Update on the Biggest Trial Against Big Pharma in American History

“What was extraordinary to me was Pfizer’s defense. Pfizer’s defense was not that these allegations are false. They challenge whether the allegations are true but at this stage of the pleadings, they have to assume them to be true legally. Their argument was solely, even if they created a dangerous, ineffective drug that they disguised as a vaccine, that they said would be for the prevention of COVID-19, that didn’t prevent COVID at all, in fact, in some cases, it appears the infection rate, it goes up with COVID, depending on how many booster shots that you’ve had. Not only other dangers of the vaccine.
“The words ‘For the prevention of COVID-19’ are listed as a deliverable item more than a half dozen times in the contract Pfizer signed with the Defense Department.
“And yet, what did they deliver? They delivered something that was not safe. In fact, it was uniquely and extraordinarily dangerous, according to the government’s own Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System; that it was not effective – as the whole world knows – and, as Pfizer’s own CEO admitted to the European authorities, saying, ‘We didn’t really test for whether it was effective or not.’
“It didn’t prevent infection, it didn’t prevent transmission. We now know, of course, it wasn’t a vaccine, it was a gene therapy. It’s important to note, this Defense Department contract was created at a time when the word ‘vaccine’ still meant vaccine. It still meant something that inoculated and immunized against a disease.”