). This ELECTION process works the same way with respect to our ELECTED state prosecutors (state attorneys and district attorneys) and our ELECTED state public defenders. NOTE: In the federal courts, judges are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate, both of which are ELECTED by "We the People". But, those ELECTED representatives of "We the People" (who do the nominating and confirming of our federal judges) can be removed from office by the ELECTION process as well. The ELECTED President also appoints the federal prosecutors, but the President can be removed from office by the ELECTION process too. Some state jurisdictions even use a combination of BOTH systems whereby judges are first APPOINTED to the bench by ELECTED representatives of "We the People", but then must withstand a "retention" vote by "We the People" every single ELECTION cycle thereafter in order to remain on the bench. 

Regardless, EVERY single person in EVERY single branch of our STATE and FEDERAL government is put into office DIRECTLY or INDIRECTLY by "We the People" COLLECTIVELY through the ELECTION process.

The fundamental mistake made by ALL AMATEUR LEGAL THEORISTS is their inability to comprehend the difference between the power of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (which is almost absolute) and the ABSENCE of power of the SINGLE INDIVIDUAL (which is almost nothing) when opposing the power of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (which is almost absolute). Every single amateur legal theory ever promoted reflects a basic misunderstanding of this simple legal principle, "THE MAJORITY RULES and the INDIVIDUAL DOES NOT." All amateur legal theorists get this simple legal principle exactly BACKWARDS (a common problem in amateur legal theory). 

It is the power of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) that empowers our ELECTED state LAW MAKERS to pass our state statutes and to make them binding upon all of the INDIVIDUALS in the state without the INDIVIDUAL'S "consent" (“contractual” or otherwise), etc.

It is the power of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) that empowers our ELECTED state LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS to ticket, arrest and charge any INDIVIDUAL in the state who violates our state statutes without the INDIVIDUAL'S "consent" (“contractual” or otherwise), etc.

It is the power of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) that empowers our ELECTED state JUDGES to preside over state court proceedings of such an INDIVIDUAL without that INDIVIDUAL’S "consent" (“contractual or otherwise”).

This means that in a republican form of government such as ours, an INDIVIDUAL'S "consent” (“contractual” or otherwise) is NOT REQUIRED in such matters. But, even if some type of "consent" was required in such matters (and it is not), then in a republican form of government such as ours, THAT “CONSENT” WOULD COME FROM “WE THE PEOPLE” COLLECTIVELY, AS A WHOLE, THROUGH THE ELECTION PROCESS, NOT FROM THE SINGLE INDIVIDUAL OUTSIDE THE ELECTION PROCESS.

THROUGH THE ELECTION PROCESS, OUR THREE BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT ALREADY HAVE THE COLLECTIVE “CONSENT” OF “WE THE PEOPLE” TO MAKE OUR LAW, TO ENFORCE OUR LAW AND TO PUNISH FOR VIOLATIONS OF OUR LAW.

OUR THREE BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT DO NOT ALSO NEED THE INDIVIDUAL “CONSENT” OF ANY INDIVIDUAL TO CARRY OUT THOSE FUNCTIONS. 

So, every single legal burden placed on the INDIVIDUAL in a republican form of government such as ours is a legal burden that is placed upon the INDIVIDUAL directly or indirectly by the majority of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY through the ELECTION process.

In a republican form of government such as ours, the power of the INDIVIDUAL is limited to VOTING, RUNNING FOR OFFICE and to enforcing what few INDIVIDUAL rights and protections that "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) allow the INDIVIDUAL to have (such as those INDIVIDUAL rights and protections listed in the Bill Of Rights). In a republican form of government such as ours, these INDIVIDUAL rights and protections of the INDIVIDUAL are determined by the majority of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (NOT BY THE INDIVIDUAL). This is why in a republican form of government, such as ours, ELECTIONS ARE SO IMPORTANT. In a republican form of government such as ours, ELECTIONS (which reflect the will of the majority of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY) DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY CONTROL EVERYTHING ABOUT OUR OWN GOVERNMENT. THESE ELECTIONS DETERMINE WHAT OUR LAWS ARE, WHO OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS ARE, WHO OUR JUDGES ARE, WHO OUR PROSECUTORS ARE, WHO OUR PUBLIC DEFENDERS ARE AND THEY DETERMINE WHAT ANY DESIRED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS OR REPEALS MIGHT BE.

FACT: THESE ELECTIONS BY "WE THE PEOPLE" MAKE OUR STATUTES VALID. THESE ELECTIONS BY "WE THE PEOPLE" MAKE OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS VALID. THESE ELECTIONS BY "WE THE PEOPLE" MAKE OUR COURTS VALID, OUR JUDGES VALID, OUR PROSECUTORS VALID AND OUR PUBLIC DEFENDERS VALID.

FACT: In a republican form of government such as ours, every conviction of a single INDIVIDUAL involves the efforts of ALL THREE ELECTED BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT (the ELECTED LAW MAKERS who write the statutes, the ELECTED LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS whose appointees make the arrests and who file the charges, the ELECTED JUDGES who preside over proceedings in court AND the ELECTED PROSECUTORS who attempt to convict the statutory violators in court). In a republican form of government such as ours, NO SINGLE ELECTED BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT CAN CONVICT AN INDIVIDUAL WITHOUT THE PARTICIPATION OF THE OTHER TWO ELECTED BRANCHES OF GOVERNMENT.

FACT: The people who oppose, defy and seek the overthrow our ELECTED government, our ELECTED legislatures, our ELECTED executive (law enforcement) officials, our ELECTED judges, our ELECTED prosecutors and our ELECTED public defenders ACTUALLY OPPOSE, DEFY AND SEEK THE OVERTHROW OF OUR REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT ITSELF and in so doing, SEEK TO OVERTHROW THE WILL OF THE MAJORITY OF "WE THE PEOPLE" OURSELVES. This desire to overthrow our ELECTED republican form of government and the will of the majority of "We the People"COLLECTIVELY, along with his long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and his MULTIPLE weapons-related FELONIES are the reasons that Rod Class, has been placed on the United States "TERRORIST WATCH LIST".

LINKS:

+by+their+votes+the+people+exercise+their+sovereignty"+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006]http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2459141824775540924&q=%22Thomas+jefferson+stated+over+150+years+ago+that+%5Bit+is%5D+by+their+votes+the+people+exercise+their+sovereignty%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 (SEE HIGHLIGHTED TEXT.).

http://www.dictionary.com/browse/consent-of-the-governed


ABOUT ROD CLASS:
Rod Class is a functionally-illiterate amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education WHO HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (OVER 73 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES IN A ROW, AND STILL COUNTING). Further, Class has a long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS involving DELUSIONS, PATHOLOGICAL OPPOSITION/DEFIANCE of AUTHORITY FIGURES and PATHOLOGICAL LYING. Moreover, Class is a MULTI-CONVICTED, WEAPONS RELATED, CONVICTED FELON who also has SEVERAL ADDITIONAL MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS, as well. Because of Class’ well-publicized HATRED of our ELECTED representatives, their appointees and our REPUBLICAN form of government, because of his HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and because of his LENGTHY CRIMINAL HISTORY involving DEADLY WEAPONS, Class has been placed on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST. Most importantly, Class is a PROFESSIONAL HOAXER AND CHARLATAN who is behind a number of legal HOAXES which he created and peddles to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people.

ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not expose this hoax to harm Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this hoax solely to reduce the catastrophic damage that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Rod Class' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have exposed this hoax here.

The message? Just tell the truth.


(CONTINUED IN "ROD CLASS & THE 'SOVEREIGN CITIZEN' MYTH EXPLAINED")

PurpleSkyz

avatar
Admin

ROD CLASS & THE "SOVEREIGN CITIZEN HOAX EXPLAINED" Today at 2:44 pm

snoop4truth


Posts : 25
Join date : 2015-03-21
(CONTINUED FROM "ROD CLASS & SEVENTH GRADE CIVICS EXPLAINED". PLEASE READ THAT COMMENT FIRST.).

BACKGROUND: Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists mistakenly believe that a "SOVEREIGN" is an INDIVIDUAL and that the enemy of a "SOVEREIGN" is the GOVERNMENT of the state and all of the individuals in the state. But, this is not so. The government of the state and all of the individuals in the state IS THE "SOVEREIGN". The INDIVIDUAL IS NOT. But, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists do not know this. They get it EXACTLY BACKWARDS (OPPOSITE) to what the truth actually is (a common problem in amateur legal theory).

Thus, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists who oppose their own government ACTUALLY OPPOSE THE VERY "SOVEREIGN" AND THE VERY "SOVEREIGNTY" THAT THEY CLAIM TO SUPPORT. This means that Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists who oppose their own government ARE ACTUALLY THE ENEMIES of the "SOVEREIGN" and ACTUALLY THE ENEMIES of "SOVEREIGNTY", not their supporters. But, they do not know enough to realize this. This is why many such amateur legal theorists (like Rod Class) find themselves on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST (because they actually oppose the "SOVEREIGN" and because they actually oppose "SOVEREIGNTY").

This fundamental mistake (the belief that the INDIVIDUAL is "SOVEREIGN") reflects that the terms, "SOVEREIGN" and "SOVEREIGNTY" are perhaps the single most misused and misunderstood terms in all of amateur legal theory.

BACKGROUND: Originally in politics, a "SOVEREIGN" was a SINGLE "MONARCH" (King or Queen) GOVERNMENTAL HEAD OF STATE who GOVERNED a nation state and all of the INDIVIDUALS in the nation state. Originally, the RIGHT of a SINGLE "MONARCH" GOVERNMENTAL HEAD OF STATE to GOVERN its own nation state and all of the INDIVIDUALS in its own nation state WITHOUT OUTSIDE INTERFERENCE was that MONARCH's right of "SOVEREIGNTY".

Then and now, a "SOVEREIGN" meant/means a "GOVERNMENT" OF ITS OWN NATION STATE and all of the individuals in its own nation state. Then and now, "SOVEREIGNTY," meant/means that GOVERNMENT’S RIGHT TO GOVERN ITS OWN NATION STATE and all of the individuals in its own nation state WITHOUT OUTSIDE INTERFERENCE.

THE STATES: But, here in the United States, we rejected the notion of a SINGLE "MONARCH" GOVERNMENTAL HEAD OF STATE to GOVERN the state and all of the INDIVIDUALS in the state. Here in our country, we adopted a republican form of government whereby "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) GOVERNED our own states and all of the INDIVIDUALS in our own state COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) through our ELECTED representatives of our own STATE.

So, here in our country, THE STATE ITSELF, which consists of "We the People" COLLECTIVELY (not INDIVIDUALLY) became "SOVEREIGN" (which still means THE GOVERNMENT OF A STATE). This means that in our country THE STATE ITSELF legally stands in the shoes of the SINGLE MONARCH of yesteryear. So, in our country, THE STATE ITSELF GOVERNS the STATE and all of the INDIVIDUALS in the state (instead of the SINGLE MONARCH of yesteryear). But, the right, power and authority of THE STATE ITSELF as a "SOVEREIGN" and the right, power and authority of the MONARCH of yesteryear as a "SOVEREIGN" ARE EXACTLY THE SAME. In our country, a "SOVEREIGN" IS STILL A "GOVERNMENT" OF A STATE, but a "SOVEREIGN" is no longer a SINGLE MONARCH.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Thus, In our country, the term, "SOVEREIGN" is a term THAT ONLY APPLIES TO A GOVERNMENT OF "WE THE PEOPLE" COLLECTIVELY (AS A WHOLE) AND NOT TO A SINGLE "CITIZEN", INDIVIDUAL OR PERSON INDIVIDUALLY. But, Rod Class and other amateur legal theorists do not know enough to realize this. They get it EXACTLY BACKWARDS (OPPOSITE) to what the truth actually is.

Here in the United States, the INDIVIDUAL did not become a "GOVERNMENT" OF A STATE. So, here in the United States, the INDIVIDUAL did not become a "SOVEREIGN" (a GOVERNMENT OF A STATE). As a result, here in the United States, the INDIVIDUAL does not GOVERN the STATE or any of the INDIVIDUALS in the state.

THE UNITED STATES: The United States ITSELF is also a SOVEREIGN nation state consisting of a union of MEMBER SOVEREIGN STATES. So, here in the United States, THE STATES and the United States are both "SOVEREIGN" GOVERNMENTAL HEADS OF STATE (WITHIN THEIR RESPECTIVE JURISDICTIONS AS DIFFERENTIATED BY SUBJECT MATTER IN THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION).

This means that here in the United States, THE STATE AND THE UNITED STATES OCCUPY THE SAME EXACT LEGAL POSITION (AND HAVE THE SAME LEGAL RIGHT, POWER AND AUTHORITY TO GOVERN THE STATE AND ALL OF THE INDIVIDUALS IN THE STATE) AS DID THE SINGLE MONARCH OF YESTERYEAR, except that the powers of the United States (as distinguished from the individual STATES) are limited to those powers expressly delegated to it in the United States Constitution (a tiny list of subjects), whereas the powers of the individual STATES (as distinguished from the United States) have no such limitation.

Here in the United States, "We the People" exercise our "SOVEREIGNTY" COLLECTIVELY (NOT INDIVIDUALLY) through our VOTES. ---Thomas Jefferson (see below). Thus, "We the People" exercise our "SOVEREIGNTY" through our ELECTIONS.

But, as INDIVIDUALS, none of us are “SOVEREIGN”(which still means the GOVERNMENT of a state) and as INDIVIDUALS, none of us can exercise any "SOVEREIGNTY" (which still means  the right to GOVERN the state and all of the INDIVIDUALS in the state). In our country, we no longer recognize a SINGLE INDIVIDUAL (or “MONARCH”) as “SOVEREIGN”. In our country, no single INDIVIDUAL is the GOVERNMENT OF A STATE. This is why, in our country, no INDIVIDUAL can be "SOVEREIGN" (WHICH STILL MEANS A GOVERNMENT OF A STATE).

APPLICATION: This is why every amateur legal theorist who claims to be "SOVEREIGN" (a GOVERNMENT OF A STATE) always LOSES on that issue with law enforcement officers and in court. This is why all law enforcement officers and all courts always treat such amateur legal theorists as the mere INDIVIDUALS that they really are. Amateur legal theorists who claim to be "SOVEREIGN" (a government of a state) to law enforcement officers and in court do nothing but demonstrate their IGNORANCE of the law and their IGNORANCE of history--- AND THEY ALWAYS LOSE!

WHAT YOU CAN DO: If you do not like the laws, the ELECTED legislators, the ELECTED executive officers or the ELECTED judges or the ELECTED prosecutors, then do something about it. VOTE OR RUN FOR OFFICE. Pretending to be an INDIVIDUAL, GOVERNMENT OF A STATE (a “SOVEREIGN” MONARCH) has never, and will never work for you as a “defense” to the application of any law, the jurisdiction of any law enforcement officer or court or to the consequences any arrest, charge or conviction.

CONCLUSION: IN OUR COUNTRY, NO INDIVIDUAL CAN BE A "SOVEREIGN CITIZEN" (OR OTHERWISE "SOVEREIGN"). HERE, AND ELSEWHERE, ONLY A GOVERNMENT CAN BE A "SOVEREIGN". So, in our country, an INDIVIDUAL cannot "get his SOVEREIGNTY back".  This is because, In our country, NO INDIVIDUAL WAS EVER "SOVEREIGN" IN THE FIRST PLACE.

DEFINITION:

http://www.duhaime.org/LegalDictionary/S/Sovereign.aspx

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/sovereign

THE LAW:

+by+their+votes+the+people+exercise+their+sovereignty"+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006]+by+their+votes+the+people+exercise+their+sovereignty"+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006]http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2459141824775540924&q=%22Thomas+jefferson+stated+over+150+years+ago+that+%5Bit+is%5D+by+their+votes+the+people+exercise+their+sovereignty%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2011726581563609832&q=++%22is+not%22+%22beyond+the+jurisdiction%22+%22of+the+courts%22+%22regardless+of+an+individual%27s+claimed+status%22+%22no+conceivable+validity%22+%22argument+that+a+defendant+is+a%22+%22rejecting+the%22+individual+repeatedly+rejected+sovereignty+sovereign+citizen&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=16993091562091245184&q=%22The+...%22+theory+%22are+not+established+law%22++%22The+...theories+of+...%22++rejecting+argument+%22to+be+to+wholly+insubstantial+and%22+frivolous+%22finding+the%22+sovereign+citizens+citizen+%22This+is+a%22+%22legal+theory+that+is+consistently+rejected%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=16820160598854753158&q=%22in+this+country%27s%22+%22legal+system%22++%22theories+of+%27sovereign+citizens%27+are+not+established+law%22+%22Plaintiff%27s+purported+status+as+a+sovereign+citizen+does+not+enable+him+to+violate+state+and+federal+laws+without+consequence%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=15013050720983506132&q=refuse+refusal+refusing+bizarre+misguided+citizens++%22have+never+proven+effective%22+anti-government+movement+misplaced+%22out+of+context%22+incoherent+obsolete+antigovernment+movements+extremists+irrational+antics+sovereign+citizen+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006


ABOUT ROD CLASS:
Rod Class is a functionally-illiterate amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education WHO HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (OVER 73 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES IN A ROW, AND STILL COUNTING). Further, Class has a long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS involving DELUSIONS, PATHOLOGICAL OPPOSITION/DEFIANCE of AUTHORITY FIGURES and PATHOLOGICAL LYING. Moreover, Class is a MULTI-CONVICTED, WEAPONS RELATED, CONVICTED FELON who also has SEVERAL ADDITIONAL MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS, as well. Because of Class’ well-publicized HATRED of our ELECTED representatives, their appointees and our REPUBLICAN form of government, because of his HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and because of his LENGTHY CRIMINAL HISTORY involving DEADLY WEAPONS, Class has been placed on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST. Most importantly, Class is a PROFESSIONAL HOAXER AND CHARLATAN who is behind a number of legal HOAXES which he created and peddles to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people.

ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not expose this hoax to harm Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this hoax solely to reduce the catastrophic damage that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Rod Class' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have exposed this hoax here.

The message? Just tell the truth.



  

PurpleSkyz

avatar
Admin

WHY WAS ROD CLASS IN WASHINGTON, D.C. IN THE FIRST PLACE? Today at 2:33 pm

snoop4truth


Posts : 24
Join date : 2015-03-21
ANSWER: He was manufacturing a hoax in an effort to "TRICK" his own followers and the courts into believing that "Congress" had authorized him to practice law without a license. (Class mistakenly believed that Congress had such a power. But, it does not. Class did not know that under Article I, section 8 (which lists all of the powers of Congress) and under the tenth amendment (which reserves TO THE STATES all powers not delegated to the federal government in the U.S. Constitution), ONLY THE STATES HAVE THE POWER TO DO THAT.). (1)

Regardless, based on his mistaken belief, Class FORGED a two-page document (in all Italic font) consisting of a "FAKE" CONGRESSIONAL LETTERHEAD and a FAKE SIGNATURE PAGE (with a FAKE signature line for BOTH the HOUSE and the SENATE "judiciary committees"). (2) Class FRAUDULENTLY calls his FORGERY his "PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL CERTIFICATE" or his "CREDENTIALS". In his FORGERY, Class DESIGNATED HIMSELF a "Private Attorney General" under two CIVIL RIGHTS statutes (not realizing that such was actually a CIVIL RIGHTS CLIENT who could NOT practice law or represent another person in court). (3) In his FORGERY, Class also DESIGNATED HIMSELF a "14th Amendment, Section 4 Bounty Hunter" (not realizing that such was actually a Union CIVIL WAR SOLDIER 150 years ago). (4) Finally, in his FORGERY, Class also AUTHORIZED HIMSELF to practice law without a license (not realizing that Congress has no power to provide such an authorization). (No link to this FORGERY is yet available. It was found in Class' cases on Pacer.gov.). Class actually admits to all of this. (5)

BACKGROUND I: When ANYONE hand files ANY document with Congress, Congressional aides sign and date-stamp the word, "RECEIVED" on the top page of that document. Then, they provide the deliverer of the document with a duplicate of that same signed and date-stamped document for their own records (like a "receipt"). Class then uses the signed and date-stamped duplicate of HIS OWN FORGERY to create the illusion that Congress (rather than Class) wrote and issued the FORGERY. (After all, by then Class' FORGERY appears to be on Congressional letterhead, bears Congressional date stamps and has signatures "from Congress"). But, in truth, no single Congressman (much less ALL OF CONGRESS) ever takes any action on the FORGERIES that Class' UNILATERALLY hand files with Congressional aides in this way. Indeed, Congress has no power to take any such action in the first place. But, Class does not know this.

MISTAKES ON TOP OF MISTAKES:  All of this means that Class was so INCOMPETENT that in creating his FORGERY, he actually solicited signatures and date-stamps FROM THE WRONG GOVERNMENTAL BRANCH (legislative instead of judicial) OF THE WRONG GOVERNMENTAL SOVEREIGN (federal instead of state). You cannot get more INCOMPETENT than that. (In order to manufacture a really good hoax, YOU HAVE TO KNOW WHAT YOU ARE LYING ABOUT, and Class does not.).

BACKGROUND II: Class FRAUDULENTLY-MARKED his vehicle with several large FAKE vinyl decals to make it LOOK like a law enforcement vehicle. (6)

FACTS: On May 30th, 2013, Class (in his imaginary capacity as a "Private Attorney General") was en route from North Carolina to Pennsylvania to "help" an unwary victim LOSE his weapons case there. But, Class stopped in D.C. along the way to obtain some Congressional aide signatures and date-stamps on his FORGERY.  In so doing, Class illegally parked his conspicuously-marked vehicle on United States Capitol grounds in a parking lot located closest to occupied Congressional office buildings during business hours. This parking lot was clearly marked in such a way as to indicate that Class was not to park there. 

After illegally parking, Class went inside the adjacent Congressional office buildings for the reasons stated. When Class returned to the parking lot (delighted to have obtained what he had come for), he discovered that his conspicuously-marked vehicle was surrounded by a team of uniformed federal law enforcement officers who were busy peering through its windows counting all of the illegal "dangerous weapons" that were visible inside (and located next to occupied Congressional office buildings during business hours). (Think "Timothy McVeigh", the Murrah Federal Building and the Oklahoma City Bombing in a post-911 world.).

Inside Class' vehicle, federal officers found: one fully-loaded rifle, three fully-loaded handguns, one of which was completely and illegally unsecured and positioned between the front seats for quick and easy access, several hundred more rounds of ammunition for all four firearms on-board, one large machete on the driver’’s side door for easy access, fourteen large knives & daggers of varying size and lethal effect, one illegal spring-deployed switch blade knife and three more axes of various sizes and lethal effect.

When Class returned to his vehicle, officers asked him if the vehicle was his, he replied, "Yes". When officers asked Class it he had driven his vehicle onto United State Capitol grounds and parked it where it sat, Class replied, "Yes". When officers asked Class if the "dangerous weapons" inside the vehicle were his, he replied, "Yes". On the basis of these voluntary confessions (all of which  Class openly admits to), Class was charged and convicted of "carrying" "dangerous weapons" "onto United States Capitol grounds". (7) It's that simple. There was nothing bizarre, unusual, curious, fraudulent, corrupt, illegal or unconstitutional about what the officers or the courts did in this case.

Unknown to Class, his conduct here also violated the terms of his conceal and carry permit from North Carolina. So, unknown to Class, his permit offered him no "defense" to the charges against him here. (8)

Unknown to Class, even if he had a second amendment defense to "carrying" firearms or handguns onto United States Capitol grounds in a post 9-11 world, he had no second amendment defense to "carrying" the other "dangerous weapons" (including machetes, knives & daggers, switch blades and axes) onto United States Capitol grounds.

NOTE: Class is PATHOLOGICALLY DESPERATE to appear to be something that he is not ("Private Attorney General",  "14th Amendment, Section 4 Bounty Hunter", "winning litigator", "legal genius", etc.).

FACT: If Class had not stopped in D.C. to obtain Congressional aide signatures and date-stamps on his FORGERY (in order to appear to be something that he is not), Class WOULD NOT have been arrested and convicted of "carrying dangerous weapons onto U.S. Capitol grounds".

FACT: If Class had not ALSO fraudulently-marked his vehicle with FAKE vinyl decals (in order to appear to be something that he is not), Class' vehicle would have likely escaped the attention of federal law enforcement officers and Class WOULD NOT likely have been arrested or convicted.

FOOTNOTES:
1). See Const., Art. 1, Sec. 8 (WHICH LISTS ALL OF THE POWERS OF CONGRESS).
http://www.annenbergclassroom.org/page/article-i-section-8 (Note that the power to authorize a person to practice law IS NOT ON THE LIST). Unknown to Class, ONLY THE STATES HAVE THE POWER TO DO THAT.  http://www.annenbergclassroom.org/page/tenth-amendment. Class makes this very same AMATEUR mistake with respect to driver's licenses which are likewise governed by STATE law (not by FEDERAL law).

2. 
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2757756755752158953&q=denied+%22there+is+no+evidence+supporting%22+%22this+allegation%22+%22private+attorney+general%22+%22Rodney+Class%22+%22defendant+claims+he+has+been+given+authority+by+the+house+and+senate+to+act+as+a%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 . (See Ruling 35).

3.
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=16098434127441351570&q=counsel+%22+successful+plaintiffs%22+attorney+attorneys+discrimination+fee+fees+negroes+racial+%22civil+rights%22+%22he+does+so%22+%22when+a+plaintiff%22+%22obtains+an+injunction%22+%22as+a+private+attorney+general%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 .

What a REAL PAG looks like.
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22civil+rights%22+victims&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjp2MH9kubSAhWB1CYKHWXqDjAQ_AUIBygC&biw=1366&bih=613#spf=1.

4.
https://www.britannica.com/event/Bounty-System

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bounty_jumper 

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2388571488588603535&q=+%22by+any+future+congress+controlled+by+southerners+and+their+sympathizers%22+%22in+fighting+the+civil+war%22+%22the+fourteenth+amendment+was+intended+to+prevent+the+questioning+of+the+war+debt+incurred+by+the+union%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 .

5).
https://itnj.org/wp-content/uploads/ITNJ/ITNJ_Cases/rod_class/case_outline/Rod_Class_DC_Case_Outline_First_Two_Month.pdf (AT PAGE 2 PARA. 2.). Here, Class actually admits to seeking and obtaining Congressional signatures & date-stamps on his FORGERY in furtherance of this hoax.

6.
http://www.nc4x4.com/forum/threads/douche-bag-attractant.159266/

Class was previously convicted for illegally installing a real police blue light on top of his vehicle (to make it LOOK like a law enforcement vehicle). Class was sentenced to A YEAR'S PROBATION conditioned on him "not possessing weapons" of any kind. Class was actually ON PROBATION for that conviction when he was arrested in D.C. with "weapons" here, thereby constituting a VIOLATION OF HIS PROBATION.

7.
+a+dangerous+weapon"+"may+not+carry"+"carry[ing]"+&hl=en&as_sdt=40003]+a+dangerous+weapon"+"may+not+carry"+"carry[ing]"+&hl=en&as_sdt=40003]http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2757756755752158953&q=%22which+will+or%22+%22defining+a+firearm%22+%22capitol+buildings%22+%22on+the+grounds%22+%22expel+a+projectile+by+the+action+of+an+explosive%22+%22is+designed+to%22++%22any+weapon%22+%22%5Bor%5D+a+dangerous+weapon%22+%22may+not+carry%22+%22carry%5Bing%5D%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40003 (SEE BOTH SECTIONS).

8. N.C.G.S. 14-415.11(C)(4).
http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/HTML/BySection/Chapter_14/GS_14-415.11.html.


ROD CLASS SEMINARS & CLASSES & "THREE TIMES YOUR MONEY BACK!"
If you have PAID to attend ANY SEMINAR (or "webinar" or "class") involving Rod Class' IN RELIANCE of his claims that: 1). He is a "Private Attorney General"; 2). He can "TRAIN" you to be a "Private Attorney General"; 3) He KNOWS THE LAW; or that 4). He has "won" ANY case in ANY court, THEN YOU MAY RECOVER THREE (3) TIMES YOUR MONEY BACK, PLUS ATTORNEY FEES, PLUS OTHER LEGAL COSTS UNDER FEDERAL RICO!

THE LAW ON ROD CLASS SEMINARS & CLASSES UNDER FEDERAL RICO:

1). http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17967775573114200296&q=costs+%22attorneys%27+fees%22+trebeled+punitive+damages+%22legal+system%22+%22tax+laws%22+%22we+affirm%22+fraud+misrepresentation+%22they+could+lawfully+reduce+their+income+tax+liability+to+zero%22++promised+RICO+seminars+seminar+treble&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

2). http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1188670168177314413&q=denied+cost+%22attorney%27s+fee%22+threefold+%22ranged+from+%24495-1695%22+%22the+fee+for+the+four-day+real+estate%22+damages+%22attorneys%27+fees%22+costs+RICO+seminars+seminar+treble&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

3). http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13603216179463577076&q=denied+%22turn+anyone+into%22+%22will+show+you%22+%22can+teach+you%22+success+offering+%22real+estate%22+%22master+strategies%22+denies+cost+%22attorney%27s+fee%22+threefold+damages+%22purporting+to+teach+Defendant%27s%22+RICO+seminars+seminar+treble&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

4). http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14610347749862677361&q=trebled+costs+threefold+%22attorney%27s+fees%22+damages+%22as+capable%22+%22they+had+improved+their+credit+scores%22+%22represented+that%22++%22false+and+known+to+be+so%22+%22attorneys+fees%22+%22credit+repair%22+%22repairing+broken+credit%22+RICO+seminars+seminar+threefold&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

EXAMPLE (BELOW) OF SUCH A ROD CLASS RICO "SEMINAR" OR "CLASS":

(Begin Quote)

>> Potential PAG Seminar at the end of August ! <<

This is a P.A.G. Inquiry only at this time ! In the last six months,
we have had new interest asking when the next P.A.G. Seminar
might be. We have a Camp Ground available with an air-conditioned
auditorium that will seat 30 people. This next P.A.G. Seminar can
be confirmed by 30 people confirming with a deposit donation
of a non-refundable pledge of $300 cash to help with setting up costs.
The rest of the fee donation to attend the next P.A.G. Seminar of $700
cash would be due at the door. The total P.A.G. Seminar cost will be
$1000 which includes FIVE 8 hour days of training with the following
weekend Saturday/Sunday reserved for one-on-one consultations
with Rod Class and Carl Weston. As some might know we have
worked on many types of cases...assisting with Administrative and
Judicial cases through the years and have many WINS including
money Judgments. If you feel you might be able to attend the next
P.A.G. Seminar and help out with a $300 Deposit for costs to set up
please forward your interest response to: PrivateGeneral@hughes.net

PLEASE put "August PAG Seminar" in the subject line !

The P.A.G. Seminar date will be set for late August. 

Note: Motel and food costs will be your responsibility.

(End Quote)

ABOUT ROD CLASS:
Rod Class is a functionally-illiterate amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education WHO HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (OVER 73 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES IN A ROW, AND STILL COUNTING). Further, Class has a long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS involving DELUSIONS, PATHOLOGICAL OPPOSITION/DEFIANCE of AUTHORITY FIGURES and PATHOLOGICAL LYING. Moreover, Class is a MULTI-CONVICTED, WEAPONS RELATED, CONVICTED FELON who also has SEVERAL ADDITIONAL MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS, as well. Because of Class’ well-publicized HATRED of our ELECTED representatives, their appointees and our REPUBLICAN form of government, because of his HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and because of his LENGTHY CRIMINAL HISTORY involving DEADLY WEAPONS, Class has been placed on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST. Most importantly, Class is a PROFESSIONAL HOAXER AND CHARLATAN who is behind a number of legal HOAXES which he created and peddles to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people.

ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not expose this hoax to harm Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this hoax solely to reduce the catastrophic damage that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Rod Class' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have exposed this hoax here.

The message? Just tell the truth.



  

PurpleSkyz

avatar
Admin

ROD CLASS & THE "FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES ARE NOT MONEY HOAX" (A.K.A. THE "HAROLD STANLEY HOAX") Today at 2:24 pm

snoop4truth


Posts : 23
Join date : 2015-03-21
FIRST, SEE THE HOAX HERE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCisCCMQqng&t=610s

THE HOAX: In BRAGGING about LOSING Harold Stanley's case. Class BRAGS that he testified in court that "FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES ARE NOT MONEY". Class falsely claims that he LOST Harold Stanley's case because the judge excluded (or later "struck") that "EVIDENCE". Further, Class falsely claims that when the judge excluded (or "struck") that "EVIDENCE", that ruling constituted the “crime” of suppressing or withholding  exculpatory “EVIDENCE”. So, Class  purported to sue the judge, the prosecutors and others on behalf of Stanley for this imaginary "crime". 

THE TRUTH: 
Class did not know then and does not know now that SUCH TAX PROTESTER ARGUMENTS: 1). ARE NOT "EVIDENCE" in the first place (they are "ARGUMENT"); 2). WERE NOT LEGALLY “RELEVANT” (to the actual claims or defenses of the parties); and 3). WERE LEGALLY ERRONEOUS (opposite to what the law actually is/was).  FINALLY, CLASS DID NOT KNOW THEN AND DOES NOW KNOW NOW THAT THIS TAX PROTESTER ARGUMENT HAS BEEN PUTTING TAX PROTESTERS IN PRISON FOR MORE THAN 40 YEARS.

CLASS' MISTAKES WHICH SENT HAROLD STANLEY TO FEDERAL PRISON FOR 5 to 8 YEARS!

1. MISTAKE 1- Class had no idea what Harold Stanley’s case was actually about. Class mistakenly believed that Stanley’s case was about the IRS claiming that Stanley owed income taxes to the IRS. (But, it was not.). So, Class mistakenly set out to prove that Stanley did not owe income taxes to the IRS (something that, unknown to Class, was completely IRRELEVANT to Stanley’s case).

In order to prove that Stanley did not owe income taxes to the IRS (something that, unknown to Class, was completely IRRELEVANT to Stanley’s case), Class claimed that he testified (or sought to testify) that "Federal Reserve Notes ("FRNs") are not money".

NOTE: The “reasoning” behind this particular tax protester argument is that if "FRNs are not money", then a tax protester (like Stanley) who is paid in the form of “FRNs” can argue that he did not receive any “MONEY” and therefore incurred no "INCOME" tax liability to the IRS. Further, if  “FRNs are not money”, then it would be “impossible” for a tax protester (like Stanley) to “PAY” any "INCOME" taxes to the IRS since all he/she has to “PAY” "INCOME" taxes with are FRNs which “are not money” making true “PAYMENT” of income taxes “impossible”, etc.

To make matters worse, Class could not understand why Harold Stanley's case was filed in the Federal Court For The Western District of Missouri, instead of being filed in a "Tax Court" (where Class usually LOSES his IRS cases). Class even erroneously claimed that the district court "did not have jurisdiction" over Stanley’s case because the case was filed in the “wrong court”. But, this was not so.

Unknown to Class, the reason that this case was filed in in federal district court was that the United States DID NOT merely charge Stanley with not paying income taxes (in which event, the case would have been filed in "Tax Court", where Class usually LOSES his IRS cases)). Instead, in this case, the United States charged Stanley with federal CRIMES  which can only be filed in federal district court (not in "Tax Court" where Class usually LOSES his IRS cases). Specifically, in this case, the United States charged Stanley with: SUBMITTING FAKE MONEY ORDERS TO THE IRS; SUBMITTING FALSE DOCUMENTS TO THE IRS FALSELY INDICATING THAT HIS TAX DEBTS WERE "SATISFIED" BECAUSE THEY HAD BEEN "ACCEPTED FOR VALUE"; SUBMITTING FAKE PAYMENT VOUCHERS TO THE IRS WITHOUT SUBMITTING THE PAYMENT "VOUCHED" FOR and SUBMITTING A FALSE COMPLAINT TO A LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY FALSELY ACCUSING THE IRS OF A CRIME (something that Class likely had a hand in himself). 

This means that even if Class had been allowed to testify that “FRNs are not money” (and even if that testimony had been legally correct, and it was not), STANLEY WOULD HAVE STILL BEEN CONVICTING OF SUBMITTING FAKE MONEY ORDERS TO THE IRS, SUBMITTING FALSE DOCUMENTS TO THE IRS FALSELY INDICATING THAT HIS TAX DEBTS WERE PAID, SUBMITTING FAKE PAYMENT VOUCHERS TO THE IRS WITHOUT SUBMITTING THE PAYMENT “VOUCHED” FOR AND FILING A FALSE COMPLAINT WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES, ETC. This is because whether or not FRNs are "money" has no bearing whatsoever ON WHETHER HAROLD STANLEY SUBMITTED FAKE MONEY ORDERS TO THE IRS, WHETHER HE SUBMITTED FALSE DOCUMENTS TO THE IRS FALSELY INDICATING THAT TAX DEBTS WERE PAID, WHETHER HE SUBMITTED FAKE PAYMENT “VOUCHERS” TO THE IRS WITHOUT SUBMITTING THE PAYMENT “VOUCHED” FOR OR WHETHER HE FILED A FALSE COMPLAINT WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES.

So, Class’ proffered testimony about FRNs was NOT LEGALLY”RELEVANT” to the ACTUAL claims and defenses of the parties and was therefore legally “INADMISSIBLE” under the Federal Rules of Evidence and the judge PROPERLY EXCLUDED IT. But, Class does not know ANY of this.

2. MISTAKE 2- Unknown to Class, TAX PROTESTER ARGUMENTS ARE NOT “EVIDENCE” IN THE FIRST PLACE (they are "ARGUMENT").

"FACTS" are "EVENTS" that can be "WITNESSED". But, AMATEUR LEGAL THEORIES, TAX PROTESTER ARGUMENTS and the "LAW" ARE NOT "EVENTS" that can be "WITNESSED".

"FACT WITNESSES" (of the type that Class was in this case) can ONLY testify as to RELEVANT “EVENTS” that they actually "WITNESSED" (ex: "I saw him crawl out the window."). But, “FACT WITNESSES”, of the type that Class was in this case, cannot testify as to “OPINIONS”, the “LAW” or “LEGAL ARGUMENTS OR CONCLUSIONS” about the “LAW” (because those things are not “EVENTS” that Class actually "WITNESSED").  

ALL APPLICABLE “LAW” IS ALWAYS PRESENTED TO THE JURY IN EVERY SINGLE JURY TRIAL, AS IT WAS IN THIS CASE. But, such “LAW” is not presented to the jury by mere “FACT WITNESSES” of the type that Rod Class was in this case. It is the JUDGE who presents all applicable “LAW” to the jury in all jury trials (meaning “LAW” that actually relates to the claims and/or defenses of the parties). And, Class was not a judge.

Further, it is the attorneys at law or the pro se parties themselves who make all legal ARGUMENTS (like tax protester ARGUMENTS) to the jury, not mere “FACT WITNESSES” of the type that Rod Class was in this case. Because legal theories, legal arguments and legal conclusions are NOT "EVENTS" that Class actually "WITNESSED", the judge properly "excluded" or "struck" Class' proffered testimony about FRNs. But, Class does not know ANY of this. 

3. MISTAKE 3- Unknown to Class, under the law itself, FRNs ARE MONEY! (See links below.). This means that Class was so ignorant of the law that he did not even know then, and does not know now that his "excluded" or "stricken" ERRONEOUS "testimony" about FRNs WAS EXACTLY BACKWARDS (OPPOSITE) TO WHAT THE LAW ACTUALLY WAS!

THE LAW: "FRNs ARE NOT MONEY" IN THE TAX PROTESTER CONTEXT:

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4823644493408609770&q=%22federal+reserve+notes%22+%22are+not+money%22+rejected+frivolous+groundless+%22repeatedly+considered+and%22+universally+%22other+protester-type+arguments%22+ambassador+%22who+accepts+no+governmental+privileges%22+exempt+%22was+improperly+ratified%22+%22sixteenth+amendment%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3006283153837357387&q=%22we+will+not+waste+our+time+discussing+such+hollow+arguments%22+%22not+reportable+as+income%22+%22which+have+been+considered+and+rejected+on+numerous+occasions%22+%22constitute+income%22+%22federal+reserve+notes%22+%22not+money%22+%22It+has+been+consistently+held+however+that%22&hl=en&scisbd=2&as_sdt=40006

https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10850436806728706662&q=%22They+must+be+rejected+again%22+%22all+of+these+tired+allegations+have+been+considered+by+the+courts+and+rejected+repeatedly%22+%22are+not+income%22+%22federal+reserve+notes%22+%22are+not+money%22&hl=en&scisbd=2&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4117162275911214916&q=valueless+%22Not+redeemable%22+%22constitutional+money%22+%22not+dollars%22+%22lawful+money%22+unredeemable+fraudulent+fraud+worthless+imposed+penalty+additional++sanctions+%22protester+allegations%22+misguided+groundless+frivolous+%22Federal+Reserve+Notes%22+%22are+not+money%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

THE LAW: "FRNs ARE NOT MONEY" OUTSIDE THE TAX PROTESTER CONTEXT. 

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14753248592698700360&q=%22has+established+that%22+%22Congress,+in+full+accordance+with+its+authority+under%22+%22the+constitution%22+%22do+not+constitute+money%22+%22are+legal+tender%22+%22is+clearly+without+merit%22+%22clearly+baseless%22+%22Federal+reserve+notes%22+%22are+not+money%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8617227736829971139&q=%22constitutional+form%22+%22are+not+money%22+%22legal+tender%22+%22prohibiting+states%22+%22preventing+states%22+rejected+%22has+been+rejected%22+%22finding+untenable%22+dismissing+%22is+meritless%22+%22does+not%22+%22Federal+reserve+notes%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=7559490608550942578&q=untenable+baseless+dismissed+insufficient+%22absolutely+no+merit%22+rejected++frivolous+hopeless+%22federal+reserve+notes%22+%22not+money%22+%22are+legal+tender%22+%22as+legal+tender%22&hl=en&scisbd=2&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13457230164550911078&q=%22the+award+of+attorney+fees+was+an+appropriate+deterrent+to+future+frivolous+suits%22+%22has+been+rejected+by+every+court+considering+the+claim%22+%22the+claim+that%22+%22federal+reserve+notes%22+%22are+not+valid+money%22&hl=en&scisbd=2&as_sdt=40006

ABOUT ROD CLASS:
Rod Class is a functionally-illiterate amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education WHO HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (OVER 73 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES IN A ROW, AND STILL COUNTING). Further, Class has a long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS involving DELUSIONS, PATHOLOGICAL OPPOSITION/DEFIANCE of AUTHORITY FIGURES and PATHOLOGICAL LYING. Moreover, Class is a MULTI-CONVICTED, WEAPONS RELATED, CONVICTED FELON who also has SEVERAL ADDITIONAL MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS, as well. Because of Class’ well-publicized HATRED of our ELECTED representatives, their appointees and our REPUBLICAN form of government, because of his HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and because of his LENGTHY CRIMINAL HISTORY involving DEADLY WEAPONS, Class has been placed on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST. Most importantly, Class is a PROFESSIONAL HOAXER AND CHARLATAN who is behind a number of legal HOAXES which he created and peddles to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people.

ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not expose this hoax to harm Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this hoax solely to reduce the catastrophic damage that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Rod Class' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have exposed this hoax here.

The message? Just tell the truth.



  

PurpleSkyz

avatar
Admin

ROD CLASS & THE "DEBRA JONES HOAX" & THE "JUDGE DALE HOAX" Today at 2:19 pm

snoop4truth


Posts : 22
Join date : 2015-03-21
FIRST, SEE LINKS HERE: https://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2014/07/10/rod-class-a-former-policewomanattorney-reveals-what-it-is-like-inside-thanks-to-j/ . http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=48361&pageNumber=7&pageSize=15 (Click on Episode 869 dated 07-08-2014.).

ROD CLASS:
Class is a functionally-illiterate amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education, a history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and a record of LOSING EVERY SINGLE ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (MORE THAN 73 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES IN A ROW AND STILL COUNTING). In addition, Class is a TWICE-CONVICTED, weapons-related, CONVICTED FELON (possessing in his car an illegally-sawed-off, fully-loaded, Springfield shotgun, two night sticks outfitted with concealed razor blades, one fully-loaded rifle, three fully-loaded handguns, one of which was illegally unsecured and positioned between the front seats for quick and easy access, several hundred more rounds of ammunition for all four firearms on-board, one large machete on the driver’s side door for easy access, fourteen large knives and daggers of varying size and lethal effect, one illegal spring-deployed switch blade knife, three axes of various sizes and packages of concealed razor-type blades found beneath his clothing when frisked, etc.).

But, more importantly, Class is a NOTORIOUS PROFESSIONAL HOAXER AND CHARLATAN who is behind the “Judge DALE Hoax”, the” BOMBSHELL: FOURTH Administrative Ruling Hoax”, the “Property Into Other People’s Names Hoax”, the “Court Registry Investment System Hoax” and numerous other legal hoaxes, all of which he uses to “TRICK” his own followers into believing his intentionally false claims about the law and the legal system.

Class has his own internet radio show on AIB Talkshoe Radio (which broadcasts a pre-recorded "CONFERENCE CALL").
http://removingtheshackles.blogspot.com/2013/11/judge-dale-global-currency-reset-and.html. On this show, Class makes intentionally FALSE and FRAUDULENT claims about the law and the legal system to incite hatred and violence against the ELECTED representatives of "We The People" and their appointees. On his show, Class advocates suing these people and their agencies for doing their jobs. For jurisdictional reasons, Class recommends suing them in administrative court using the "ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS".  http://removingtheshackles.blogspot.com/2013/01/judge-dale-on-ucc-filings-and-further.html .

DEBRA JONES HOAX:
On July 8, 2014, in Episode 869, Class purported to bring in a "LEGAL INSIDER" as a guest on his radio show and introduced her as "former attorney" and "former law enforcement officer", "Debra Jones’’. (See links at very top.). 

Not surprisingly, during this 2 hour 43 minute show, Jones made the same utterly delusional claims about the law and the legal system that Class himself makes. But, Jones also claimed that: 1). as a “former police woman”, she and her fellow officers did nothing but intentionally break the law to harm the public; and that 2). as a “former attorney”, she, the judges, the prosecutors and her fellow attorneys did nothing but intentionally break the law to harm the public. (See links at very top.).

Class’ radio audience was understandably SHOCKED and HORRIFIED by the claims of Jones whom they genuinely believed was a REAL "legal insider" who was actually telling them the TRUTH. This radio show became an internet sensation, much to the delight of Class and Jones (because it successfully incited the hatred and violence that is was intended to incite).

THE TRUTH:
There was only one problem. THE WHOLE THING WAS ONE BIG HOAX. Before putting her on his internet radio show, Class already knew that Jones WAS NOT a “legal insider”,  WAS NOT a "former attorney" and  WAS NOT a "former law enforcement officer".  In fact, Class already knew that Jones was EVERY BIT THE FRAUD AND CHARLATAN THAT HE WAS.

ABOUT JONES:
1. Jones’ REAL name is "Debra Jenks Jones";
2. Jones is 50 years old;
3. Jones lives in Puyallup, Pierce County, Washington State. This is why many of her seminars are conveniently held in nearby Yelp, Washington State;
4. Jones HAS NEVER HAD a professional license of ANY TYPE from ANY STATE (which means that she was NEVER an attorney). This is why Jones will not reveal the name of the law school that she allegedly attended or the state(s) that allegedly issued her a law license;
5. Jones was NEVER a "law enforcement officer". This is why Jones will not reveal the name and location of the law enforcement agency/ies at which she was allegedly so employed;
6. Jones STILL solicits and collects money from her victims for seminars by FRAUDULENTLY claiming to be a "former police officer" and a former "police woman".
http://protrustacademy.com/

NOTE:
It is a STATE crime to impersonate an "attorney" or a "law enforcement officer”. It is a FEDERAL FELONY to use a "means of interstate commerce" (like the internet) to commit fraud (like soliciting money for seminars by fraudulently claiming to be a "former attorney", "former police officer" or by fraudulently claiming to be "Private Attorney General" who can "train" others to become the same).
http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2015/06/rod-class-live-call-tonight-tues-jun-23.html. Victims who have paid for such seminars may recover THREE TIMES their money back under FEDERAL RICO.

JUDGE DALE HOAX:
Rodney "DALE" Class and two other NOTORIOUS PROFESSIONAL HOAXERS AND CHARLATANS distributed FAKE legal books online that revealed FAKE legal information WHICH THEY THEMSELVES ACTUALLY CREATED, but which they fraudulently told the American people were written by a FAKE “retired federal judge” named, “Judge DALE” (which uses Rodney DALE Class’ middle name, “DALE”, as an inside joke). The “Judge DALE forgeries” include: “The Matrix And the US Constitution” (2010), “The Great American Adventure: Secrets Of America” (2012) and “Lawfully Yours” (2014). Most of the other “Judge DALE” articles posted online are mere re-prints of section five of “The Great American Adventure” under different names (“Legal Advice From A Retired Federal Judge Turned Whistle Blower”, “Retired Federal Judge Spills The Beans”, etc.). In the “Judge DALE Forgeries”, Rodney "DALE" Class confirmed his own delusional claims about the law and the legal system while FRAUDULENTLY pretending to be "Judge DALE". Like all of Rod Class’ claims about the law and the legal system, his claims in the “Judge DALE forgeries” were also designed and intended to incite hatred and violence against the ELECTED representatives of "We the People" and their appointees. As hard as it is to believe, Class’ two co-conspirators in this hoax still peddle all three of the “Judge DALE forgeries” from their own personal websites DESPITE THAT EVERYONE KNOWS THEY ARE ENTIRELY FAKE.
http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/THE-GREAT-AMERICAN-ADVENTURE.pdfhttps://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/the-great-american-adventure-sm-book-format_pdf.pdf
https://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/the-matrix-and-the-us-constitution-sm-bk-format1.pdf
https://anticorruptionsociety.com/2014/05/05/the-matrix-and-the-us-constitution/
And, speaking of "MATRIX" hoaxes, for more "MATRIX" hoaxes by the very same charlatans involved here, go to:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ts7CejgSkjc&t=22s (Go to this video FIRST. Then, go to :30-:45 for an ACTUAL PHOTO of THE REAL "Judge DALE" inside the "MATRIX"); http://www.globaltruth.net/jeff-rense-deborah-tavares-escaping-the-matrix/; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sykRuXXNJzU ; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HX5IJMevyP8 ; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4eRlBbcFkc
(FORGERIES CONTINUED)
https://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/lawfully-yours-ninth-edition.pdf
https://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/bond-vs-united-states1.pdf
https://anticorruptionsociety.com/tag/judge-dale/

RELATED DOCUMENTS:
https://anticorruptionsociety.com/rod-class/
https://anticorruptionsociety.com/tag/rodney-dale-class/
https://anticorruptionsociety.com/2013/09/23/our-courts-have-nothing-to-do-with-justice/

OTHERS DIRECTLY INVOLVED IN THE "JUDGE DALE HOAX":
http://removingtheshackles.blogspot.com/2013/11/judge-dale-global-currency-reset-and.html
http://removingtheshackles.blogspot.com/2013/01/judge-dale-on-ucc-filings-and-further.html
http://www.shiftfrequency.com/admiralty-courts-law-of-the-see/#more-26988

CLASS' CO-CONSPIRATORS CAUGHT ON TAPE WHILE ACTUALLY ENGAGED IN THE THE "JUDGE DALE HOAX".  (Jeff Rense is NOT involved in the hoax.). Go to the following videos FIRST. Then, go to the times indicated below. They are the exact times of the hoax documented therein.  
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05o4CpB9I8g&t=260s (Go to this video FIRST, then go to 2:25-11:35)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k (Same as above. 42:10-49:15)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKI4zPI504E (Same. 3:50-4:30 & 7:15-56:00)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dgYbD6fcw8 (Same. 34:20-36:30)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAryrdGenL4 (Same. 1:30-1:45)

Class’ co-conspirators in the “Judge DALE Hoax” are the same two charlatans who assisted Class in ALL OF THE “LEGAL” HOAXES DESCRIBED ABOVE (in the second paragraph). These two charlatans are also behind the “NASA War Document Hoax” and the “Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars Hoax”. For more on these hoaxes, read the comments by snoop4truth posted below the following videos. 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4J7NLlloN0&t=274s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_Bk_YmrK-M&t=3701s


ABOUT ROD CLASS:
Rod Class is a functionally-illiterate amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education WHO HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (OVER 73 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES IN A ROW, AND STILL COUNTING). Further, Class has a long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS involving DELUSIONS, PATHOLOGICAL OPPOSITION/DEFIANCE of AUTHORITY FIGURES and PATHOLOGICAL LYING. Moreover, Class is a MULTI-CONVICTED, WEAPONS RELATED, CONVICTED FELON who also has SEVERAL ADDITIONAL MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS, as well. Because of Class’ well-publicized HATRED of our ELECTED representatives, their appointees and our REPUBLICAN form of government, because of his HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and because of his LENGTHY CRIMINAL HISTORY involving DEADLY WEAPONS, Class has been placed on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST. Most importantly, Class is a PROFESSIONAL HOAXER AND CHARLATAN who is behind a number of legal HOAXES which he created and peddles to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people.

ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not expose this hoax to harm Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this hoax solely to reduce the catastrophic damage that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Rod Class' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have exposed this hoax here.

The message? Just tell the truth.



  

PurpleSkyz

avatar
Admin

ROD CLASS & "THE SUPREME COURT LOVES MY 'PAPERWORK' HOAX" Today at 12:46 pm

snoop4truth


Posts : 21
Join date : 2015-03-21
ROD CLASS (WHO HAS LOST 73 CASES IN A ROW) NOW FRAUDULENTLY TAKES CREDIT FOR THE SUCCESS OF HIS ATTORNEYS IN GETTING THE SUPREME COURT TO CONSIDER A NEW LEGAL QUESTION THAT CLASS NEVER KNEW ABOUT AND NEVER RAISED ANYWHERE AT ANY TIME.


FIRST: SEE THE HOAX HERE:


https://claimsoftheliving.blogspot.com/2017/06/rod-class-update-headed-to-supreme-court.html .


http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=48361&cmd=tc (See Episode 1004, Dated 05-26-2017).

BACKGROUND:
Class was charged with "CARRYING" "DANGEROUS WEAPONS" in his vehicle onto "UNITED STATES CAPITOL GROUNDS", a FELONY. 
+a+dangerous+weapon"+"may+not+carry"+"carry[ing]"+&hl=en&as_sdt=40003]+a+dangerous+weapon"+"may+not+carry"+"carry[ing]"+&hl=en&as_sdt=40003]http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2757756755752158953&q=%22which+will+or%22+%22defining+a+firearm%22+%22capitol+buildings%22+%22on+the+grounds%22+%22expel+a+projectile+by+the+action+of+an+explosive%22+%22is+designed+to%22++%22any+weapon%22+%22%5Bor%5D+a+dangerous+weapon%22+%22may+not+carry%22+%22carry%5Bing%5D%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40003 (SEE BOTH SECTIONS OF HIGHLIGHTED TEXT).

Class entered into a plea deal whereby he would plead GUILTY to the FELONY charge against him in exchange for the prosecutor recommending a light sentence to the judge. As part of the plea deal, CLASS WAIVED ("GAVE UP") HIS RIGHT TO APPEAL, first in the plea agreement itself and again in open court.

Thereafter, Class realized that his GUILTY plea to a FELONY (in the plea deal) would make him ineligible for his conceal and carry permit from the State Of North Carolina (which does not allow CONVICTED FELONS to have such permits). So, Class VIOLATED the terms of his own plea agreement (in which he WAIVED his right to appeal) AND FILED AN APPEAL OF HIS CASE ANYWAY.

In his appeal, Class raised a number of amateur legal theories. Class also MISTAKENLY claimed that the statute that he was convicted of violating HAD ALREADY BEEN DECLARED UNCONSTITUTIONAL and he MISTAKENLY claimed that under the "full faith and credit" clause, he was authorized by his North Carolina conceal and carry permit him to "CARRY" handguns/firearms into Washington, D.C. AND onto United States Capitol grounds (which behavior, unknown to Class, ACTUALLY VIOLATED the terms his conceal and carry permit from that state). BUT MOST IMPORTANTLY, CLASS NEVER KNEW TO RAISE (AND DID NOT RAISE) THE ISSUE OF WHETHER HE COULD FILE AN APPEAL OF HIS CASE IN THE FIRST PLACE (a right that he had TWICE unconditionally WAIVED, first in his plea deal and again in open court).

The Court Of Appeals received Class' amateur appellate brief and the entire court file from the trial court below (which contained Class' PSYCHIATRIC records). Both PROVED that Class was ILLITERATE, UNEDUCATED and MENTALLY ILL. So, as the trial court had done below (with "STAND BY" counsel to represent Class), the Court Of Appeals ALSO hired, AT THE GOVERNMENT'S EXPENSE, a law firm to represent Class on appeal and ordered it, in writing, to "act on Class' behalf". Because Class wanted to represent himself on appeal, the Court of Appeals "humored" Class by calling the law firm that it hired to represent Class an "amicus curiae" ("friend of court"). But, the reality is that this law firm was under written court orders to represent Class as his law firm on appeal, regardless of the terminology used. Class' law firm DID NOT TAKE CLASS' CASE "FREE" AS A MATTER OF "PRINCIPLE". IT TOOK CLASS' CASE FOR THE MONEY! And, lucky for Class.

Class' law firm immediately realized that Class had MISTAKENLY FAILED to raise the "THRESHOLD QUESTION" of WHETHER HE COULD EVEN FILE AN APPEAL OF HIS CASE IN THE FIRST PLACE (after TWICE waiving that right, in the plea agreement and again in open court). Without addressing and disposing of this legal issue, THERE WOULD BE NO APPEAL. But, Class did not know this. So, Class' law firm "COVERED" FOR HIS MISTAKE by raising this omitted legal issue for him (thereby saving the entire appeal). Unfortunately, the Court Of Appeals held that Class HAD WAIVED HIS RIGHT TO APPEAL.

In response to this adverse ruling, Class' law firm ALONE filed an appeal to the Supreme Court. CLASS WAS NOT INVOLVED IN THIS APPEAL IN ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM (AND WILL NEVER BE SO INVOLVED). The SOLE QUESTION in this new appeal before the Supreme Court is WHETHER A PERSON (ANY PERSON) CAN FILE AN APPEAL challenging the constitutionality of a statute WHICH THEY HAVE ALREADY PLED GUILTY TO VIOLATING. THIS IS THE ONE AND ONLY ISSUE ON APPEAL. See SECOND PAGE, MARKED PAGE "i", BOTTOM PARAGRAPH. 
http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/16-424-brief-of-petitioner.pdf . THIS ISSUE IS A NEW LEGAL ARGUMENT THAT CLASS NEVER KNEW TO RAISE (AND DID NOT RAISE) ANYWHERE AT ANY TIME. Class' amateur legal theories ARE NOT NOW (AND WILL NEVER BE) BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT TO CONSIDER. ONLY REAL LAW CONCEIVED AND PRESENTED BY CLASS' LAW FIRM (NOT ROD CLASS) WILL BE BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT TO CONSIDER. 

THE HOAX: Class FRAUDULENTLY CLAIMS that the Court Of Appeals hired his law firm to represent him because his amateur "paperwork" WAS SO GOOD. Class also FRAUDULENTLY CLAIMS that his law firm and other interested parties who joined in the current appeal did so to "BACK UP" his amateur "paperwork".  But, none of this so.

THE TRUTH: The Court Of Appeals hired Class' law firm to represent him because his amateur "paperwork" WAS SO BAD!  Further, the Court Of Appeals HAD PROOF in its own files that Class was FUNCTIONALLY-ILLITERATE, UNEDUCATED AND MENTALLY ILL. FACT: COURTS DO NOT PROVIDE ATTORNEYS TO LITIGANTS WHO ARE CAPABLE OF REPRESENTING THEMSELVES.  COURTS ONLY PROVIDE ATTORNEYS TO LITIGANTS WHO ARE INCAPABLE OF REPRESENTING THEMSELVES (as was the case here). Further, the other interested parties who joined in the current appeal DO NOT "BACK UP" Class' amateur "paperwork" either! Instead, they ONLY "BACK UP" CLASS' LAW FIRM IN ITS ENTIRELY SEPARATE LEGAL ARGUMENT WHICH CLASS NEVER KNEW ABOUT AND WHICH CLASS NEVER RAISED ANYWHERE AT ANYTIME.

WHAT THOSE INVOLVED DO NOT YET KNOW:

1. Class WAS ACTUALLY ON PROBATION at the time of his ARREST in this case for a previous North Carolina CRIMINAL CONVICTION (which PROBATION was conditioned upon Class NOT POSSESSING ANY "WEAPONS" OF ANY KIND for a year ). Lincoln Cty [North Carolina] Gen. Ct. Of Justice, Dist. Ct. Div. Case No. 13CR050407. Thus, Class WAS IN ILLEGAL POSSESSION of "WEAPONS" at the time of his ARREST in this case (not even considering his additional violation of FEDERAL law). SO, CLASS WAS NOT A "LAW ABIDING CITIZEN" AT THE TIME OF HIS ARREST, as he fraudulently contends.

2.  Class SHOULD NOT HAVE HAD a conceal and carry permit from the state of North Carolina in the first place. This is because Class was ALREADY A CONVICTED FELON before applying for such a permit from that state (and that state DOES NOT issue such permits to CONVICTED FELONS). N.C.G.S. 14_415.12(b)(3).
http://ncleg.net/gascripts/statutes/statutelookup.pl?statute=14-415.12 . Specifically, in 2001, Class was CONVICTED in Ohio of the FELONY POSSESSION (in his car) a fully-loaded, ILLEGALLY-SAWED-OFF Springfield shotgun. Ct. of Common Pleas, Tuscarawas Cty, Ohio, Case No. 2001 CR 12 0298. Ironically, Class WAS ALSO ON PROBATION at the time of that FELONY ARREST for a previous Ohio gun-related CRIME (which constituted another PROBATION VIOLATION by Class). Canton [Ohio] Mun. Ct., Case No. 1999CRB05550). Regardless, Class DID NOT fit any exception to the conceal and carry statute and WAS NOT eligible for the "restoration" of his firearm rights (so as to be issued such a permit from that state). N.C.G.S. 14_415.4 (a), (b), (c), (d), (e) and (j). http://www.ncleg.net/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/HTML/BySection/Chapter_14/GS_14-415.4.html . Thus, Class apparently obtained his conceal and carry permit from North Carolina by FRAUD (itself a criminal act). N.C.G.S. 14_415.4(l) (this is an "L"). http://www.ncleg.net/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/HTML/BySection/Chapter_14/GS_14-415.4.html.  Further, the sentencing judge in this case DID NOT KNOW that Class was ALREADY a CONVICTED FELON at the time of sentencing (Class INTENTIONALLY OMITTED this fact from the pre-sentencing statement upon which the judge and prosecutor relied). In credibly, Class was also  ARRESTED and JAILED TWO MORE TIMES during the pendency of this case, once for refusing to appear at his own trial and once for resisting arrest following a traffic stop. 

3. Unknown to Class, IT WAS ALSO ILLEGAL for him to have "CARRIED" handguns or firearms onto United States Capitol grounds UNDER HIS OWN CONCEAL AND CARRY PERMIT FROM THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. Unknown to Class, his permit from that state EXPRESSLY FORBADE CLASS FROM POSSESSING OR CARRYING HANDGUNS OR FIREARMS ON ANY FEDERAL PROPERTY WHERE SUCH WEAPONS ARE NOT PERMITTED BY FEDERAL LAW. N.C.G.S. 14_415.11(C)(4).
http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/HTML/BySection/Chapter_14/GS_14-415.11.html (See paragraph 4). So, contrary to Class' understanding, his having a North Carolina “conceal and carry” permit DID NOT constitute a "defense" to the federal charges against him in this case. Indeed, it actually constituted ANOTHER VIOLATION of North Carolina law.

4. Even if Class had a "second amendment" defense to "CARRYING" three loaded handguns and one fully loaded rifle onto United States Capitol grounds, Class HAD NO "SECOND AMENDMENT DEFENSE" to "CARRYING" THE OTHER "DANGEROUS WEAPONS" onto United States Capitol grounds WHICH WERE ALSO PROHIBITED BY THE SAME FEDERAL STATUTE (one machete, fourteen knives and daggers, one illegal switch blade, three axes, etc.).

5. It is true that Class may not have realized that he had driven and parked his vehicle (loaded with "DANGEROUS WEAPONS") on United States Capitol grounds. Thus, Class may not have had "mens rea" (knowledge of wrongdoing) in connection with that prohibited act. But, Class DID HAVE "MENS REA" ABOUT BEING ON PROBATION AT THE TIME AND THAT HIS  PROBATION MADE HIS POSSESSION OF ANY "WEAPON" AT THE TIME ILLEGAL.

None of the foregoing facts (in paragraphs 1-5) have yet been made known to any court or prosecutor in this case.


ABOUT ROD CLASS:
Rod Class is a functionally-illiterate amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education WHO HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (OVER 73 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES IN A ROW, AND STILL COUNTING). Further, Class has a long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS involving DELUSIONS, PATHOLOGICAL OPPOSITION/DEFIANCE of AUTHORITY FIGURES and PATHOLOGICAL LYING. Moreover, Class is a MULTI-CONVICTED, WEAPONS RELATED, CONVICTED FELON who also has SEVERAL ADDITIONAL MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS, as well. Because of Class’ well-publicized HATRED of our ELECTED representatives, their appointees and our REPUBLICAN form of government, because of his HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and because of his LENGTHY CRIMINAL HISTORY involving DEADLY WEAPONS, Class has been placed on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST. Most importantly, Class is a PROFESSIONAL HOAXER AND CHARLATAN who is behind a number of legal HOAXES which he created and peddles to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people.

ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:

Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not expose this hoax to harm Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this hoax solely to reduce the catastrophic damage that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Rod Class' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have exposed this hoax here.

The message? Just tell the truth.



  

PurpleSkyz

avatar
Admin

ROD CLASS & THE "MY 'PAPERWORK' WOULD HAVE OVERTURNED EVERY PRIOR CASE HOAX" Today at 11:50 am

snoop4truth


Posts : 20
Join date : 2015-03-21
FIRST, SEE THE HOAX HERE:  http://sitsshow.blogspot.ca/2014/11/rod-class-is-under-house-arrest-here-is.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HWKEmiMZTOc&t=348s  (Do not click on the following blue numbers. They link to wrong video. Instead, GO TO THE VIDEO FIRST. Then, GO TO THE TIMES. They are the EXACT TIMES for the hoax exposed in video above. At:  3:25:-3:50, 5:35-6:05, 8:50-9:20).

THE HOAX: Rod Class falsely claims that the court in his Washington, D.C. case "sealed" the court file in that case because his amateur "paperwork" (contained in that court file) would have "overturned all of the court cases that [ever] came before" it. But, this is not so.

THE TRUTH: The court "sealed" the court file in that case BECAUSE IT CONTAINED ROD CLASS' PSYCHIATRIC RECORDS.

FACT: Because court files are public, courts often "seal" court records TO PROTECT THE PRIVACY of certain types of litigants such as juvenile offenders, victims of sexual assault, parties to an adoption AND PERSONS WHOSE PSYCHIATRIC RECORDS ARE CONTAINED IN THE COURT FILE. (1) Indeed, it is precisely because courts “seal” such court files (or parts thereof) that CLASS’ FOLLOWERS HAVE NEVER KNOWN ABOUT HIS LONG HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS.

THE CASE: Class was CHARGED WITH A FELONY and FACED SERIOUS PRISON TIME. What's more, Class (who only has a high school education and who is functionally illiterate) ASKED THE COURT IF HE COULD REPRESENT HIMSELF. To make matters even worse, Class EXHIBITED SIGNS OF MENTAL ILLNESS. (In this case, the court stated, in writing, that it had become concerned about Class' mental health because his court filings were "SIMPLY INCOMPREHENSIBLE" and because of the delusional "SUBSTANCE" of his written and oral communications with the court,  all signs of mental illness). It is customary in such circumstances for the court to have such a defendant UNDERGO A PSYCHIATRIC EXAMINATION before making a decision as to whether such a defendant may represent himself. (2) The purpose of such a psychiatric examination is to determine whether such a defendant is mentally competent TO MAKE THE DECISION TO REPRESENT HIMSELF. The purpose of such a psychiatric examination IS NOT TO DETERMINE WHETHER SUCH A DEFENDANT IS MENTALLY CAPABLE OF ACTUALLY REPRESENTING HIMSELF. (Under the law, the court must allow such a defendant to represent himself if he is mentally competent to make the decision to represent himself EVEN IF, AS HERE, HE WAS NOT MENTALLY CAPABLE OF ACTUALLY REPRESENTING HIMSELF.). (3) So, on February 3rd, 2014, the court ordered Class to undergo a psychiatric examination and appointed a psychiatrist for that purpose. (4) After the psychiatric examination, the clerk filed Class' psychiatric records in the court file. So, the court properly "sealed" the court file TO PREVENT THE PUBLIC FROM HAVING ACCESS TO CLASS' PSYCHIATRIC RECORDS. (5)

RESULTS:  Based on all the evidence, the court determined that Class WAS NOT mentally capable of actually representing himself. While OBVIOUSLY TRUE, this determination was legally irrelevant. (Under the law, the court is only supposed to determine whether such a defendant is mentally competent enough to make the decision to represent himself.). Clearly, the court here was sympathetic towards Class under the circumstances and was going out of its way to prevent him from committing "legal suicide". (6) Regardless, the court made a second determination and found that Class was mentally competent ENOUGH to make the decision to represent himself (despite correctly finding that Class WAS NOT mentally capable of actually representing himself).

THE "PAPERWORK": Amateur legal theories are pure "pretend" and "make believe" AND CANNOT "OVERTURN" ANYTHING. The amateur "paperwork" that Class misguidedly brags about in this hoax was 36 "motions" reflecting classic amateur legal theories ("capital letters", "fictional entities", "natural persons" "corporations", "living flesh and blood man", "with a soul", "UCC", "registered trade name", "Coram Nobis", etc.). To see just how likely it was that Class' amateur "paperwork" would have "overturned all of the court cases that [ever] came before [it]", simply click on the first link below. This is the court's ACTUAL RESPONSE to the very amateur "paperwork" that Class misguidedly brags about in this HOAX. Look for the term, "DENIED", after EACH and EVERY such amateur legal theory.

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2757756755752158953&q=soul+human+%22coram+nobis%22+irrelevant+inapplicable+relevant+denied+business+%22registered+trade%22+%22uniform+commercial+code%22+natural+person+persons+%22flesh+and+blood%22+corporate+corporation+fictional+entity+entities+%22capital+letters%22+%22utterly+incomprehensible&hl=en&as_sdt=40003

FOOTNOTES:
1).
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9360424473304630524&q=%22in+a+public+forum%22+%22mental+health+information%22+%22medical+records+under+seal%22+%22I+conclude+that+there+is+good+cause+to+place+plaintiff%27s+certified%22+%22I+recognize+plaintiff%27s%22+%22concerns+regarding+the+availability+of+his+sensitive%22+%22mental+health+information%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=5601006984893862219&q=%22compiled+by+a+state+licensed%22+%22shall+be+filed+with+the+clerk,+who+will+seal+such+report%22+%22a+court-ordered+private+evaluation+report%22+%22mental+health+professional%22+&hl=en&scisbd=2&as_sdt=40006 (at footnote 4 near end of case)

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=6844040484297740765&q=%22sealing+a+psychological+evaluation+report%22+%22a+common+law+or%22+%22avoid+substantial+injury+to+a+party+by+disclosure+of+matters+protected+by%22+%22privacy+right%22+%22the+following+records%22+%22shall+be+confidential%22+&hl=en&scisbd=2&as_sdt=40006

http://www.illinois17th.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=382&Itemid=75  (at 16.02 (b) and (d))

2).
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9638202248861590589&q=%22as+the+hearing+continued%22+%22knowledge+of+the+federal+rules+of+evidence+and+criminal+procedure%22+%22his+education.+mental+health+history%22+%22the+court+asked+wiggins+about%22+%22represent+yourself%22+conspiracy+%22to+distribute%22+%22possess+with+intent%22+heroin&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

3).
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13448720628873766473&q=ability+%22not+the%22+%22to+represent+himself%22+%22to+waive%22+%22right+to+counsel%22+%22no+bearing%22+competently+competence+competent+%22whether+he+is%22+%22not+relevant%22+%22legal+knowledge%22+%22choosing+self-representation+must+do+so+competently%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 (at the very end of section "A.")

4).
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?68235-Rod-Class-ordered-for-Psych-Evaluation

5). Other courts have also ordered Class to undergo similar psychiatric examinations. In the “Judge DALE forgery” entitled, "The Great American Adventure: Secrets Of America", Rodney DALE Class (while pretending to be "Judge DALE") wrote TWO ENTIRE, SEPARATE PARAGRAPHS about HIS OWN many, previous experiences with similar court-ordered psychiatric examinations and hospitalizations. To read these two separate paragraphs, go to page 107.
http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/THE-GREAT-AMERICAN-ADVENTURE.pdf. OR go to page 110. https://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/the-great-american-adventure-sm-book-format_pdf.pdf  Class made a similar admission in the “Judge DALE forgery” entitled “The Matrix And The US Constitution” (while pretending to be “Judge DALE”) on page 5 at end of paragraph 2. https://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/the-matrix-and-the-us-constitution-sm-bk-format1.pdf. See also "Sorry It Has Come To This" in Episode 917 dated 1-29-15. http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=48361&pageNumber=5&pageSize=15

According to documents filed by amateur legal theorist, Carl Miller (real name "Richard John Champion") himself and found on
Pacer.gov., he has had similar experiences to those of Class with respect to court-ordered psychiatric examinations and hospitalizations, as have many other such amateur legal theorists. http://privateaudio.homestead.com/__lentz-isms_v2.doc . http://redcatsboards.yuku.com/topic/8216/Fraud-artists-sentenced-to-prison#.WDYUm1KFPIU (at the 3rd complete sentence). 

6). WHAT JUDGES KNOW THAT CLASS AND HIS FOLLOWERS DO NOT:
[url=http://www.aija.org.au/acag09/Papers/Lester 1.pdf][url=http://www.aija.org.au/acag09/Papers/Lester 1.pdf]http://www.aija.org.au/acag09/Papers/Lester%201.pdf[/url][/url]
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.582.832&rep=rep1&type=pdf
http://jaapl.org/content/45/1/62
http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/doi/abs/10.1176/ajp.59.2.279
http://www.nicolastato.com.ar/esp/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=87:querulous&catid=7:categartfilosofia&Itemid=8
http://www.tjeffersonlrev.org/sites/tjeffersonlrev.org/files/30-02-09-Diesen.pdf
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2753/RPO1061-0405020251

Class has already been JUDICIALLY DECLARED such a VEXATIOUS LITIGANT within the meaning the foregoing PSYCHIATRIC PUBLICATIONS. Class v. Gwin [the judge in a case that Class had just LOST] et al. [means "and others", including 30 governmental officials], Case No.
5:06-CV-1465, U. S. Dist. Ct. N.D. Ohio (Akron). Filed 06-14-06. Dismissed (means THROWN OUT OF COURT) 07-25-06. (available on pacer.gov.). See also http://www.topix.com/forum/city/archdale-nc/TT9PLIDASAV6NENR8 (Here, Class seeks help of other amateurs with the same PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS.).

ABOUT ROD CLASS:
Rod Class is a functionally-illiterate amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education WHO HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (OVER 73 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES IN A ROW, AND STILL COUNTING). Further, Class has a long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS involving DELUSIONS, PATHOLOGICAL OPPOSITION/DEFIANCE of AUTHORITY FIGURES and PATHOLOGICAL LYING. Moreover, Class is a MULTI-CONVICTED, WEAPONS RELATED, CONVICTED FELON who also has SEVERAL ADDITIONAL MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS, as well. Because of Class’ well-publicized HATRED of our ELECTED representatives, their appointees and our REPUBLICAN form of government, because of his HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and because of his LENGTHY CRIMINAL HISTORY involving DEADLY WEAPONS, Class has been placed on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST. Most importantly, Class is a PROFESSIONAL HOAXER AND CHARLATAN who is behind a number of legal HOAXES which he created and peddles to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people.

ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:

Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not expose this hoax to harm Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this hoax solely to reduce the catastrophic damage that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Rod Class' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have exposed this hoax here.

The message? Just tell the truth.



  

PurpleSkyz

avatar
Admin

ROD CLASS & "ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES ARE 'PRIVATE ENTITIES' HOAX" (A.K.A. THE "BOMBSHELL: FOURTH ADMINITRATIVE RULING HOAX") Today at 11:39 am

snoop4truth


Posts : 19
Join date : 2015-03-21
FIRST, SEE THE HOAX HERE: http://fourwinds10.com/siterun_data/government/corporate_u_s/news.php?q=1350315108 . http://wp.nesara.news/?p=26944 . http://www.meetup.com/fr-FR/WE-ARE-CHANGE-LAS-VEGAS/messages/43090012/ . https://scannedretina.com/2012/10/15/govt-offices-are-vacant/. And, speaking of "BOMBSHELL" hoaxes, for more "BOMBSHELL" hoaxes by one of the same charlatans involved here, go to: http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2014/06/bombshell-nasa-war-document-exposed-extinction-of-humanity-deborah-tavares-sheila-zilinski-video-dont-miss-this-2978738.html
 http://meetnigerians.net/members/videos.php?cmd=w&t=bombshell+nasa+war+document+exposed%3A+extinction+of+humanity-deborah+tavares&v=LIIw5xhG5Ho&ch=UCKnnee98ihoTszlL_G6tQ6Q .
http://www.takdownloadfree.com/-LIIw5xhG5Ho/Bombshell-NASA-War-Document-Exposed-Extinction-of-Humanity-Deborah-Tavares.html .


THE HOAX SIMPLIFIED: This HOAX arose out of TWO cases that Class LOST. In BOTH of these two cases, Class sued BOTH private corporations AND government agencies IN THE SAME CASE. Like all of the cases that Class files, he LOST these two cases too. In their DISMISSALS of these two cases (throwing them out of court), the judges in BOTH OF THESE TWO CASES referred to the private corporations that Class had sued and to the government agencies that Class had sued SEPARATELY (one ruling DISMISSING the government agencies that Class had sued and a different ruling DISMISSING the private corporations that Class had sued). But, in trying to explain away these two LOSSES to his followers, Class fraudulently “SWITCHED” the judges’ words about the private corporations that Class had sued with the judges’ words about the government agencies that Class had sued. By “SWITCHING” the judges’ words about the private corporations with the judges’ words about the government agencies, Class fraudulently created the ILLUSION that when the judges were actually talking about the private corporations, they were instead talking about all of the government agencies. This fraudulent “SWITCH” of the judges words (from one group of defendants to the other group of defendants) created the ILLUSION that when the judges were actually referring to THE PRIVATE CORPORATIONS  that Class had sued as “corporate appellees” or as a SINGLE “private entitY” as applicable, they were instead referring to “ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES” that Class had sued as “corporate appellees” or as “private entitIES”, as applicable. But, that was not so.

THE TRUTH. FIRST CASE: In this case, Class sued BOTH private corporations AND government agencies IN THE SAME CASE. In his DISMISSAL of the first case (throwing it out of court), the judge used the term, “Corporate Appellees”, when referring (BY NAME) to a private bank and to two private insurance companies that Class had sued. But, instead of telling his followers the truth, Class fraudulently told his followers that in his DISMISSAL of this case, the judge was instead referring to “ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES" that Class had sued in the same case as “corporate appellees”. This fraudulent “SWITCH” of the judge’s words (from one type of defendant to the other type of defendant) is how Class reached the desired (and entirely fictional) conclusion that the judge had ruled that "ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES" were “corporate appellees”. Unfortunately for Class, the truth about this hoax can be found here. Go to page 6, lines 13-15.
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-ca10-07-05026/pdf/USCOURTS-ca10-07-05026-0.pdf .  After reading what the judge in this case actually said, ask yourself this. Did the judge in this case really refer to “ALL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES” that Class sued as “corporate appellees” OR instead, did the judge in this case actually refer ONLY to the private bank and the two private insurance companies that Class used as “corporate appellees"?
        
THE TRUTH. SECOND CASE: In this case, Class sued a STATE-WIDE government "agency", a “LOCAL unit of government” and a SINGLE “private entitY”, ALL IN THE SAME CASE. Specifically, Class filed an administrative suit against the North Carolina Department of Transportation (a STATE-WIDE government "agency" which was immune from suit by statute), against a “LOCAL” city police department (over which the administrative court had no jurisdiction because it was a "LOCAL" “UNIT OF GOVERNMENT", rather than a STATE-WIDE "agency" under the Governor) and against a SINGLE private contractor that sold vehicle license plates for the State of North Carolina (over which the administrative court had no jurisdiction because it was a SINGLE “private entitY”). In his DISMISSAL of this second case (throwing it out of court), the judge used the SINGULAR term, “private entitY” when referring ONLY to that SINGLE “private entitY” that Class had sued. But, instead of telling his followers the truth, Class fraudulently told his followers that in his DISMISSAL, the judge used the PLURAL term, “private entitIES” and fraudulently told his followers that the judge was instead referring to ALL THREE DEFENDANTS that Class had sued as “private entitIES” (including the state-wide government "agency" and the “local unit of government” that Class had sued). This fraudulent “SWITCH” of the judge’s actual word, “entitY” (a SINGULAR term) to the FRAUDULENT word, “entitIES” (a PLURAL term) is how Class reached the desired (and entirely fictional) conclusion that the judge had ruled "ALL GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES" were “private entitIES” (a PLURAL term that does not appear in the ruling). Unfortunately for Class, the truth about this hoax can be found here. Go to “Conclusions Of Law” paragraph. 4, sentence 2. (Look for the SINGULAR term, "entitY".). 
https://unmasker4maine.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/nc_certification_copy_complete.pdf . After reading what the judge in this case actually said in this case, ask yourself this. Did the judge in this case really refer to “ALL THREE DEFENDANTS” that Rod Class had sued as “private entitIES”, a PLURAL term OR instead, did the judge in this case actually refer ONLY to the SINGLE private contractor that sold license plates for the State of North Carolina as a SINGLE “private entitY”, a SINGULAR term?

In fairness to Class, who only has a high school education and who is functionally illiterate, CLASS  MISTAKENLY BELIEVED THAT HE HAD SUED THREE GOVERNMENT AGENCIES in this case. That is why he sued all three defendants in state administrative court. (He mistakenly believed that all three defendants were state-wide government "agencies" over which state administrative courts usually have jurisdiction.). But, in fact in this case, Class had actually sued ONLY TWO GOVERNMENT AGENCIES (OR “UNITS”) and a SINGLE PRIVATE CONTRACTOR that sold vehicle license plates for the State of North Carolina.

Class mistakenly believed that the SINGLE “private entitY” that he had mistakenly sued in this case was a government agency because he did not know that FOR MORE THAN HALF A CENTURY, THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA HAS USED PRIVATE CONTRACTORS TO SELL VEHICLE LICENSE PLATES TO NORTH CAROLINA VEHICLE OWNERS. If Class had bothered to do a little research before filing suit, he would have discovered that the SINGLE “private entitY” that he mistakenly sued (in the mistaken belief that it was a government agency) was a not a governmental agency at all. Unknown to Class, almost all of the vehicle license plate agencies in the State Of North Carolina (outside the Charlotte  & Raleigh areas) are now owned and operated by private contractors of the type that he mistakenly sued in this case (in the mistaken belief that it was a government "agency"). Despite that the State of North Carolina uses private contractors to sell its vehicle license plates, IT DOES NOT USE PRIVATE CONTRACTORS FOR ITS LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES OR IN CONNECTION WITH ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY-TYPE FUNCTION. It only uses private contractors to sell vehicle license plates (includes titling services). This has been PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE to everyone except Rod Class for over half a century.

WHAT CLASS DID NOT (AND DOES NOT NOW) KNOW:
http://www.ncleg.net/ped/reports/documents/tags/tags_report.pdf (Scroll down to "BACKGROUND" on the 4th page, marked "page 2").

https://apps.ncdot.gov/newsreleases/details.aspx?r=10646

http://www.wral.com/dmv-defends-system-of-independent-license-plate-offices/11753455/

http://myfox8.com/2015/01/15/dmv-seeks-applications-for-new-license-plate-agency-in-stokes-county/

http://www.journalnow.com/news/local/n-c-division-of-motor-vehicles-seeks-contract-applicants/article_697fc01e-5d50-11e3-8887-001a4bcf6878.html

CLASS MAKES MISTAKES ON TOP OF MISTAKES: So, not knowing any better, when the judge in this case DISMISSED (threw out) Class' lawsuit against this SINGLE private contractor on the grounds that it was a SINGLE"private entitY" (and not a STATE-WIDE government "agency" over which the administrative court usually has jurisdiction), Class mistakenly believed he had "forced" the courts to "admit" that a SINGLE "private entitY" was a SINGLE "private entitY" (something that everybody except Class has known for over half a century). This means that Class' own IGNORANCE (of the fact that North Carolina has used private contractors to sell vehicle license plates for more than half a century) led to him reach the mistaken conclusion that he had miraculously become a "legal genius". To this very day, Class does not know that the SINGLE “private entitY” that he mistakenly sued (in the mistaken belief that it was a government agency) had actually been a SINGLE "private entitY" all along.

(CONTINUED ON THE "PROPERTY INTO OTHER NAMES HOAX")


ABOUT ROD CLASS:
Rod Class is a functionally-illiterate amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education WHO HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (OVER 73 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES IN A ROW, AND STILL COUNTING). Further, Class has a long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS involving DELUSIONS, PATHOLOGICAL OPPOSITION/DEFIANCE of AUTHORITY FIGURES and PATHOLOGICAL LYING. Moreover, Class is a MULTI-CONVICTED, WEAPONS RELATED, CONVICTED FELON who also has SEVERAL ADDITIONAL MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS, as well. Because of Class’ well-publicized HATRED of our ELECTED representatives, their appointees and our REPUBLICAN form of government, because of his HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and because of his LENGTHY CRIMINAL HISTORY involving DEADLY WEAPONS, Class has been placed on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST. Most importantly, Class is a PROFESSIONAL HOAXER AND CHARLATAN who is behind a number of legal HOAXES which he created and peddles to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people.

ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:

Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not expose this hoax to harm Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this hoax solely to reduce the catastrophic damage that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Rod Class' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have exposed this hoax here.

The message? Just tell the truth.



  

PurpleSkyz

avatar
Admin

ROD CLASS & THE "14TH AMENDMENT, SECTION 4 BOUNTY HUNTER HOAX" Today at 11:26 am

snoop4truth


Posts : 18
Join date : 2015-03-21
FIRST, SEE THE HOAX HERE: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Private+Attorney+General%22&biw=1366&bih=622&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwir6YX-5t_OAhVJ2B4KHQQzC_kQ_AUICCgD&dpr=1#tbm=isch&q=%22Private+Attorney+General%22+%22Rod+Class%22&*

THE HOAX: Rod Class falsely claims to be a "14th Amendment, Section 4, Bounty Hunter" and that as such, he is EXTREMELY powerful, EXTREMELY important and that he represents an EXTREME threat to government agencies and officials in that imaginary capacity. But, none of this is so. 

BACKGROUND: Class mistakenly believes that all governmental agencies have public money that they should not have (the subject of a different comment). So, he set out to recover that public money and created an appropriate TITLE, COSTUME, VEHICLE and some imaginary POWERS to help him in that regard. For his title, Class picked the term, "14 Amendment, Section 4 Bounty Hunter". This is because both the term, "PUBLIC DEBT" and the term, "BOUNTIES" actually appear in  the fourteenth amendment, section 4 and because such a title would help create the IMAGE he wanted. But, Class should have researched these terms first.

Class mistakenly defines a "14th Amendment, Section 4, Bounty Hunter" as "Public Debt Collector" and/or a "Public Bounty Hunter". These mistaken definitions (along with his description of his imaginary role in that imaginary capacity) reflect TWO FUNDAMENTAL MISTAKES that Class makes about the fourteenth amendment, section 4. First, Class mistakenly believes that the term, "public debt" means MONEY THAT OTHERS OWE TO THE PUBLIC. But, this is not so. (The term, "public debt", ACTUALLY MEANS MONEY THAT THE PUBLIC OWES TO OTHERS). Second, Class mistakenly believes that the "bounties" referred to in the fourteenth amendment, section 4 are "bounties" that are owed and paid to those who find and recover MONEY THAT IS CURRENTLY OWED TO THE PUBLIC NOW. But, this is also not so. (The term, "bounties", referred to in the fourteenth amendment, section 4 ACTUALLY MEANS THE "BOUNTIES" THAT THE PUBLIC ONCE OWED (AND PAID) TO THOSE WHO HELPED THE UNION DEFEAT THE CONFEDERATE SOUTH DURING THE CIVIL WAR OVER 150 YEARS AGO.). But, Class does not know this.  Not surprisingly, Class has NEVER found any missing public money, has NEVER recovered any missing public money and has NEVER been paid a "bounty" in connection with finding any missing public money.

Regardless, in pretending to be a "14th Amendment, Section 4 Bounty Hunter" (as he mistakenly defines it), Class: 1). claims to have a number of imaginary "duties" that he is "obligated" to perform in that imaginary capacity; 2). signs and seals his court papers to that effect; 3). had made, and often wears a FAKE, homemade "COSTUME"  falsely indicating such; 3). marked his used Jeep with FAKE vinyl decals falsely indicating such; 4). adorned the "backdrop" of his backyard radio/video studio/set with a FAKE wall plague falsely indicating such; and 5). files lawsuits and disrupts court proceedings pretending to be such. 

THE TRUTH:
1). The term, “Public Debt” means MONEY THAT THE PUBLIC OWES TO OTHERS (not the other way around).

2).  The fourteenth amendment, section 4 DOES NOT CREATE OR ENFORCE A "BOUNTY"  FOR THOSE WHO RECOVER MONEY THAT IS CURRENTLY OWED TO THE PUBLIC NOW.

3). The fourteenth amendment, section 4 ONCE REQUIRED THE PUBLIC TO PAY "BOUNTIES" TO THOSE (AND ONLY TO THOSE) WHO "SUPPRESS[ED]... INSURRECTION... [AND] REBELLION" (REFERRING TO THE CONFEDERATE SOUTH DURING THE CIVIL WAR OVER 150 YEARS AGO).

The fourteenth amendment, Section 4 reads:

"The validity of the public debt of the Unites States [money that the public owes to others], ... INCLUDING DEBTS INCURRED [by the public] FOR PAYMENT OF PENSIONS AND BOUNTIES [to others] FOR SERVICES [rendered] IN SUPPRESSING INSURRECTION OR REBELLION [referring to the Confederate South during the Civil War] SHALL NOT BE QUESTIONED [means 'must be paid']."
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/amendmentxiv

Id. Thus, the fourteenth amendment, section 4 IS EXCLUSIVELY ABOUT MONEY/DEBTS THAT THE PUBLIC ONCE OWED (AND PAID) TO OTHERS, NOT ABOUT MONEY/DEBTS THAT OTHERS CURRENTLY OWE TO THE PUBLIC NOW. Further, the ONLY "bounties" created or enforced by the fourteenth amendment WERE THOSE "BOUNTIES" THAT THE PUBLIC ONCE OWED (AND PAID) TO THOSE WHO HELPED THE UNION DEFEAT THE CONFEDERATE SOUTH DURING THE CIVIL WAR OVER 150 YEARS AGO. The 14th amendment DOES NOT CREATE OR ENFORCE "BOUNTIES" FOR THOSE FIND MONEY/DEBTS THAT OTHERS CURRENTLY OWE TO THE PUBLIC NOW. But, Class does not know this.

4). This provision in the United States Constitution was written immediately following the Civil War in direct response to a specific threat made by Southern states and their sympathizers. At the time (150 years ago), the Union had promised to pay "PENSIONS" and "BOUNTIES" to people who had helped the Union defeat the confederate South during the Civil War (to which the terms, "INSURRECTION" and "REBELLION", refer in the 14th amendment, section 4). The Southern states objected to the payment of these "PENSIONS" and "BOUNTIES" (effectively "rewards" to people for defeating the confederate South during the Civil War) and they threatened to pass federal legislation banning the payment of these "PENSIONS" and BOUNTIES" in the event that they ever became a majority in Congress. SO, THE SOLE PURPOSE OF THIS SECTION OF THE CONSTITUTION WAS TO PREEMPTIVELY NULLIFY ANY FUTURE EFFORTS ON THE PART OF THE SOUTHERN STATES TO PASS FEDERAL LEGISLATION BANNING THE PAYMENT OF "PENSIONS" AND "BOUNTIES" TO PEOPLE THAT HAD HELPED THE UNION DEFEAT THE CONFEDERATE SOUTH DURING THE CIVIL WAR OVER 150 YEARS AGO. But, Rod Class does not know this.

5). CONCLUSION:  Because it is impossible for Class to travel back in time to "SUPPRESS... [AN] INSURRECTION OR REBELLION" DURING THE CIVIL WAR, Class IS NOT a "14th Amendment, Section 4, Bounty Hunter". Indeed, he doesn’t even know the meaning of the term.

THE REAL "FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, SECTION 4 BOUNTY":

https://www.google.com/search?q=union+%22civil+war%22+bounty&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiiloiYudTSAhXKQSYKHVL5Dv8Q_AUICCgD&biw=1366&bih=613

https://www.britannica.com/event/Bounty-System

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bounty_jumper 

http://www.lib.umd.edu/civilwarwomen/exhibition/10bounties.html

http://www.oah.org/site/assets/documents/09_JAH_1966_murdock.pdf

http://www.cincinnaticwrt.org/data/ccwrt_history/talks_text/moffat_soldiers_pay.html

WHAT A REAL "FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT, SECTION 4 BOUNTY HUNTER" LOOKS LIKE:

http://civilwartalk.com/threads/a-rogues-gallery-bounty-hunters.110966/

https://www.google.com/search?q=union+soldier+civil+war+bounty&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjB4pzk09TSAhUJfiYKHfoFBfEQ_AUICCgD&biw=1366&bih=613#tbm=isch&q=union+soldier+%22civil+war%22+&*

THE LAW:

THIS SECTION:
1). CANNOT be used as the basis for "bounties" for services that DO NOT ARISE OUT OF THE CIVIL WAR.
2). CANNOT be used to adversely affect the property rights of U.S. GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS.
3). DOES NOT even "come into play" UNLESS A GOVERNMENT "questions" (REFUSES TO PAY) a debt THAT THE PUBLIC OWES TO OTHERS. 

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10653104269145873517&q=%22of+United+States+officials%22+%22or+to+adversely+affect+the+property+rights%22+%22provide+no+authority+for+plaintiffs+to+establish+an+irrevocable+bounty+in+this+case+%22+%22sections+3+and+4+of+the+fourteenth+amendment%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 .

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2388571488588603535&q=+%22by+any+future+congress+controlled+by+southerners+and+their+sympathizers%22+%22in+fighting+the+civil+war%22+%22the+fourteenth+amendment+was+intended+to+prevent+the+questioning+of+the+war+debt+incurred+by+the+union%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10653104269145873517&q=%22in+fighting+the+civil+war%22+%22section+4+of+the+fourteenth+amendment+was+intended+to+prevent+the+questioning+of+the+war+debt+incurred+by+the+union%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2388571488588603535&q=%22This+section+is+only+brought+into+play+when+some+state+or+federal+government+agency+questions+a+debt%22+%22This+little+used+provision+of+the+fourteenth+amendment%22+%22No+such+questioning+occurred+here%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=10653104269145873517&q=%22questions+a+debt%22+%22state+or+federal+government+agency%22+%22is+only+brought+into+play+when+some%22+%22Section+4+of+the+fourteenth+amendment%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

FAKE VEHICLE:
http://www.nc4x4.com/forum/threads/douche-bag-attractant.159266/
  
FAKE COSTUME:
(Go to the following videos FIRST. Then, go to times below.).
1).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZEYI-PTzUc&list=PLfuM34UqkW0c0UDc6psQfXTA0a1t-O7ux (at 1:35).
2).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCisCCMQqng (at 10:15).

FAKE PLAQUE:
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Private+Attorney+General%22&biw=1366&bih=622&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwir6YX-5t_OAhVJ2B4KHQQzC_kQ_AUICCgD&dpr=1#tbm=isch&q=%22Private+Attorney+General%22+%22Rod+Class%22&*

FAKE VIDEOS:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7EVPSf-9gw&t=61s (note video TITLE).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCisCCMQqng&t=2647s (describing his imaginary powers and duties).

FAKE PAPERS:
[url=https://itnj.org/wp-content/uploads/ITNJ/ITNJ_Cases/rod_class/dc_case_files/130618_1st DC Filing_FIRST_COMPLAINT_JUNE_18TH_2013.pdf][url=https://itnj.org/wp-content/uploads/ITNJ/ITNJ_Cases/rod_class/dc_case_files/130618_1st DC Filing_FIRST_COMPLAINT_JUNE_18TH_2013.pdf]https://itnj.org/wp-content/uploads/ITNJ/ITNJ_Cases/rod_class/dc_case_files/130618_1st%20DC%20Filing_FIRST_COMPLAINT_JUNE_18TH_2013.pdf[/url][/url]

It would be funny if it weren't so sad. So very, very sad.


ROD CLASS SEMINARS & CLASSES & "THREE TIMES YOUR MONEY BACK!"
If you have PAID to attend ANY SEMINAR (or "webinar" or "class") involving Rod Class' IN RELIANCE of his claims that: 1). He is a "Private Attorney General"; 2). He can "TRAIN" you to be a "Private Attorney General"; 3) He KNOWS THE LAW; or that 4). He has "won" ANY case in ANY court, THEN YOU MAY RECOVER THREE (3) TIMES YOUR MONEY BACK, PLUS ATTORNEY FEES, PLUS OTHER LEGAL COSTS UNDER FEDERAL RICO!

THE LAW ON ROD CLASS SEMINARS & CLASSES UNDER FEDERAL RICO:

1).
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=17967775573114200296&q=costs+%22attorneys%27+fees%22+trebeled+punitive+damages+%22legal+system%22+%22tax+laws%22+%22we+affirm%22+fraud+misrepresentation+%22they+could+lawfully+reduce+their+income+tax+liability+to+zero%22++promised+RICO+seminars+seminar+treble&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

2).
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1188670168177314413&q=denied+cost+%22attorney%27s+fee%22+threefold+%22ranged+from+%24495-1695%22+%22the+fee+for+the+four-day+real+estate%22+damages+%22attorneys%27+fees%22+costs+RICO+seminars+seminar+treble&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

3).
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=13603216179463577076&q=denied+%22turn+anyone+into%22+%22will+show+you%22+%22can+teach+you%22+success+offering+%22real+estate%22+%22master+strategies%22+denies+cost+%22attorney%27s+fee%22+threefold+damages+%22purporting+to+teach+Defendant%27s%22+RICO+seminars+seminar+treble&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

4).
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=14610347749862677361&q=trebled+costs+threefold+%22attorney%27s+fees%22+damages+%22as+capable%22+%22they+had+improved+their+credit+scores%22+%22represented+that%22++%22false+and+known+to+be+so%22+%22attorneys+fees%22+%22credit+repair%22+%22repairing+broken+credit%22+RICO+seminars+seminar+threefold&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

EXAMPLE (BELOW) OF SUCH A ROD CLASS RICO "SEMINAR" OR "CLASS":

(Begin Quote)

>> Potential PAG Seminar at the end of August ! <<

This is a P.A.G. Inquiry only at this time ! In the last six months,
we have had new interest asking when the next P.A.G. Seminar
might be. We have a Camp Ground available with an air-conditioned
auditorium that will seat 30 people. This next P.A.G. Seminar can
be confirmed by 30 people confirming with a deposit donation
of a non-refundable pledge of $300 cash to help with setting up costs.
The rest of the fee donation to attend the next P.A.G. Seminar of $700
cash would be due at the door. The total P.A.G. Seminar cost will be
$1000 which includes FIVE 8 hour days of training with the following
weekend Saturday/Sunday reserved for one-on-one consultations
with Rod Class and Carl Weston. As some might know we have
worked on many types of cases...assisting with Administrative and
Judicial cases through the years and have many WINS including
money Judgments. If you feel you might be able to attend the next
P.A.G. Seminar and help out with a $300 Deposit for costs to set up
please forward your interest response to: PrivateGeneral@
hughes.net

PLEASE put "August PAG Seminar" in the subject line !

The P.A.G. Seminar date will be set for late August. 

Note: Motel and food costs will be your responsibility.

(End Quote)

ABOUT ROD CLASS:
Rod Class is a functionally-illiterate amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education WHO HAS LOST EVERY SINGLE CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (OVER 73 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES IN A ROW, AND STILL COUNTING). Further, Class has a long history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS involving DELUSIONS, PATHOLOGICAL OPPOSITION/DEFIANCE of AUTHORITY FIGURES and PATHOLOGICAL LYING. Moreover, Class is a MULTI-CONVICTED, WEAPONS RELATED, CONVICTED FELON who also has SEVERAL ADDITIONAL MISDEMEANOR CONVICTIONS, as well. Because of Class’ well-publicized HATRED of our ELECTED representatives, their appointees and our REPUBLICAN form of government, because of his HISTORY OF PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and because of his LENGTHY CRIMINAL HISTORY involving DEADLY WEAPONS, Class has been placed on the United States TERRORIST WATCH LIST. Most importantly, Class is a PROFESSIONAL HOAXER AND CHARLATAN who is behind a number of legal HOAXES which he created and peddles to INTENTIONALLY DEFRAUD the American people.

ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:

Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes online hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not expose this hoax to harm Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this hoax solely to reduce the catastrophic damage that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day. Had it not been for Rod Class' role in the "Judge DALE Hoax", Snoop4truth would not have exposed this hoax here.

The message? Just tell the truth.



  

View previous topic View next topic Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum