OUT OF MIND
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Latest topics
» Gas Prices Hit $4 A Gallon In Every State For First Time
The standard model of particle physics may be broken EmptyToday at 11:42 am by PurpleSkyz

» The Cryptocurrency Crash Is Great News For The Rest of The World. Here's Why
The standard model of particle physics may be broken EmptyToday at 11:26 am by PurpleSkyz

» UFO hearing: 400 cases remain 'unidentified'
The standard model of particle physics may be broken EmptyToday at 11:22 am by PurpleSkyz

» Nestle is airlifting baby formula to the US from the Netherlands and Switzerland
The standard model of particle physics may be broken EmptyToday at 11:14 am by PurpleSkyz

» GASP!!!! ‘Good Morning America’ Admits Covid Booster Shots Can Cause AIDS
The standard model of particle physics may be broken EmptyToday at 11:11 am by PurpleSkyz

» Thai govt gives away 1,000,000 cannabis plants, encourages citizens to grow NATURAL medicine
The standard model of particle physics may be broken EmptyToday at 10:49 am by PurpleSkyz

» Good People Doing Good Things —
The standard model of particle physics may be broken EmptyToday at 10:43 am by PurpleSkyz

» Statistical analysis shows that NOBODY under 60 should take the COVID vaccine
The standard model of particle physics may be broken EmptyToday at 10:32 am by PurpleSkyz

» Covid Case/Hosp/Death Rates now highest among Triple Vaxxed in Canada
The standard model of particle physics may be broken EmptyToday at 10:28 am by PurpleSkyz

» Deadly Immunity – Government Cover-up of a Mercury/Autism Scandal
The standard model of particle physics may be broken EmptyToday at 10:19 am by PurpleSkyz

» Who made these circles in the Sahara?
The standard model of particle physics may be broken EmptyYesterday at 11:55 am by PurpleSkyz

» Military Shows New UFO Videos to Congress
The standard model of particle physics may be broken EmptyYesterday at 11:50 am by PurpleSkyz

» Why Human DNA Might Be The Product of Another Intelligence
The standard model of particle physics may be broken EmptyYesterday at 10:41 am by PurpleSkyz

» 5G Health Effects Testimony to Mitchell South Dakota Council May 2022
The standard model of particle physics may be broken EmptyYesterday at 10:30 am by PurpleSkyz

» The Ghostly Sounds of Auroras Can Be Heard, Even When They're Invisible
The standard model of particle physics may be broken EmptyYesterday at 9:34 am by PurpleSkyz

» RFK, Jr. to Speak at May 19 ‘Humanity Against Censorship’ Rally
The standard model of particle physics may be broken EmptyYesterday at 9:28 am by PurpleSkyz

» Biden Health Secretary Says He Knew About Baby Formula Crisis Last Year
The standard model of particle physics may be broken EmptyYesterday at 9:15 am by PurpleSkyz

» Rheumatologist: 40% of my 3,000 vaxxed patients reported injury
The standard model of particle physics may be broken EmptyYesterday at 9:10 am by PurpleSkyz

»  The Journey to #OceanStewardship - Natreve x Plastic Bank
The standard model of particle physics may be broken EmptyYesterday at 1:04 am by PurpleSkyz

»  Baby formula factory Abbott and FDA reach agreement to restart production
The standard model of particle physics may be broken EmptyYesterday at 12:56 am by PurpleSkyz

» Do you know someone who died between Mar and December 2020?
The standard model of particle physics may be broken EmptyYesterday at 12:44 am by PurpleSkyz

» 2000 Felons and Zero Justice
The standard model of particle physics may be broken EmptyMon May 16, 2022 9:33 am by PurpleSkyz

You are not connected. Please login or register

OUT OF MIND » TRUTH IN CONSPIRACY THEORIES? » CERN LHC » The standard model of particle physics may be broken

The standard model of particle physics may be broken

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

PurpleSkyz

PurpleSkyz
Admin

The standard model of particle physics may be broken
May 9, 2022

The standard model of particle physics may be broken News-hadron-tunnel

 Image Credit: CC BY-SA 3.0 Julian Herzog
Prof Roger Jones - who works at the Large Hadron Collider at Cern - looks at the future of physics discoveries.
As a physicist working at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at Cern, one of the most frequent questions I am asked is "When are you going to find something?". Resisting the temptation to sarcastically reply "Aside from the Higgs boson, which won the Nobel Prize, and a whole slew of new composite particles?", I realise that the reason the question is posed so often is down to how we have portrayed progress in particle physics to the wider world.

We often talk about progress in terms of discovering new particles, and it often is. Studying a new, very heavy particle helps us view underlying physical processes - often without annoying background noise. That makes it easy to explain the value of the discovery to the public and politicians.

Recently, however, a series of precise measurements of already known, bog-standard particles and processes have threatened to shake up physics. And with the LHC getting ready to run at higher energy and intensity than ever before, it is time to start discussing the implications widely.

In truth, particle physics has always proceeded in two ways, of which new particles is one. The other is by making very precise measurements that test the predictions of theories and look for deviations from what is expected.

The early evidence for Einstein's theory of general relativity, for example, came from discovering small deviations in the apparent positions of stars and from the motion of Mercury in its orbit.

Three key findings

Particles obey a counter-intuitive but hugely successful theory called quantum mechanics. This theory shows that particles far too massive to be made directly in a lab collision can still influence what other particles do (through something called "quantum fluctuations"). Measurements of such effects are very complex, however, and much harder to explain to the public.

But recent results hinting at unexplained new physics beyond the standard model are of this second type. Detailed studies from the LHCb experiment found that a particle known as a beauty quark (quarks make up the protons and neutrons in the atomic nucleus) "decays" (falls apart) into an electron much more often than into a muon - the electron's heavier, but otherwise identical, sibling. According to the standard model, this shouldn't happen - hinting that new particles or even forces of nature may influence the process.

Intriguingly, though, measurements of similar processes involving "top quarks" from the ATLAS experiment at the LHC show this decay does happen at equal rates for electrons and muons.

Meanwhile, the Muon g-2 experiment at Fermilab in the US has recently made very precise studies of how muons "wobble" as their "spin" (a quantum property) interacts with surrounding magnetic fields. It found a small but significant deviation from some theoretical predictions - again suggesting that unknown forces or particles may be at work.

The latest surprising result is a measurement of the mass of a fundamental particle called the W boson, which carries the weak nuclear force that governs radioactive decay. After many years of data taking and analysis, the experiment, also at Fermilab, suggests it is significantly heavier than theory predicts - deviating by an amount that would not happen by chance in more than a million million experiments. Again, it may be that yet undiscovered particles are adding to its mass.

Interestingly, however, this also disagrees with some lower-precision measurements from the LHC (presented in this study and this one).
 
The verdict

While we are not absolutely certain these effects require a novel explanation, the evidence seems to be growing that some new physics is needed.

Of course, there will be almost as many new mechanisms proposed to explain these observations as there are theorists. Many will look to various forms of "supersymmetry". This is the idea that there are twice as many fundamental particles in the standard model than we thought, with each particle having a "super partner". These may involve additional Higgs bosons (associated with the field that gives fundamental particles their mass).

Others will go beyond this, invoking less recently fashionable ideas such as "technicolor", which would imply that there are additional forces of nature (in addition to gravity, electromagnetism and the weak and strong nuclear forces), and might mean that the Higgs boson is in fact a composite object made of other particles. Only experiments will reveal the truth of the matter - which is good news for experimentalists.

The experimental teams behind the new findings are all well respected and have worked on the problems for a long time. That said, it is no disrespect to them to note that these measurements are extremely difficult to make. What's more, predictions of the standard model usually require calculations where approximations have to be made. This means different theorists can predict slightly different masses and rates of decay depending on the assumptions and level of approximation made. So, it may be that when we do more accurate calculations, some of the new findings will fit with the standard model.

Equally, it may be the researchers are using subtly different interpretations and so finding inconsistent results. Comparing two experimental results requires careful checking that the same level of approximation has been used in both cases.

These are both examples of sources of "systematic uncertainty", and while all concerned do their best to quantify them, there can be unforeseen complications that under- or over-estimate them.

None of this makes the current results any less interesting or important. What the results illustrate is that there are multiple pathways to a deeper understanding of the new physics, and they all need to be explored.

With the restart of the LHC, there are still prospects of new particles being made through rarer processes or found hidden under backgrounds that we have yet to unearth.

Roger Jones, Professor of Physics, Head of Department, Lancaster University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.

Read the original article.

Source: The Conversation

https://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/news/357483/the-standard-model-of-parthttps://www.unexplained-mysteries.comicle-physics-may-be-broken
Thanks to:



  

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum