OUT OF MIND
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Latest topics
» Is it possible to apply positive + in favor Newton III Motion Law as a dynamic system in a motor engine
Couple Forced to Destroy 40yo Pond on Their Own Property Because Govt Owns the Rainwater EmptySat Mar 23, 2024 11:33 pm by globalturbo

» Meta 1 Coin Scam Update - Robert Dunlop Arrested
Couple Forced to Destroy 40yo Pond on Their Own Property Because Govt Owns the Rainwater EmptySat Mar 23, 2024 12:14 am by RamblerNash

» As We Navigate Debs Passing
Couple Forced to Destroy 40yo Pond on Their Own Property Because Govt Owns the Rainwater EmptyMon Jan 08, 2024 6:18 pm by Ponee

» 10/7 — Much More Dangerous & Diabolical Than Anyone Knows
Couple Forced to Destroy 40yo Pond on Their Own Property Because Govt Owns the Rainwater EmptyThu Nov 02, 2023 8:30 pm by KennyL

» Sundays and Deb.....
Couple Forced to Destroy 40yo Pond on Their Own Property Because Govt Owns the Rainwater EmptySun Oct 01, 2023 9:11 pm by NanneeRose

» African Official Exposes Bill Gates’ Depopulation Agenda: ‘My Country Is Not Your Laboratory’
Couple Forced to Destroy 40yo Pond on Their Own Property Because Govt Owns the Rainwater EmptyThu Sep 21, 2023 4:39 am by NanneeRose

» DEBS HEALTH
Couple Forced to Destroy 40yo Pond on Their Own Property Because Govt Owns the Rainwater EmptySun Sep 03, 2023 10:23 am by ANENRO

» Attorney Reveals the “Exculpatory” Evidence Jack Smith Possesses that Exonerates President Trump
Couple Forced to Destroy 40yo Pond on Their Own Property Because Govt Owns the Rainwater EmptyTue Aug 29, 2023 10:48 am by ANENRO

» Update From Site Owner to Members & Guests
Couple Forced to Destroy 40yo Pond on Their Own Property Because Govt Owns the Rainwater EmptyTue Aug 29, 2023 10:47 am by ANENRO

» New global internet censorship began today
Couple Forced to Destroy 40yo Pond on Their Own Property Because Govt Owns the Rainwater EmptyMon Aug 21, 2023 9:25 am by NanneeRose

» Alienated from reality
Couple Forced to Destroy 40yo Pond on Their Own Property Because Govt Owns the Rainwater EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 4:29 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Why does Russia now believe that Covid-19 was a US-created bioweapon?
Couple Forced to Destroy 40yo Pond on Their Own Property Because Govt Owns the Rainwater EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 4:27 pm by PurpleSkyz

»  Man reports history of interaction with seemingly intelligent orbs
Couple Forced to Destroy 40yo Pond on Their Own Property Because Govt Owns the Rainwater EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:34 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Western reactions to the controversial Benin Bronzes
Couple Forced to Destroy 40yo Pond on Their Own Property Because Govt Owns the Rainwater EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:29 pm by PurpleSkyz

» India unveils first images from Moon mission
Couple Forced to Destroy 40yo Pond on Their Own Property Because Govt Owns the Rainwater EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:27 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Scientists achieve nuclear fusion net energy gain for second time
Couple Forced to Destroy 40yo Pond on Their Own Property Because Govt Owns the Rainwater EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:25 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Putin Signals 5G Ban
Couple Forced to Destroy 40yo Pond on Their Own Property Because Govt Owns the Rainwater EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:07 pm by PurpleSkyz

» “Texas Student Dies in Car Accident — Discovers Life after Death”
Couple Forced to Destroy 40yo Pond on Their Own Property Because Govt Owns the Rainwater EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:05 pm by PurpleSkyz

» The hidden history taught by secret societies
Couple Forced to Destroy 40yo Pond on Their Own Property Because Govt Owns the Rainwater EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:03 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Vaccines and SIDS (Crib Death)
Couple Forced to Destroy 40yo Pond on Their Own Property Because Govt Owns the Rainwater EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:00 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Sun blasts out highest-energy radiation ever recorded, raising questions for solar physics
Couple Forced to Destroy 40yo Pond on Their Own Property Because Govt Owns the Rainwater EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 2:29 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Why you should be eating more porcini mushrooms
Couple Forced to Destroy 40yo Pond on Their Own Property Because Govt Owns the Rainwater EmptySun Aug 06, 2023 10:38 am by PurpleSkyz


You are not connected. Please login or register

Couple Forced to Destroy 40yo Pond on Their Own Property Because Govt Owns the Rainwater

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

PurpleSkyz

PurpleSkyz
Admin

Couple Forced to Destroy 40yo Pond on Their Own Property Because Govt Owns the Rainwater
Claire Bernish December 26, 2016


Butte Falls, OR — An Oregon couple has been told they must destroy a 2-acre pond on their land — the property’s most attractive feature — because the government said so.
Although Jon and Sabrina Carey purchased the 10-acre property near Butte Falls two and a half years ago, the pond has been in place for 40 years — but that fact doesn’t matter to the Jackson County Watermaster’s Office.
“I basically bought a lemon,” said Jon, who became teary-eyed at the edge of the partially ice-covered body of water being targeted by government, in an interview with the Mail Tribune. “That’s how they explained it to me.”
But the couple desperately wants to keep the stunning longstanding feature in tact, so, as the Mail Tribune reports, the Careys have “pleaded with the Medford Water Commission to adopt the pond and treat it as a municipal water source, something Jackson County Watermaster Larry Menteer has opposed because of the precedent it would set.
“The Water Commission has rights to the watershed around the Careys’ property, where dozens, if not hundreds, of ponds are located, as well as Medford’s primary source of water, Big Butte Springs.”
And the Careys aren’t the only people in the watershed who’ve had difficulties with, well, ‘the government’s’ water.
Eagle Point resident Gary Harrington spent 90 days in jail for illegally harboring some 13 million gallons of illicit rainwater — that’s enough rain to fill around 20 Olympic-sized swimming pools.
Harrington masterfully crafted several ponds on his property — even building docks for one, and stocking it with largemouth bass — but his insistence the water would assist in fire control and prevention didn’t satisfy the government, since a “1925 state law dictates that the water belongs to the Medford Water Commission.”
As Mother Nature Network’s Matt Hickman reported in 2012,
“The bigger story here is that rainwater collection is indeed kosher in Oregon, provided that you’re capturing it from an artificial, impervious surface such as a rooftop with the assistance of rainwater barrels. But an extensive reservoir set-up complete with 10- and 20-foot-tall dams is verboten without the proper, state-issued water-right permits — after all, Oregon law dictates that water is a publicly owned resource — and Harrington did not possess said permits.”
Harrington and the Oregon Water Resources Department waged an extended battle over the ponds, and at one point, it was ruled he would be allowed to keep everything in place — but that decision was backtracked in less than one year.
Ultimately, “Rain Man,” as he came to be called, found himself charged with nine misdemeanors, spent three months behind bars, and had to shell out $1,500 in fines — and was ordered to destroy the dams and drain all the ponds.
Harrington’s case might have been infinitely more complex than the Careys’ — considering the large volume of water and infrastructure he’d put in place — but they share the same theme of overbearing government and arguably wholly unnecessary law versus the right of people to do as they please with their property.
“When you’re honest, they take everything away from you,” said Sabrina Carey, who inspected country records — which plainly showed the pond — before they purchased the property.
Going by the book might have been the ‘fatal’ error for the couple, however, since the county didn’t take issue with the pond until Jon sought to grow legal medical cannabis on the land and had to prove there was a viable source of water for the grow operation.
According to the Watermaster’s Office, the previous owners had not received a permit for the pond, so the Careys were now in violation of Oregon regulations — and they would have to shoulder the cost of draining the water.
In an effort to prove the pond is legitimate and persuade county government to allow it to remain on the property, the couple stopped using it — even though the well on their land had run dry — and began shipping in the water for daily living and gardening from nearly Butte Falls.
They’ve also had no choice but to hire attorney Sarah Liljefelt, who filed a request with Jackson County to provide a permit for them to store water, stating, “The reservoir on Ms. Carey’s property, though small, is one of the largest in the area.”
As the Mail Tribune notes, “Liljefelt said the pond is an important source of water for beavers, otters, elk, deer, bear, mountain lion, bobcat, bald eagle osprey, great blue heron, snowy egret, Canada geese and the western pond turtle.”
By all appearances, the large pool of water does more good for the environment than if it weren’t there at all — during their fight with the State, the Careys even suggested it be used for fire control and prevention, like Harrington did, as the pond is easily accessible by fire crews.
But the county has displayed only nonsensical obstinance on the issue.
“This pond seems to be doing way more public good than not being here. Why, now, is it so important to be removed?” Jon lamented.
Indeed, the 40-year-old man doesn’t even profit from the medical cannabis grown on the land he and his wife own, as he literally gives the crop — free of charge — to friends.
“I don’t make anything out of this,” he said.
Members of the Water Commission disagree on whether this is an issue worth fighting over at all, but as the Mail Tribune reports,
“Water Commission staff found several problems with the Careys’ request, including setting a precedent that could prompt similar requests and weaken state statutes while not meeting the definition of ‘municipal water source.’ The staff found it would be very difficult to access the water stored in the pond for municipal reasons, and further monitoring and following up on compliance issues would be difficult and costly for the commission.”


Thanks to Claire at: http://thefreethoughtproject.com

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum