Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:33 pm by globalturbo
Vaccinating Newborns Is No Longer Enough – CDC Wants to Vaccinate Your Unborn Child Also
Posted by: The Liberty Beacon™ Staff
Published February 16, 2013, filed under HEALTH
Now they want to vaccinate pregnant women with potentially dangerous vaccines. Where will this lunacy end?
The old DTP vaccine caused brain damage in infants. The new DTaP
vaccine has uncertain risks—and also may not work. The government
solution is to start vaccinating even before birth.
This is part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s new recommended vaccine schedule—which includes notable changes. The CDC is recommending that pregnant women receive the DTaP vaccine during the later stages of their pregnancy, to protect the mother from diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis
(whooping cough), and then pass that immunity on to the fetus through
the placenta. The justification is that most babies become ill or die
from these diseases before they are old enough to be vaccinated, so this
will give them immunity before they’re even born.
The problem is that one of the elements of the vaccine, for whooping cough (pertussis), can be very dangerous. The whole-cell pertussis vaccine was created in 1912 and contains B. pertussis
bacteria. Its toxins (both exotoxins and endotoxins) are some of most
lethal in nature, causing tremendous inflammation throughout the body.
When a vaccine of this sort is created, the bacteria’s exotoxins are
inactivated or suppressed in the lab while other properties,
typically immunogenicity, are maintained so that the body will create
antibodies. With the pertussis vaccine, its exotoxins can cross the
blood–brain barrier under certain conditions, which can trigger brain
inflammation (encephalitis) and cause permanent brain damage. This is the version that was in the old DTwP vaccine (the w stands for whole-cell pertussis).
About twenty years ago the pertussis vaccine was reformulated into a
less reactive version with fewer side effects called the DTaP vaccine;
the a stands for acellular. The DTaP vaccine still
contains the pertussis toxin, albeit at a lower dose and in a purer
form, so the danger of brain inflammation still exists.
B. pertussis also produces endotoxins, and the immune system’s
reaction is similarly inflammatory, releasing so much histamine that it
can sometimes cause high fever, swelling, diarrhea, collapse, shock, and
death. The newer DTaP vaccine also contains these endotoxins. Then
there are the preservatives such as aluminum. Are we really crazy enough
to want to expose unborns to this?
DTaP recommendations have also been expanded to include routine
vaccination of adults aged 65 and older despite the aluminum, which has
been linked to Alzheimer’s disease.
Ironically, even mainstream medicine is beginning to question whether the pertussis vaccine is all that effective in first place.
There’s a worldwide epidemic of whooping cough going on, and the
vaccine doesn’t seem to be doing much to prevent the disease. Immunity
seems to be weak and to wear off rather quickly—in as little as three years. Is it even worth the risk? As our colleagues at ANH-Europe point out:
Much of the effectiveness of the whooping cough (pertussis) vaccine
is a statistical mirage; it’s hardly surprising that the current US
outbreak is occurring against a background of record vaccination
rates. Washington, for example, one of the states worst affected by the
current outbreak, recorded that 92.9% of children aged 18–36 months
received 3 or more doses of the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis (DTaP)
vaccine in 2010–11.
The CDC’s new vaccine schedule also removes previous precautions
about pregnant women being given the hepatitis A vaccine—despite the
fact that its safety for pregnant women has not been determined.
Moreover, hepatitis A has a mortality rate of less than 1%, and almost
everyone who gets it recovers without treatment. So why is a vaccine
necessary? Some hepatitis A vaccines contain aluminum as an adjuvant.
Why recommend pregnant women expose themselves to the vaccine’s risks
with so little benefit?
Several states have introduced vaccine legislation that we’re keeping
an eye on. Because the number of bills is large, we won’t include all
the alerts here. Instead we’ll shortly send out individual alerts to
readers in each affected state.
Read original here: http://www.anh-usa.org/vaccinating-newborns-is-no-longer-enough/
digg
4 Responses
More like this:
NextPrevious
4 Responses. Have your say.
G. Giodano says:
February 17, 2013 at 1:39 pm
Seems to me that if 92% of subjects vaccinated for anything wind up
with the very thing they are vaccinated against, then they are not,in
fact, vaccinated, but purposely infected.
I’m pretty sure that no sample group of anyone anywhere has a 92% rate of contracting anything without help.
That being said… I find it almost impossible to believe that one can
conclud anything other than a combined clandestine effort by the ruling
governments and the pharmaceutical companies to poison the population to
whatever the end.
Reply
Bob says:
February 17, 2013 at 7:26 pm
G Giodano, It’s not saying that 92.9% of the vaccinated children
came down with whooping cough. It’s saying, of all the children who
contracted whooping cough, 92.9% had been vaccinated. But, still, I
agree with your conclusion that continuing to administer vaccines when
the harm is so obvious and wide-spread, it makes one wonder if it’s not
just about money but also some other agenda such as mass-sterilization
and depopulation.
Reply
Thanks to: http://www.thelibertybeacon.com
Posted by: The Liberty Beacon™ Staff
Published February 16, 2013, filed under HEALTH
Now they want to vaccinate pregnant women with potentially dangerous vaccines. Where will this lunacy end?The old DTP vaccine caused brain damage in infants. The new DTaP
vaccine has uncertain risks—and also may not work. The government
solution is to start vaccinating even before birth.
This is part of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s new recommended vaccine schedule—which includes notable changes. The CDC is recommending that pregnant women receive the DTaP vaccine during the later stages of their pregnancy, to protect the mother from diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis
(whooping cough), and then pass that immunity on to the fetus through
the placenta. The justification is that most babies become ill or die
from these diseases before they are old enough to be vaccinated, so this
will give them immunity before they’re even born.
The problem is that one of the elements of the vaccine, for whooping cough (pertussis), can be very dangerous. The whole-cell pertussis vaccine was created in 1912 and contains B. pertussis
bacteria. Its toxins (both exotoxins and endotoxins) are some of most
lethal in nature, causing tremendous inflammation throughout the body.
When a vaccine of this sort is created, the bacteria’s exotoxins are
inactivated or suppressed in the lab while other properties,
typically immunogenicity, are maintained so that the body will create
antibodies. With the pertussis vaccine, its exotoxins can cross the
blood–brain barrier under certain conditions, which can trigger brain
inflammation (encephalitis) and cause permanent brain damage. This is the version that was in the old DTwP vaccine (the w stands for whole-cell pertussis).
About twenty years ago the pertussis vaccine was reformulated into a
less reactive version with fewer side effects called the DTaP vaccine;
the a stands for acellular. The DTaP vaccine still
contains the pertussis toxin, albeit at a lower dose and in a purer
form, so the danger of brain inflammation still exists.
B. pertussis also produces endotoxins, and the immune system’s
reaction is similarly inflammatory, releasing so much histamine that it
can sometimes cause high fever, swelling, diarrhea, collapse, shock, and
death. The newer DTaP vaccine also contains these endotoxins. Then
there are the preservatives such as aluminum. Are we really crazy enough
to want to expose unborns to this?
DTaP recommendations have also been expanded to include routine
vaccination of adults aged 65 and older despite the aluminum, which has
been linked to Alzheimer’s disease.
Ironically, even mainstream medicine is beginning to question whether the pertussis vaccine is all that effective in first place.
There’s a worldwide epidemic of whooping cough going on, and the
vaccine doesn’t seem to be doing much to prevent the disease. Immunity
seems to be weak and to wear off rather quickly—in as little as three years. Is it even worth the risk? As our colleagues at ANH-Europe point out:
Much of the effectiveness of the whooping cough (pertussis) vaccine
is a statistical mirage; it’s hardly surprising that the current US
outbreak is occurring against a background of record vaccination
rates. Washington, for example, one of the states worst affected by the
current outbreak, recorded that 92.9% of children aged 18–36 months
received 3 or more doses of the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis (DTaP)
vaccine in 2010–11.
The CDC’s new vaccine schedule also removes previous precautions
about pregnant women being given the hepatitis A vaccine—despite the
fact that its safety for pregnant women has not been determined.
Moreover, hepatitis A has a mortality rate of less than 1%, and almost
everyone who gets it recovers without treatment. So why is a vaccine
necessary? Some hepatitis A vaccines contain aluminum as an adjuvant.
Why recommend pregnant women expose themselves to the vaccine’s risks
with so little benefit?
Several states have introduced vaccine legislation that we’re keeping
an eye on. Because the number of bills is large, we won’t include all
the alerts here. Instead we’ll shortly send out individual alerts to
readers in each affected state.
Read original here: http://www.anh-usa.org/vaccinating-newborns-is-no-longer-enough/
digg
4 Responses
More like this:
How Corporations Engineered the Non-Regulation of Dangerous Genetically Modified Foods
The Evil of Monsanto and GMOs Explained: Bad Technology, Endless Greed and the Destruction of Humanity
What the Vaccine Industry Won’t Admit About the Dangers of Vaccination
NextPrevious
4 Responses. Have your say.
Real American says:
February 16, 2013 at 8:56 pm
How can you do this to “non-living, non=human lumps of tissue” (as seen by pro-abortion people)?
Reply
japoa says:
February 17, 2013 at 4:57 am
To expand on your point . Why is it that when a pregnant woman gets
into a fatal car accident , the other driver is charged with 2 counts
of vehicular homicide instead of one ?After all , in their mind-frame
there was only one person in the car ! Can’t have it both ways .
Reply
G. Giodano says: February 17, 2013 at 1:39 pm
Seems to me that if 92% of subjects vaccinated for anything wind up
with the very thing they are vaccinated against, then they are not,in
fact, vaccinated, but purposely infected.
I’m pretty sure that no sample group of anyone anywhere has a 92% rate of contracting anything without help.
That being said… I find it almost impossible to believe that one can
conclud anything other than a combined clandestine effort by the ruling
governments and the pharmaceutical companies to poison the population to
whatever the end.
Reply
Bob says: February 17, 2013 at 7:26 pm
G Giodano, It’s not saying that 92.9% of the vaccinated children
came down with whooping cough. It’s saying, of all the children who
contracted whooping cough, 92.9% had been vaccinated. But, still, I
agree with your conclusion that continuing to administer vaccines when
the harm is so obvious and wide-spread, it makes one wonder if it’s not
just about money but also some other agenda such as mass-sterilization
and depopulation.
Reply
-
-
- Subscribe via Email
Enter your email address to subscribe to this site and receive notifications of new posts by email.
Your generous donation helps to support the efforts of The Liberty Beacon™ online. Thank you.
- TLB Recommended Links
US Debt Clock
2nd Amendment Preservation Act
Thanks to: http://www.thelibertybeacon.com
