OUT OF MIND
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Latest topics
» Is it possible to apply positive + in favor Newton III Motion Law as a dynamic system in a motor engine
Table 1: Statutory v. Constitutional Contexts & Table 2: Effect of Domicile on Citizenship Status EmptySat Mar 23, 2024 11:33 pm by globalturbo

» Meta 1 Coin Scam Update - Robert Dunlop Arrested
Table 1: Statutory v. Constitutional Contexts & Table 2: Effect of Domicile on Citizenship Status EmptySat Mar 23, 2024 12:14 am by RamblerNash

» As We Navigate Debs Passing
Table 1: Statutory v. Constitutional Contexts & Table 2: Effect of Domicile on Citizenship Status EmptyMon Jan 08, 2024 6:18 pm by Ponee

» 10/7 — Much More Dangerous & Diabolical Than Anyone Knows
Table 1: Statutory v. Constitutional Contexts & Table 2: Effect of Domicile on Citizenship Status EmptyThu Nov 02, 2023 8:30 pm by KennyL

» Sundays and Deb.....
Table 1: Statutory v. Constitutional Contexts & Table 2: Effect of Domicile on Citizenship Status EmptySun Oct 01, 2023 9:11 pm by NanneeRose

» African Official Exposes Bill Gates’ Depopulation Agenda: ‘My Country Is Not Your Laboratory’
Table 1: Statutory v. Constitutional Contexts & Table 2: Effect of Domicile on Citizenship Status EmptyThu Sep 21, 2023 4:39 am by NanneeRose

» DEBS HEALTH
Table 1: Statutory v. Constitutional Contexts & Table 2: Effect of Domicile on Citizenship Status EmptySun Sep 03, 2023 10:23 am by ANENRO

» Attorney Reveals the “Exculpatory” Evidence Jack Smith Possesses that Exonerates President Trump
Table 1: Statutory v. Constitutional Contexts & Table 2: Effect of Domicile on Citizenship Status EmptyTue Aug 29, 2023 10:48 am by ANENRO

» Update From Site Owner to Members & Guests
Table 1: Statutory v. Constitutional Contexts & Table 2: Effect of Domicile on Citizenship Status EmptyTue Aug 29, 2023 10:47 am by ANENRO

» New global internet censorship began today
Table 1: Statutory v. Constitutional Contexts & Table 2: Effect of Domicile on Citizenship Status EmptyMon Aug 21, 2023 9:25 am by NanneeRose

» Alienated from reality
Table 1: Statutory v. Constitutional Contexts & Table 2: Effect of Domicile on Citizenship Status EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 4:29 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Why does Russia now believe that Covid-19 was a US-created bioweapon?
Table 1: Statutory v. Constitutional Contexts & Table 2: Effect of Domicile on Citizenship Status EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 4:27 pm by PurpleSkyz

»  Man reports history of interaction with seemingly intelligent orbs
Table 1: Statutory v. Constitutional Contexts & Table 2: Effect of Domicile on Citizenship Status EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:34 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Western reactions to the controversial Benin Bronzes
Table 1: Statutory v. Constitutional Contexts & Table 2: Effect of Domicile on Citizenship Status EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:29 pm by PurpleSkyz

» India unveils first images from Moon mission
Table 1: Statutory v. Constitutional Contexts & Table 2: Effect of Domicile on Citizenship Status EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:27 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Scientists achieve nuclear fusion net energy gain for second time
Table 1: Statutory v. Constitutional Contexts & Table 2: Effect of Domicile on Citizenship Status EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:25 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Putin Signals 5G Ban
Table 1: Statutory v. Constitutional Contexts & Table 2: Effect of Domicile on Citizenship Status EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:07 pm by PurpleSkyz

» “Texas Student Dies in Car Accident — Discovers Life after Death”
Table 1: Statutory v. Constitutional Contexts & Table 2: Effect of Domicile on Citizenship Status EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:05 pm by PurpleSkyz

» The hidden history taught by secret societies
Table 1: Statutory v. Constitutional Contexts & Table 2: Effect of Domicile on Citizenship Status EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:03 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Vaccines and SIDS (Crib Death)
Table 1: Statutory v. Constitutional Contexts & Table 2: Effect of Domicile on Citizenship Status EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 3:00 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Sun blasts out highest-energy radiation ever recorded, raising questions for solar physics
Table 1: Statutory v. Constitutional Contexts & Table 2: Effect of Domicile on Citizenship Status EmptyMon Aug 07, 2023 2:29 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Why you should be eating more porcini mushrooms
Table 1: Statutory v. Constitutional Contexts & Table 2: Effect of Domicile on Citizenship Status EmptySun Aug 06, 2023 10:38 am by PurpleSkyz


You are not connected. Please login or register

OUT OF MIND » VOICES CARRY » HOW TO BEAT THE SYSTEM » Table 1: Statutory v. Constitutional Contexts & Table 2: Effect of Domicile on Citizenship Status

Table 1: Statutory v. Constitutional Contexts & Table 2: Effect of Domicile on Citizenship Status

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

PurpleSkyz

PurpleSkyz
Admin

Table 1: Statutory v. Constitutional Contexts

Posted on February 9, 2015 by David Robinson

 
It is very important to understand that there are TWO separate, distinct, and mutually exclusive contexts in which geographical “words of art” can be used at the federal or national level: 


  1. Constitutional.
  2. Statutory.

The purpose of providing a statutory definition of a legal “term” is to supersede and not enlarge the ordinary, common law, constitutional, or common meaning of a term. Geographical words of art include: 

  1. “State”
  2. “United States”
  3. “alien”
  4. “citizen”
  5. “resident”
  6. “U.S. person”

The terms “State” and “United States” within the Constitution implies the constitutional states of the Union and excludes federal territory, statutory “States” (federal territories), or the statutory “United States” (the collection of all federal territory).
 

This is an outcome of the separation of powers doctrine. 
See: Government Conspiracy to Destroy the Separation of Powers, Form #05.023 http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm
The U.S. Constitution creates a public trust which is the delegation of authority order that the U.S. Government uses manage federal territory and property. That property includes franchises, such as the “trade or business” franchise. All statutory civil law it creates can and does regulate only THAT property and not the constitutional States, which are foreign, sovereign, and statutory “aliens” for the purposes of federal legislative jurisdiction. It is very important to realize the consequences of this constitutional separation of powers between the states and national government. Some of these consequences include the following: 


  1. Statutory “States” as indicated in 4 U.S.C. §110(d) and “States” in nearly all federal statutes are in fact federal territories and the definition does NOT include constitutional states of the Union.
  2. The statutory “United States” defined in 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(9) and (a)(10) and 4 USC §110(d) includes federal territory and excludes any land within the exclusive jurisdiction of a constitutional state of the Union.
  3. Terms on government forms assume the statutory context and NOT the constitutional context.
  4. Domicile is the origin of civil legislative jurisdiction over human beings. This jurisdiction is called “in personam jurisdiction”.
  5. Since the separation of powers doctrinecreates two separate jurisdictions that are legislatively “foreign” in relation to each other, then there are TWO types of political communities, two types of “citizens”, and two types of jurisdictions exercised by the national government.
    “It is clear that Congress, as a legislative body, exercise two species of legislative power: the one, limited as to its objects, but extending all over the Union: the other, an absolute, exclusive legislative power over the District of Columbia. The preliminary inquiry in the case now before the Court, is, by virtue of which of these authorities was the law in question passed?” [Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. 264, 6 Wheat. 265; 5 L.Ed. 257 (1821)]

  6. A human being domiciled in a state and born or naturalized anywhere in the Union is a statutory “alien” in relation to the national government and a non-citizen national pursuant to 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(21) and 8 U.S.C. §1452.
  7. You can be a statutory “alien” pursuant to 8 CFR §1.1441-1(c )(3)(i) and a constitutional or Fourteenth Amendment “Citizen” AT THE SAME TIME. Why? Because the Supreme Court ruled in Hooven and Allison v. Evatt, 324 U.S. 653 (1945), that there are THREE different and mutually exclusive “United States”, and therefore THREE types of “citizens of the United States”. Here is an example:
    “The 1st section of the 14th article [Fourteenth Amendment], to which our attention is more specifically invited, opens with a definition of citizenship—not only citizenship of the United States
    8. [***], but citizenship of the states. No such definition was previously found in the Constitution, nor had any attempt been made to define it by act of Congress. It had been the occasion of much discussion in the courts, by the executive departments and in the public journals. It had been said by eminent judges that no man was a citizen of the [***] except as he was a citizen of one of the states composing the Union. Those therefore, who had been born and resided always in the District of Columbia or in the territories [STATUTORY citizens], though within the United States
  8. , were not [CONSTITUTIONAL] citizens.
  9. ” [Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) 36, 21 L.Ed. 394(1873)]








  • The “citizen of the United States” mentioned in the Fourteenth Amendment is a constitutional “citizen of the United States”, and the term “United States” in that context includes states of the Union and excludes federal territory. Hence, you would NOT be a “citizen of the United States” within any federal statute, because all such statutes define “United States” to mean federal territory and EXCLUDE states of the Union. For more details, see:
    Why You are a “national”, “state national”, and Constitutional but not Statutory Citizen, Form #05.006http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm


  • Your job, if you say you are a “citizen of the United States” or “U.S. citizen” on a government form        ( a VERY DANGEROUS undertaking!) is to understand that all government forms presume the statutory and not constitutional context, and to ensure that you define precisely WHICH one of the three “United States” you are a “citizen” of, and do so in a way that excludes you from the civil jurisdiction of the national government because domiciled in a “foreign state”. Both foreign countries and states of the Union are legislatively “foreign” and therefore “foreign states” in relation to the national government of the United States. The following form does that very carefully:
    Affidavit of Citizenship, Domicile, and Tax Status, Form #02.001 http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm

  • Even the IRS says you CANNOT trust or rely on ANYTHING on any of their forms and publications. We cover this in our Reasonable Belief About Income Tax Liability, Form #05.007. Hence, if you are compelled to fill out a government form, you have an OBLIGATION to ensure that you define all “words of art” used on the form in such a way that there is no room for presumption, no judicial or government discretion to “interpret” the form to their benefit, and no injury to your rights or status by filling out the government form. This includes attaching the following forms to all tax forms you submit:9.1. Affidavit of Citizenship, Domicile, and Tax Status, Form #02.001 http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm9.2. Tax Form Attachment, Form #04.201http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm 

    • http://tats2minnews.tatsrevolution.com/post/2015/01/15/copy-this-below-and-share-it-with-everyone-you-know-district-of-columbia-act-of-1871


    Thanks to: http://mainerepublicemailalert.com



    Last edited by PurpleSkyz on Mon Feb 09, 2015 3:26 pm; edited 1 time in total

    PurpleSkyz

    PurpleSkyz
    Admin

    Table 2: Effect of Domicile on Citizenship Status

    Posted on February 9, 2015 by David Robinson
    CONDITION
    DescriptionDomicile WITHIN the FEDERAL ZONE and located in FEDERAL ZONEDomicile WITHIN the FEDERAL ZONE and temporarily located abroad in foreign countryDomicile WITHOUT the FEDERAL ZONE and located WITHOUT the FEDERAL ZONE
    Location of domicile“United States” per 26 U.S.C. §§7701(a)(9) and (a)(10), 7701(a)(39), 7408(d), and 4 U.S.C. §110(d)“United States” per 26 U.S.C. §§7701(a)(9) and (a)(10), 7701(a)(39), 7408(d), and 4 U.S.C. §110(d)Without the “United States” per 26 U.S.C. §§7701(a)(9) and (a)(10), 7701(a)(39),7408(d), and 4 U.S.C. §110(d)
    Physical locationFederal territories, possessions, and the District of ColumbiaForeign nations ONLY (NOT states of the Union)Foreign nations states of the Union Federal possessions
    Tax Status“U.S. Person” 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(30)“U.S. Person” 26 U.S.C. §7701(a)(30)“Nonresident alien”26 U.S.C. §7701(b)(1)(B)
    Tax form(s) to fileIRS Form 1040IRS Form 1040 plus 2555IRS Form 1040NR: “alien individuals”, “nonresident alien individuals” No filing requirement: “non-citizen nationals”
    Status if DOMESTIC nationalCitizen 8 U.S.C. §1401 (Not required to file if physically present in the “United States” because no statute requires it)Citizen abroad 26 U.S.C. §911 (Meets presence test)“non-citizen National” 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(21) 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(22)(B) 8 U.S.C. §1408 8 U.S.C. §1452
    Status if FOREIGN national“Resident alien” 26 U.S.C. §7701(b)(1)(A)“Resident alien abroad” 26 U.S.C. §911 (Meets presence test)“Nonresident alien individual”: 26 CFR §1.1441-1(c )(3)(ii) “Alien”: 8 U.S.C. §1101(a)(3) “Alien individual”: 26 CFR §1.1441-1(c )(3)(i)
    NOTES: 

    [list=white-space:normal;word-spacing:0;text-transform:none;letter-spacing:normal;line-height:normal;background-color:#f6f6f6;text-indent:0;]
    [*]“United States” is statutorily defined as federal territory within 26 U.S.C. §§7701(a)(9) and (a)(10), 7701(a)(39), and 7408(d), and 4 U.S.C. §110(d). It does not expressly include any Constitutional state of the Union and therefore, by the rules of statutory construction, they are purposefully excluded.
    [*]The “District of Columbia” is defined as a federal corporation but not a physical place, a “body politic”, or a de jure “government” within the District of Columbia Act of 1871, 16 Stat. 419, 426, Sec. 34. See: Corporatization and Privatization of the Government, Form #05.024; http://sedm.org/Forms/FormIndex.htm.
    [*]American nationals who are domiciled outside of federal jurisdiction, either in a state of the Union or a foreign country, are “nationals” but not “citizens” under federal law. They also qualify as “nonresident aliens” under 26 U.S.C. §7701(b)(1)(B). See sections 4.11.2 of the Great IRS Hoax for details.
    [*]Temporary domicile in the middle column on the right must meet the requirements of the “Presence test” documented in IRS publications.
    [*]“FEDERAL ZONE”=District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the territories and insular possessions of the United States in the above table.
    [*]The term “individual” as used on the IRS form 1040 means an “alien” engaged in a “trade or business”. All “taxpayers” are “aliens” engaged in a “trade or business”. This is confirmed by 26 CFR §1.1441-1(c )(3), 26 CFR §1.1-1(a)(2)(ii), and 5 U.S.C. §552a(a)(2). Statutory “U.S. citizens” as defined in 8 U.S.C. §1401 are not “individuals” unless temporarily abroad pursuant to 26 U.S.C. §911 and subject to an income tax treaty with a foreign country. In that capacity, statutory “U.S. citizens” interface to the I.R.C. as “aliens” rather than “U.S. citizens” through the tax treaty.
    [/list]
    http://tats2minnews.tatsrevolution.com/post/2015/01/15/copy-this-below-and-share-it-with-everyone-you-know-district-of-columbia-act-of-1871

    Share this:


    Thanks to: http://mainerepublicemailalert.com

    Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

    OUT OF MIND » VOICES CARRY » HOW TO BEAT THE SYSTEM » Table 1: Statutory v. Constitutional Contexts & Table 2: Effect of Domicile on Citizenship Status

    Permissions in this forum:
    You cannot reply to topics in this forum