OUT OF MIND
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Latest topics
» Is it possible to apply positive + in favor Newton III Motion Law as a dynamic system in a motor engine
ROUND SIX : Karen Hudes v. Judge Anna plus MORE for 1/19/2016 EmptySat Mar 23, 2024 11:33 pm by globalturbo

» Meta 1 Coin Scam Update - Robert Dunlop Arrested
ROUND SIX : Karen Hudes v. Judge Anna plus MORE for 1/19/2016 EmptySat Mar 23, 2024 12:14 am by RamblerNash

» As We Navigate Debs Passing
ROUND SIX : Karen Hudes v. Judge Anna plus MORE for 1/19/2016 EmptyMon Jan 08, 2024 6:18 pm by Ponee

» 10/7 — Much More Dangerous & Diabolical Than Anyone Knows
ROUND SIX : Karen Hudes v. Judge Anna plus MORE for 1/19/2016 EmptyThu Nov 02, 2023 8:30 pm by KennyL

» Sundays and Deb.....
ROUND SIX : Karen Hudes v. Judge Anna plus MORE for 1/19/2016 EmptySun Oct 01, 2023 9:11 pm by NanneeRose

» African Official Exposes Bill Gates’ Depopulation Agenda: ‘My Country Is Not Your Laboratory’
ROUND SIX : Karen Hudes v. Judge Anna plus MORE for 1/19/2016 EmptyThu Sep 21, 2023 4:39 am by NanneeRose

» DEBS HEALTH
ROUND SIX : Karen Hudes v. Judge Anna plus MORE for 1/19/2016 EmptySun Sep 03, 2023 10:23 am by ANENRO

» Attorney Reveals the “Exculpatory” Evidence Jack Smith Possesses that Exonerates President Trump
ROUND SIX : Karen Hudes v. Judge Anna plus MORE for 1/19/2016 EmptyTue Aug 29, 2023 10:48 am by ANENRO

» Update From Site Owner to Members & Guests
ROUND SIX : Karen Hudes v. Judge Anna plus MORE for 1/19/2016 EmptyTue Aug 29, 2023 10:47 am by ANENRO

» New global internet censorship began today
ROUND SIX : Karen Hudes v. Judge Anna plus MORE for 1/19/2016 EmptyMon Aug 21, 2023 9:25 am by NanneeRose

» Alienated from reality
ROUND SIX : Karen Hudes v. Judge Anna plus MORE for 1/19/2016 EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 4:29 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Why does Russia now believe that Covid-19 was a US-created bioweapon?
ROUND SIX : Karen Hudes v. Judge Anna plus MORE for 1/19/2016 EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 4:27 pm by PurpleSkyz

»  Man reports history of interaction with seemingly intelligent orbs
ROUND SIX : Karen Hudes v. Judge Anna plus MORE for 1/19/2016 EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:34 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Western reactions to the controversial Benin Bronzes
ROUND SIX : Karen Hudes v. Judge Anna plus MORE for 1/19/2016 EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:29 pm by PurpleSkyz

» India unveils first images from Moon mission
ROUND SIX : Karen Hudes v. Judge Anna plus MORE for 1/19/2016 EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:27 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Scientists achieve nuclear fusion net energy gain for second time
ROUND SIX : Karen Hudes v. Judge Anna plus MORE for 1/19/2016 EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:25 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Putin Signals 5G Ban
ROUND SIX : Karen Hudes v. Judge Anna plus MORE for 1/19/2016 EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:07 pm by PurpleSkyz

» “Texas Student Dies in Car Accident — Discovers Life after Death”
ROUND SIX : Karen Hudes v. Judge Anna plus MORE for 1/19/2016 EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:05 pm by PurpleSkyz

» The hidden history taught by secret societies
ROUND SIX : Karen Hudes v. Judge Anna plus MORE for 1/19/2016 EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:03 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Vaccines and SIDS (Crib Death)
ROUND SIX : Karen Hudes v. Judge Anna plus MORE for 1/19/2016 EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:00 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Sun blasts out highest-energy radiation ever recorded, raising questions for solar physics
ROUND SIX : Karen Hudes v. Judge Anna plus MORE for 1/19/2016 EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 2:29 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Why you should be eating more porcini mushrooms
ROUND SIX : Karen Hudes v. Judge Anna plus MORE for 1/19/2016 EmptySun Aug 06, 2023 10:38 am by PurpleSkyz


You are not connected. Please login or register

ROUND SIX : Karen Hudes v. Judge Anna plus MORE for 1/19/2016

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

PurpleSkyz

PurpleSkyz
Admin

ROUND SIX : Karen Hudes v. Judge Anna


ROUND SIX : Karen Hudes v. Judge Anna plus MORE for 1/19/2016 Uscivilflagpicture221x150

Below you will find the text of a message Ms. Hudes put out on Twitter and which was forwarded to me by others this morning.  No actual hard copy correspondence has been received. 
Anna Von Reitz
   ________________________________________

KAREN wrote:
General Joseph Dunford, Jr. is not getting the gold you wanted the Global Debt Facility to give him. Instead, General Dunford, Jr. and any secret successors if such there be are all relieved of their command under martial law. The secret martial law in the United States is illegitimate. You want to perpetuate martial law? You have no authority to perpetuate martial law because the governed have withdrawn their consent and there is no legitimacy. Your attempt to reinstate General Dunford, Jr. as commander of the US government under martial law has failed. The United States is in interregnum. The indebtedness of all the countries of the world is now ended as a scam. The Network of Global Corporate Control identified by Vitali, Glattfelder, and Battiston of ETH Zurich http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1107/1107.5728v2.pdf owes more to the Global Debt Facility than all country debts. https://s3.amazonaws.com/khudes/treaty+of+versailles+offer+of+sale+2+quadrillion1.pdf


ANNA:
Your Banker Bosses have purchased the insolvent corporation belonging to the IMF doing business as the UNITED STATES, INC.  so you think you can do what you please, however, ownership of a bankrupt corporation does not put you or your bosses in charge of this country or its people and does not give you the right to say “Boo!” to General Dunford.
That is a responsibility and a role retained by the people who are the actual government, not a corporation representing the government.   

Just  like a United States Silver Dollar is actual fact and a Federal Reserve Note is  “a promise to pay at a future time”----unless, of course the bank backing this private script goes bankrupt--- a fact always overcomes hot wind.

The actual government overcomes a corporation claiming to “represent” that government, especially when that corporation has no actual contract with us and is merely claiming to be a Successor to contract via the purchase of the prior pretender/provider.

We, the people, are the government of the United States, not any corporation merely under contract to provide us with “governmental services”.   

If and when a “federal” corporation fails, as the IMF version has, it is our choice of what corporation may act as Successor and we are not under any obligation to choose yours. 

Whatever presumptions you and your Bosses may have had and may have made “in our behalf” have been solidly rebutted and rebuffed before the United Nations Secretary General and the United Nations Security Council.

We retain the right to choose with whom we do business and your “assumption” of contract in no way a contract makes in the open face of our repudiation and rebuttal. 

If you wish to provide governmental services for free without any claim of contract and without any use of franchises or indebtedness or enforcement of any debt against the free sovereign and independent people of the United States and/or our organic states of the Union and/or our united States of America which is an unincorporated company---with no strings at all attached and merely as a free and honest public service to all--then hop to it, Ms. Hudes. That's what should have been going on this entire time.  

But don't presume any capacity to act as our usufruct or employ any copyright upon our given names or presume that any vessel in commerce named after us can be used to claim any debt or enforce any private law whatsoever.  Don't presume upon any title held under Color of Law to land or  natural resources on public or private property situated in the organic states.  Don't presume that the receipt of any such service results in any obligation.  

You purchased the “UNITED STATES, INC.” and you are now trying to use our assets to back the “United States Treasury Notes” that go with it.   This is merely more self-interest and presumption on the part of commercial entities that have no contract with us and no power to speak for us in this matter.

KAREN:
You cannot prevent this from taking effect. It is not being done with your assets, but with Treaty of Versailles Bonds. This is a no-brainer. Country debts are no more.

ANNA:
Of course, we can’t prevent the acquisition of one corporation by another corporation.   We aren’t trying to.  What we can prevent is the acquisition of any presumed contract with us and our actual organic states of the Union and our unincorporated trading companies doing business as the States of America.   We have objected to any such presumption of contract by you and your employers and have repudiated the existence of all public transmitting utilities created by the UNITED STATES, INC. which have been created and named in a non-specific fashion after living Americans—that is, names in the form: JOHN Q. ADAMS ---for the purpose of organized crime.  
  
KAREN:
The Board of Governors of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund were not involved in the Bankruptcy of the United States and you are wrong to accuse the Board of Governors of the World Bank and IMF of being secondary creditors under Title 5 of the old Federal Code, and the Bankruptcy Act of 1934. You are mixing up the illegal acts of the Network of Global Corporate Control long before the Board of Governors of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund and their Boards of Executive Directors came on the scene.

ANNA:
The World Bank now is the same institution functioning under the same basic charter as it did in 1933 and whether the names operating it have changed or not or even the ownership has changed,  it is flying the same flag as a vessel in commerce.  It has continued to do business and has remained subject to international law the entire time.   I haven’t mixed up anything about it.  I’ve merely given Notice to the current regime that the sins of the past are known and not to be so easily swept under any rugs in the present.

KAREN:
The Board of Governors have never agreed to stand in for the United States as Trustees or Secondary Creditors in Bankruptcy; Title 5 and the Bankruptcy Act was subterfuge by the Network of Global Corporate Control.

ANNA:   
The World Bank dba International Monetary Fund and IBRD were Secondary Creditors in the Bankruptcy of the United States of America, Inc. and are playing a different role in the present insolvency of the United States, Inc.  So what?  

What we brought to your attention as a Trustee of the Global Debt Facility in receipt of these assets stands.  The World Bank in the present time was in receipt of property assets purloined from our grandparents and is as such in possession of stolen goods, and whether or not the Board of Governor’s “donated” these purloined assets to the “Global Debt Facility” ---those assets are ours.  This is merely more chicanery and avoidance of facts that are easily disproven by audit. 

This circumstance resulted from a false and unconscionable claim that these assets were “abandoned” by the Heirs and Entitlement Holders.  We are the Heirs and Entitlement Holders and we are here to collect.

It is that simple, Ms. Hudes.  

KAREN:
The World Court and the UN have no jurisdiction over the assets in the Global Debt Facility, which are being deployed in a Global Currency Reset directly to all humankind in the form of national currencies out of gold and clean-up of Fukushima.

ANNA:  
The World Court and the UN and the rest of us will have plenty to say about criminal acts undertaken by any incorporated entity, including the World Bank, the IBRD, and the International Monetary Fund holding charters in any of our countries.   As a mere spin-off by these banks--- the equivalent of a bank deposit box for dirty assets---the “Global Debt Facility” is in an even more precarious position, Ms. Hudes.   And so are you.

You have been notified as a Trustee that the assets you are distributing from the “Global Debt Facility” have been stolen.  Moreover, you have been notified of this in the name of actual Donors and Heirs and Entitlement Holders.

KAREN:
You have failed to address the point that the gold in the Global Debt Facility came from the rest of the world and not from the United States.

ANNA:
Correction, Karen.  A sizeable portion, if not all, of the gold and other assets in the “Global Debt Facility” came from the united States of America.  You like to drop off those other two little words “of America” and you like to play word games and obscure which “united states” you are talking about, but I am not deceived and neither are millions of other people nowadays. 

Your horde, for example, includes the gold that was confiscated from our grandparents by the Roosevelt Administration and though you have had almost two weeks to prove otherwise and demonstrate that the World Bank/IBRD did NOT collect our inheritance as “abandoned funds” --- you have failed to present a clean audit demonstrating otherwise. 

KAREN:
The theft that occurred went in the other direction. It was the gold owned by the Global Debt Facility that went missing from the vaults in the twin towers before September 11, 2001.

ANNA:
What went “missing” from the vaults in the Twin Towers wasn’t gold, Karen.  If it had been gold, it would still be there in microcrystalline form, but it is not.  This suggests that agents of the UNITED STATES, INC. removed any gold that was there prior to the attack---just like they set up Hollywood film crews the night before to film the death and destruction.

What did go missing were records proving the provenance of that gold and the true ownership of massive amounts of land and other assets belonging to us—a major part of which has shown up in the hands of the World Bank and IBRD and IMF.  Go figure.   Also go figure that we have plenty of other records. 

This crime has been contemplated by the banks for the better part of a hundred years and it has taken place with a combination of knowing and unknowing cooperation by branches of the governmental services corporations these same banks have funded and operated on our shores.

You and your bosses – all those depositing hot goods in the “Global Debt Facility”  are under demand to return the assets to the lawful Heirs and Entitlement Holders and being prohibited from disposing of assets belonging to us under any false pretense or excuse whatsoever.

KAREN:
Your only remaining point is that I am a member of the BAR, ignoring entirely how I have documented precisely the corruption in the legal profession in all its gory details, with no holds barred (pun intended).

ANNA: 
And you are missing your own attempts to mischaracterize me as an “agent of Vatican” when in fact I have never worked for or with the Vatican at all and also your acts disparaging the Knights of Malta for no known cause, while working yourself as a member of one of the largest, most powerful and therefore most-responsible-for-this-mess Secret Societies on the face of the Earth. 

Talk about the pot calling the kettle black, Karen?

The true crime committed against me and all other living people by the Bar Associations has been the practice of incorporating and copyrighting the names of living people so as to press gang them into the foreign international jurisdiction of the sea and once there, the use of personage and barratry as a means to defraud them of their identity and property assets on land.

These acts are profoundly criminal.  Both press- ganging and inland piracy have been outlawed for 200 years.  Enslavement by any means has been outlawed worldwide since 1926.

The Bar Associations are responsible for purposeful and knowing acts promoting identity theft, mischaracterization, fraudulent changes of political status, malfeasance, constructive fraud, reverse trust fraud, unlawful conversion of assets including whole estates, personage and barratry for a hundred and fifty years. 

There is no way to calculate the amount of property stolen, the lives ruined, or the lives lost as a result of the activities of members of the Bar, but it is absolutely certain that you are part of the nest of vipers and cannot afford to throw any stones at anyone for anything. 

KAREN:
You are bringing false claims and attributing criminal activities to the Board of Governors of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund at a time when the Network of Global Corporate Control is trying to plunge the world into darkness. For this I ask the long-forbearing, good people of the earth to forgive you. I cannot.

ANNA:
Karen, the banks and the lawyers are the ones responsible for this mess, along with politicians who have occupied vacant public offices and deceitfully used them for private gain.  The good people of the Earth have suffered as a result and none of them that I know have any difficulty identifying the Banks and Bar Associations and Politicians as the cause. 
The Holy See has taken its share of the blame and moved to bring remedy.

Perhaps in your own twisted minds the Banks and Bar Associations are attempting to do the same by offering our money and assets to pay for your debts?  Giving away our money and assets to whomever to placate the world for the wrongs you have all created and perpetuated?

Does that make sense?

The good people of the Earth--at least the one standing here-- says, no, it does not.

What makes sense is for the Banks and the Bar Associations to use their own assets to pay their own debts and for you to return our assets to us free and clear from liens and encumbrances resulting from the criminal mis-administration of these same Banks while doing business as “The United States of America, Inc.” and “the United States of America, Inc.” and as the “UNITED STATES, INC.” also.

Sincerely, 
 Karen Hudes Acting General Counsel International Bank for Reconstruction and Development Overseer Mandate Trustee TVM-LSM-666



ANNA: 
Just two other points.  There are no Bogey Men in the world, Karen. There are simply evil men consumed by senseless greed and self-interest. Many of them are bankers.  Others are lawyers.  And still more are politicians.  For the past year or more you have been casting around trying to find something or someone to blame this circumstance upon and now it’s the “Network of Global Control”—your latest offering.  

Karen---you are part of that Network of Global Control, and are in fact part of the glue that holds it together and makes it work.  Without lawyers and judges in admiralty to put on an appearance of justice these wrongs would be self-evident and without bankers to buy off the politicians, it would fall apart, too, and be revealed as nothing but a Carnival Illusion made of paper and wind.

Without you and people like you, we wouldn’t be living in a world of “Haves” and “Have Nots” --- a world of scarcity, duplicity, dishonesty, greed, self-service, and illusory “legal fictions” that exist only to promote crime and escape accountability for it.

Any forgiveness that needs to be extended is being extended already to you and to all the other lawyers and bankers and politicians responsible for these criminal acts against me and millions of other victims, but that offer of general amnesty to cover your sins is running out.
And our lien questions have still not been answered. 


---------------------------------------

[size=13]See this article and over 100 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com[/size]
Posted by Paul Stramer at 7:48 PM ROUND SIX : Karen Hudes v. Judge Anna plus MORE for 1/19/2016 Icon18_email


Thanks to: http://www.paulstramer.net

PurpleSkyz

PurpleSkyz
Admin

Why All Contracts Are Void and Fraud By Nature -- Language and Parse Syntax


ROUND SIX : Karen Hudes v. Judge Anna plus MORE for 1/19/2016 Anna210
by Anna Von Reitz

In recent days I have had cause to consider the Truth very deeply.  One of the Truths of our lives is that none of us are in control of anything.  As the Prophet Jeremiah observed, we cannot and do not control a single step.  We can't guarantee anything as a result--- we can't guarantee that we will perform any contract, do any deed, or even be alive in the morning. 

This is the Truth, but we promptly endeavor to forget it, and go our sinful silly way, pretending to make contracts right and left.     

As a result of our mortality and other natural limitations, we don't have the ability to contract, and absolutely everything that we do that pretends to create a contract is a fraud.  

Not only that, but at some level of our consciousness, it is a known lie.  

At best, we can make a good faith statement of our intentions or we can make a record of our actual actions.  That's it. 

As for promises to perform in the future-- there are and can be no guarantees. And that means that there can be no lawful enforcement. 

This is as true for corporations, which are merely legal fiction constructs, as it is for the living people who create corporations. Like people, corporations can die, go under new management, be bankrupted, or otherwise prevented or sidetracked from repaying debts or performing services. 

So, then, neither we nor any corporation we can create is competent to make a contract and neither we nor any corporation are owed enforcement of any act conceived in fraud. 

That's the Truth, too. 

Now I can guarantee you that I am not the first one in history to realize this and that this realization has caused no end of consternation for ages past.  

It has in fact been the driving force behind the creation of "the World"--- a wholly fictitious system of lies and "legal" constructs and people devoted to serving lies and legal fictions, a Make Believe domain where all the Liars gather and trade lies among themselves and waste no time in collecting new recruits and defrauding the rest of us. 

 And who are these Masters of Deceit, these "Liars" who serve the Father of All Lies?
 

If the Church had admitted the Truth of our mortality and our limitations, there would have been no opportunity for the lawyers and bankers and politicians to weave their web and no means for the perpetrators to profit from legal fictions, legal tender, or legal contracts, either.   

It would have been obvious to all Mankind for generations that we have no ability to contract and that no Higher Contracting Powers exist among us.   Zero ability to contract plus zero ability to contract plus zero ability to contract......(ad infinitum)..... means that a "Queen" or a "King" pretending to represent all of us has what?  Zero ability to contract. 

No man, no woman, no corporation, no headman nor representative has any ability to contract, either.  We cannot multiply an inability and somehow magically wind up with an ability that none of us possess.  

All contracts are lies conceived in known fraud and they are owed no enforcement whatsoever. 

Nobody from the Queen of England down to the proprietor of Joe's Pawn Shop has any cause to complain on the basis of any contract and any such complaint must be considered void. The complaining party had to know that the other party had no ability to guarantee performance to start with. 

Beyond that, how can we know for sure what either Party to a contract knew or didn't know or what they intended or thought about it? What did they intend by their words?  Which "United States" were they each talking about?  

The only Witnesses having any first hand knowledge of their intentions, beliefs, or understanding of any contract at the moment they signed it are the actual Parties to it, and they are either known Liars or incompetents.  Otherwise, they wouldn't be making a contract in the first place, would they?   

Between these two smashing rocks---- inability to guarantee performance and no means to determine the actual knowledge and intent of the parties-- the entire concept of a "valid contract" lies dead and bleeding.  

There is no such thing as a valid contract created by Mankind and never was.  What we are left with are millions upon millions of invalid contracts and millions upon millions of lawyers, bankers, and politicians feeding on these lies like vultures on carrion. 

Earlier I had dubbed the scandalous actions of the Franklin Delano Roosevelt Administration as The Great Fraud, but I must reconsider that in light of this much, much more profound fraud which has been perpetuated since time out of mind--- the entire idea of people or their corporations being able to make, judge, or demand enforcement of contracts. 

Urgent Press Release:  Billions of pages of so-called contract law and billions of false, unenforcable claims and most of the Harvard Law Library just flew out the window. 

Some years ago a dear friend of mine died.  He was a lonely man except for his girlfriend and a few friends.  He lived alone on a Master-Sergeant's retirement check and died of a rare cancer known to be caused by Agent Orange, which he helped transport in Vietnam.  There was no help from the VA, just a prompt cancellation of his retirement check. 

After his death, his mail---along with a final telephone bill-- was forwarded to his girlfriend. She had no money to pay it, but the bill kept coming and with it, increasingly ugly calls from the phone company and bill collectors acting for the phone company.  This went on for the better part of two years despite the fact that she told them, "Mr. Rowe is dead." and sent them a copy of the Death Certificate--- they kept right on. 

Finally, she set up an appointment with the CEO of the telephone company.  That afternoon she appeared in a nice dress with an urn that she carried in and placed on the CEO's desk.  

"I'm here to discuss payment of this bill," she told him, dropping a copy in front of him.  "I keep telling him---" nodding to the urn--- "that he ought to pay it, but he won't do a thing about it. Maybe you can talk some sense into him?"  Then she plunked down the Death Certificate and started to cry. 

This takes the basic situation and illustrates it to the point of the ridiculous.  

It has been suggested that the problem with contracts is the language and the grammar used and that we can overcome the difficulty by reducing language to its most basic mathematical content and adhering to rigid mathematical rules of grammar construction to do away with "adverb-verb" language and thus avoid endless arguments over what "quickly" or "dutifully" means. 

This Parse-Syntax Grammar has been widely accepted in theory and I admit that there is a mathematical interface inherent in language that results naturally from the parts of language we employ and string together to communicate, but it isn't any answer to the basic problem which is the fraudulent nature of all contracts and our inability to disclose them adequately even if we could guarantee their enforcement---which owing to "time and unforeseen circumstance" in King Solomon's words---we can't.  

Instead, what I see is an 8,000 year-old history of pretending that contracts are valid and giving their interpretation and enforcement over to an elite group of priests or scholars who always use an unintelligible special language to bamboozle and manipulate and hide their fraud from the general populace.  

Most recently this has been demonstrated by the American Bar Association in concert with the International Bar Association using "Legalese" and special "legal terms" and special "definitions" often buried in reams and reams of unintelligible gobbledygook like the Internal Revenue Manual. 

That the resulting abuses are purposeful and intentional is adequately proven by the great care with which the various traps have been laid and misrepresented, such as the action of the Congress in 1862 to arbitrarily redefine the meaning of the single word "person" to mean "corporation" and their similar action in 1864 to redefine the words "state, State, and United States" to mean "District of Columbia Municipal Corporation".  

The problem isn't the language.  The problem is the basic dishonesty and greed and nastiness of the men misusing language, and the same would be true of any mathematical language, too. Whether we use letters or numbers or any other symbols, all languages are vulnerable to the same sorts of manipulation and changes and interpretations. 

We can't change "the World" until we recognize the Truth and change ourselves. 

The actual problem with contracts lies in the fact of our mortality and our inability to guarantee performance due to many factors that change our circumstance and expectations and abilities day to day. Consider the insanity of signing a piece of paper saying what you are going to do for the next thirty years when you can guarantee what you will do for the next thirty minutes? 

The further problem is in our inability to fully express and document what we know, what we intend, what we mean, and what we believe at any given moment in the form of words or symbols of any kind.  Just try telling someone how much you love them and why.  

We aim at meaning and sometimes we come close.  We can't make contracts, can't reasonably enforce contracts on each other, we are being bamboozled by all those who claim otherwise and we are also are being senselessly subjected to cruel and unreasoning punishment by bill collectors, revenue agents, and commercial mercenaries profiting from this racketeering, falsehood, and criminality---- which is being protected by bankers, lawyers, politicians, and even some members of the clergy. 

To make it all that much worse, that much more inexcusable, we have seen these same evils many times before.  Press-ganging was outlawed 200 years ago for a reason.  Debtors prisons were outlawed in England in the 19th century for a reason.  Enslavement and peonage have been outlawed worldwide since 1926 for a reason. 

Take those reasons to heart and champion them with thought, word, and deed.  Make it your mission in life to speak and uphold the Truth.  Never tolerate lies and self-interest when you have means and breath to oppose it, never accept racketeering and bullying under Color of Law, never give your consent to injustice, criminality, or falsehood of any kind.  Strive always to see clearly, act rightly, feel deeply, and use your common sense as these are your safeguards in a "world" in which bankers make idols out of nothing and sell men's souls and labor in "equitable exchange" for paper, in which professional Liars pretend to dispense Justice, and venal politicians convince you that they represent you and your country. 

Judge Anna Maria Riezinger

Alaska State Superior Court

---------------------------------------
[size=13]See this article and over 100 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com[/size]
Posted by Paul Stramer at 10:38 PM


Thanks to: http://www.paulstramer.net

PurpleSkyz

PurpleSkyz
Admin

Anna von Reitz: How very funny…you are.

Posted on January 19, 2016 by arnierosner
In September… As a result of some of your writings…I concluded everything we have been told has been lies.

Yes..I admit to being the biggest fool…

And now you conclude we were never capable of ever telling the truth from the beginning
The Epiphany –
On Jan 18, 2016, at 7:09 PM, Anna von Reitz wrote:
In recent days I have had cause to consider the Truth very deeply. One of the Truths of our lives is that none of us are in control of anything. As the Prophet Jeremiah observed, we cannot and do not control a single step. We can’t guarantee anything as a result— we can’t guarantee that we will perform any contract, do any deed, or even be alive in the morning.
This is the Truth, but we promptly endeavor to forget it, and go our sinful silly way, pretending to make contracts right and left.   
As a result of our mortality and other natural limitations, we don’t have the ability to contract, and absolutely everything that we do that pretends to create a contract is a fraud.
Not only that, but at some level of our consciousness, it is a known lie.
At best, we can make a good faith statement of our intentions or we can make a record of our actual actions. That’s it.
As for promises to perform in the future– there are and can be no guarantees. And that means that there can be no lawful enforcement.
This is as true for corporations, which are merely legal fiction constructs, as it is for the living people who create corporations. Like people, corporations can die, go under new management, be bankrupted, or otherwise prevented or sidetracked from repaying debts or performing services.
So, then, neither we nor any corporation we can create is competent to make a contract and neither we nor any corporation are owed enforcement of any act conceived in fraud.
That’s the Truth, too.
Now I can guarantee you that I am not the first one in history to realize this and that this realization has caused no end of consternation for ages past.
It has in fact been the driving force behind the creation of “the World”— a wholly fictitious system of lies and “legal” constructs and people devoted to serving lies and legal fictions, a Make Believe domain where all the Liars gather and trade lies among themselves and waste no time in collecting new recruits and defrauding the rest of us.
And who are these Masters of Deceit, these “Liars” who serve the Father of All Lies?
If the Church had admitted the Truth of our mortality and our limitations, there would have been no opportunity for the lawyers and bankers and politicians to weave their web and no means for the perpetrators to profit from legal fictions, legal tender, or legal contracts, either.   
It would have been obvious to all Mankind for generations that we have no ability to contract and that no Higher Contracting Powers exist among us. Zero ability to contract plus zero ability to contract plus zero ability to contract……(ad infinitum)….. means that a “Queen” or a “King” pretending to represent all of us has what? Zero ability to contract.
No man, no woman, no corporation, no headman nor representative has any ability to contract, either. We cannot multiply an inability and somehow magically wind up with an ability that none of us possess.
All contracts are lies conceived in known fraud and they are owed no enforcement whatsoever.
Nobody from the Queen of England down to the proprietor of Joe’s Pawn Shop has any cause to complain on the basis of any contract and any such complaint must be considered void. The complaining party had to know that the other party had no ability to guarantee performance to start with.
Beyond that, how can we know for sure what either Party to a contract knew or didn’t know or what they intended or thought about it? What did they intend by their words? Which “United States” were they each talking about?
The only Witnesses having any first hand knowledge of their intentions, beliefs, or understanding of any contract at the moment they signed it are the actual Parties to it, and they are either known Liars or incompetents. Otherwise, they wouldn’t be making a contract in the first place, would they?   
Between these two smashing rocks—- inability to guarantee performance and no means to determine the actual knowledge and intent of the parties– the entire concept of a “valid contract” lies dead and bleeding.
There is no such thing as a valid contract created by Mankind and never was. What we are left with are millions upon millions of invalid contracts and millions upon millions of lawyers, bankers, and politicians feeding on these lies like vultures on carrion.
Earlier I had dubbed the scandalous actions of the Franklin Delano Roosevelt Administration as The Great Fraud, but I must reconsider that in light of this much, much more profound fraud which has been perpetuated since time out of mind— the entire idea of people or their corporations being able to make, judge, or demand enforcement of contracts.
Urgent Press Release: Billions of pages of so-called contract law and billions of false, unenforcable claims and most of the Harvard Law Library just flew out the window.
Some years ago a dear friend of mine died. He was a lonely man except for his girlfriend and a few friends. He lived alone on a Master-Sergeant’s retirement check and died of a rare cancer known to be caused by Agent Orange, which he helped transport in Vietnam. There was no help from the VA, just a prompt cancellation of his retirement check.
After his death, his mail—along with a final telephone bill– was forwarded to his girlfriend. She had no money to pay it, but the bill kept coming and with it, increasingly ugly calls from the phone company and bill collectors acting for the phone company. This went on for the better part of two years despite the fact that she told them, “Mr. Rowe is dead.” and sent them a copy of the Death Certificate— they kept right on.
Finally, she set up an appointment with the CEO of the telephone company. That afternoon she appeared in a nice dress with an urn that she carried in and placed on the CEO’s desk.
“I’m here to discuss payment of this bill,” she told him, dropping a copy in front of him. “I keep telling him—” nodding to the urn— “that he ought to pay it, but he won’t do a thing about it. Maybe you can talk some sense into him?” Then she plunked down the Death Certificate and started to cry.
This takes the basic situation and illustrates it to the point of the ridiculous.
It has been suggested that the problem with contracts is the language and the grammar used and that we can overcome the difficulty by reducing language to its most basic mathematical content and adhering to rigid mathematical rules of grammar construction to do away with “adverb-verb” language and thus avoid endless arguments over what “quickly” or “dutifully” means.
This Parse-Syntax Grammar has been widely accepted in theory and I admit that there is a mathematical interface inherent in language that results naturally from the parts of language we employ and string together to communicate, but it isn’t any answer to the basic problem which is the fraudulent nature of all contracts and our inability to disclose them adequately even if we could guarantee their enforcement—which owing to “time and unforeseen circumstance” in King Solomon’s words—we can’t.
Instead, what I see is an 8,000 year-old history of pretending that contracts are valid and giving their interpretation and enforcement over to an elite group of priests or scholars who always use an unintelligible special language to bamboozle and manipulate and hide their fraud from the general populace.
Most recently this has been demonstrated by the American Bar Association in concert with the International Bar Association using “Legalese” and special “legal terms” and special “definitions” often buried in reams and reams of unintelligible gobbledygook like the Internal Revenue Manual.
That the resulting abuses are purposeful and intentional is adequately proven by the great care with which the various traps have been laid and misrepresented, such as the action of the Congress in 1862 to arbitrarily redefine the meaning of the single word “person” to mean “corporation” and their similar action in 1864 to redefine the words “state, State, and United States” to mean “District of Columbia Municipal Corporation”.
The problem isn’t the language. The problem is the basic dishonesty and greed and nastiness of the men misusing language, and the same would be true of any mathematical language, too. Whether we use letters or numbers or any other symbols, all languages are vulnerable to the same sorts of manipulation and changes and interpretations.
We can’t change “the World” until we recognize the Truth and change ourselves.
The actual problem with contracts lies in the fact of our mortality and our inability to guarantee performance due to many factors that change our circumstance and expectations and abilities day to day. Consider the insanity of signing a piece of paper saying what you are going to do for the next thirty years when you can guarantee what you will do for the next thirty minutes?
The further problem is in our inability to fully express and document what we know, what we intend, what we mean, and what we believe at any given moment in the form of words or symbols of any kind. Just try telling someone how much you love them and why.
We aim at meaning and sometimes we come close. We can’t make contracts, can’t reasonably enforce contracts on each other, we are being bamboozled by all those who claim otherwise and we are also are being senselessly subjected to cruel and unreasoning punishment by bill collectors, revenue agents, and commercial mercenaries profiting from this racketeering, falsehood, and criminality—- which is being protected by bankers, lawyers, politicians, and even some members of the clergy.
To make it all that much worse, that much more inexcusable, we have seen these same evils many times before. Press-ganging was outlawed 200 years ago for a reason. Debtors prisons were outlawed in England in the 19th century for a reason. Enslavement and peonage have been outlawed worldwide since 1926 for a reason.
Take those reasons to heart and champion them with thought, word, and deed. Make it your mission in life to speak and uphold the Truth. Never tolerate lies and self-interest when you have means and breath to oppose it, never accept racketeering and bullying under Color of Law, never give your consent to injustice, criminality, or falsehood of any kind. Strive always to see clearly, act rightly, feel deeply, and use your common sense as these are your safeguards in a “world” in which bankers make idols out of nothing and sell men’s souls and labor in “equitable exchange” for paper, in which professional Liars pretend to dispense Justice, and venal politicians convince you that they represent you and your country.
Judge Anna Maria Riezinger
Alaska State Superior Court


Thanks to: http://scannedretina.com

Sponsored content



Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum