A series of challenges from the committee for the Government of The United States of America

A series of challenges from the committee for the Government of The United States of America

January 19, 2017   INTERNATIONAL-PUBLIC-LEGAL NOTICES, Public Notices

---

---

1) Prove there is a President of the United States of America.
2) Prove that the President of the United States does not issue executive orders in the name of the President of the United States of America.
3) If the President of the United States does issue said orders in the name of the President of the United States of America, prove the President of the United States is not acting in the capacity of a Commander-in-chief over the United States of America.
4) Prove that challenges 1, 2 and 3 do not demonstrate that the States of the Union are not under Military occupation as the States of the Union do not have a civilian president under the constitution of the United States or the constitution of the United States of America or the constitution for the United States or the constitution for the United States of America. Further, that the constitution of the United States is not designed to impose military occupation by its framers.
5) Prove the Lieber Code does not apply to military occupations by the Commander-in-chief of the United States of America and also prove that supporting a Military occupation of the States of the Union does not support a foreign military force against the country(s) known as The United States of America.
6) Prove that military occupancy does not violate the charter or any part of the charter of the Organization of American States, or the charter of the United Nations that being parts of the Law of Nations.
7) Prove that the People of the United States had the full authority to establish and ordain a constitution for the United States of America.
Keep in mind that if anyone of these challenges are true, the United States has been operating illegally for over 240 years and was designed specifically as a Military occupation force against any international entity that decided to contract under those terms. The framers of the constitution of the United States designed it so that the States of the Union never had a civilian president and therefore remained under a Military commander and the oppression of an Executive Order. Any law or act passed by force is null and void in international law because it was the will of the Commander in Chief alone that made the law and signed it. 
01-19-2017
Thanks to: http://reignoftheheavens.com

Well there's a bucket of worms for sure... is this a trick question ?   :headscratching