Latest topics
» Solar Nebula Hypothesis Ready for History's Dustbin?
Split Hearings: The Assange Extradition Case Drags On EmptyToday at 11:06 am by PurpleSkyz

» A Lot Going on at the ISS
Split Hearings: The Assange Extradition Case Drags On EmptyToday at 11:04 am by PurpleSkyz

» Shadow People - The Mysterious Dark Watchers
Split Hearings: The Assange Extradition Case Drags On EmptyToday at 10:58 am by PurpleSkyz

» COVID19 UPDATES - U.S. Marines and Navy Prepare to Execute Pandemic Plan plus MORE
Split Hearings: The Assange Extradition Case Drags On EmptyToday at 10:47 am by PurpleSkyz

» Strange space vehicles seem to appear out of flashes of light
Split Hearings: The Assange Extradition Case Drags On EmptyToday at 10:30 am by PurpleSkyz

» Police Obtain Warrant for Ancestry.com DNA Database
Split Hearings: The Assange Extradition Case Drags On EmptyToday at 10:28 am by PurpleSkyz

» Assange most important symbol of press freedom today – journalist
Split Hearings: The Assange Extradition Case Drags On EmptyToday at 10:26 am by PurpleSkyz

» DR. JOSEPH FARRELL: PERMINDEX PAPERS II NASA UFO JFK ASSASSINATION DEEP STATE BEARER BONDS MYSTERY!
Split Hearings: The Assange Extradition Case Drags On EmptyToday at 10:18 am by PurpleSkyz

» Meanwhile in London.........
Split Hearings: The Assange Extradition Case Drags On EmptyToday at 6:15 am by bs4ever

» POOPness for FEB 21: RELEASE... NOT REALLY JUST SEND ME MORE MONEY!!!
Split Hearings: The Assange Extradition Case Drags On EmptyToday at 12:56 am by PurpleSkyz

» ‘Food As Medicine’, Return to Nature
Split Hearings: The Assange Extradition Case Drags On EmptyYesterday at 8:02 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Jenny McCarthy talks to Blue Chicken Cult Leaders about their documentary "The Conman Secret."
Split Hearings: The Assange Extradition Case Drags On EmptyYesterday at 7:54 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Body Language: Mike Bloomberg First Debate Performance
Split Hearings: The Assange Extradition Case Drags On EmptyYesterday at 7:53 pm by PurpleSkyz

» BiNaural beats study music - improve memory and concentration
Split Hearings: The Assange Extradition Case Drags On EmptyYesterday at 2:40 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Steve Bassett Brilliantly Explains Why UFO Disclosure Is Closer Than Ever Before
Split Hearings: The Assange Extradition Case Drags On EmptyYesterday at 2:33 pm by PurpleSkyz

» New snail species named after Greta Thunberg
Split Hearings: The Assange Extradition Case Drags On EmptyYesterday at 2:29 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Japan to launch Phobos sample-return mission
Split Hearings: The Assange Extradition Case Drags On EmptyYesterday at 2:22 pm by PurpleSkyz

» This Already Happened on our Earth... !! 2020 . Events From all over The World
Split Hearings: The Assange Extradition Case Drags On EmptyYesterday at 11:09 am by PurpleSkyz

» Conference on Extraterrestrials in the Vatican: This is what happened
Split Hearings: The Assange Extradition Case Drags On EmptyYesterday at 11:07 am by PurpleSkyz

» Soğmatar Built By The Lost Aliens of Malta?
Split Hearings: The Assange Extradition Case Drags On EmptyYesterday at 11:01 am by PurpleSkyz





***********

CLICK THE SUBSCRIBE BUTTON BELOW TO RECEIVE OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER

A 2ND EMAIL COMPLETES THE ACTIVATION PROCESS




CLICK THE PURPLE BUTTON TO VIEW OUR LATEST POSTS







You are not connected. Please login or register

OUT OF MIND » LEGAL DEFENDERS & FREEDOM FIGHTERS » JULIAN ASSANGE & WIKILEAKS » Split Hearings: The Assange Extradition Case Drags On

Split Hearings: The Assange Extradition Case Drags On

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

PurpleSkyz

PurpleSkyz
Admin
Split Hearings: The Assange Extradition Case Drags On
By Dr. Binoy Kampmark
Global Research, January 26, 2020

Split Hearings: The Assange Extradition Case Drags On Conspiracy-war-criminal-media-assange

It is being increasingly larded with heavy twists and turns, a form of state oppression in slow motion, but the Julian Assange extradition case now looks like it may well move into the middle of the year, dragged out, ironically enough, by the prosecution.  Curiously, this is a point that both the prosecutors, fronted by the US imperium, and the WikiLeaks defence team, seem to have found some inadvertent agreement with. This is the biggest case of its kind, and will determine, for an era, how journalism and the publication of nationally classified information is treated.  Neither wish to misstep in this regard. 
The last procedural hearing ahead of the full extradition trial of Assange over 17 counts of espionage and one of conspiracy to commit computer intrusion was trained on the issue of logistics.  The prosecutors seemed to be bellyaching in their discontent, lamenting matters of availability for their staff.  One striking example  concerned the US government’s chief barrister, James Lewis, who would be taken up with a trial in Northern Ireland of “a great deal of substance and importance”.  This would make him unavailable for up to three months after the commencement of the extradition case. 
Clair Dobbin, representing the US, was the first to make an application that the substantive hearing be split.  Various legal rulings, she argued , would have to be made subsequent to the full February proceedings, including the ticklish issue of whether certain witnesses were to remain anonymous or not.  WikiLeaks wishes that they remain so; the prosecution would like that cloak removed.
Despite already furnishing the court with a meaty affidavit, Dobbin claimed that more needed to be done in responding to the defence evidence.  (Good of them to give a sense of formality that are doing so.)  Besides all that, experts sought by the prosecution were “extremely busy practitioners and academics with very full diaries”, many still chewing over the issue of where Assange fitted in the security paradigm.  This statement of itself is odd, as is so much of the entire effort against the WikiLeaks publisher. 
Procedural dragging was also a matter of importance for the Assange team.  Despite working with manic dedication over Christmas, the issue of access remains crippling for the defence.
“We simply cannot get in as we require to see Mr Assange and to take his instruction,” argued one of Assange’s lawyers, Edward Fitzgerald.  “Frankly, we require more time before calling the main body of our evidence.” 
The point of journalism, and its legitimate pursuit in this nasty, brutish and rather long encounter, lies at the heart of the battle.  The framing of the US indictment purports to negate journalism as a factor in the case, with the prosecutors honing in on the issue of espionage and hacking.  Spies cannot be journalists, so goes the claim; espionage and publication should not be seen as comparable or even linked matters.  This very claim suggests that any form of national security journalism, the sort that exposes abuses of power, is illegal.
This round of submissions merely confirmed the point, though it is one sharpened to specifically exclude foreigners.  In other words, press protections enshrined by the First Amendment of the US Constitution cannot apply to non-US nationals, a daringly dangerous assertion.   
As WikiLeaks’ editor-in-chief Kristinn Hrafnsson crisply put it , “We have now learned from submissions and affidavits presented by the United States to the court that they do not consider foreign nationals to have a first amendment protection.” To the AAP, he surmised  that the US had also “decided that they can go after journalists wherever they are residing in the world, they have universal jurisdiction, and demand extradition like they are doing by trying to get an Australian national from the UK from publishing that took place outside US borders.” 
The US case also insists that, should the extradition be successful, Assange will be subject to that troubling euphemism of “special administrative measures”.  Even in a bureaucratic penal system, such language entails a formal and legal disappearance of the subject.
Italian journalist Stefania Maurizi suggests  with understandable gloominess that “Pandora’s box will open” if the prosecutors make their case fly in court.  The extradition of an Australian or Italian journalist by the US would just as easily justify the same action by Saudi Arabia and Russia.  This terrifying precedent is reiterated as a distinct possibility across the spectrum of commentary, an extra-territorial extension of US power to punish the world’s scribblers, bloggers and publishers. 
The outcome of this set of stuttered proceedings seemed to irritate District Judge Vanessa Baraitser, who conceded to the split, but sternly spoke of disfavour regarding any other requests for moving dates.  She did relent  to another case management hearing scheduled for February 19.  The full extradition hearing is now set to open on February 24 at London’s Woolwich Crown Court, adjourning after one week, then continuing in May 18 with a three-week hearing.  The chess pieces in this critical encounter have again been moved.
In this dark turn, a smattering of light seemed to shine through.  Having been held in withering solitary confinement in the prison medical wing of Belmarsh, news came that Assange will be moved to an area with other inmates.  Joseph Farrell of WikiLeaks described it  as “a dramatic climbdown”, “a huge victory for Assange’s legal team and for campaigners, who have been insisting for weeks that the prison authorities end the punitive treatment of Assange.”  The same could not be said about legal and medical access, both of which have been sorely lacking.
The decision to initiate the move seems to have sprung from prisoners within Belmarsh itself.  The prison governor has been petitioned on no less than three occasions by a group of convicts insisting that the treatment being afforded Assange smacked of injustice.  Human rights activist Craig Murray subsequently reflected  on this “small victory for basic humanity – and it took criminals to teach it to the British state.”   
Such victories in penal terms do tend to be mixed.  Assange will hope that those inmates he keeps company remain sympathetic to his cause.  The new quarters will house some 40 of them, and the risks to his being remain.  Even in prison, Assange’s case and plight never ceases to astonish.
*
Note to readers: please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, internet forums. etc. 
Dr. Binoy Kampmark was a Commonwealth Scholar at Selwyn College, Cambridge.  He lectures at RMIT University, Melbourne. He is a frequent contributor to Global Research and Asia-Pacific Research. Email: bkampmark@gmail.com
Killing Julian Assange: Justice Denied When Exposing Official Wrongdoing
The original source of this article is Global Research
Copyright © Dr. Binoy Kampmark , Global Research, 2020

https://counterinformation.wordpress.com/2020/01/26/split-hearings-the-assange-extradition-case-drags-on/

Thanks to: https://counterinformation.wordpress.com



  

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum