OUT OF MIND
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Latest topics
» Unalienable Rights
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyYesterday at 6:49 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Massive Perseid Meteor Shower August 11, 2020
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyYesterday at 4:32 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Strange object found in Antarctica! What is this?
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyYesterday at 4:31 pm by PurpleSkyz

» 5G, Environmental Justice, and International Policy
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyYesterday at 4:29 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Comet Breaks in Two as It's Grazing the Sun
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyYesterday at 4:28 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Experience Sudden Enlightenment – the Amazing Power of Satori Mind
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyYesterday at 4:22 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Should lithium be added to our drinking water ?
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyYesterday at 4:02 pm by PurpleSkyz

» John Cleese on the possibility of life after death
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyYesterday at 3:58 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Diamond-encrusted COVID mask sells for $1.5M
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyYesterday at 3:56 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Sacha Stone with Anna von Reitz and others
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyYesterday at 1:42 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Dr. Steven (struggling to stay relevant) Greer - Makes Contact in Charlotte
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyYesterday at 12:27 pm by PurpleSkyz

» Carrying Stones & Digging Holes August 9, 2020~Who R U: Law
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyYesterday at 12:24 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» Heated Vaccine Debate - Kennedy Jr. vs Dershowitz
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyYesterday at 12:23 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» US appeals court denies bid to resurrect Bundy standoff case
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyYesterday at 12:22 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» Supermarket Shock: Crisis In America's Food Supply | Sneak Peek | CNBC Prime
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyYesterday at 12:21 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» New Banking Block Chain USA Federal Reserve Announcement
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyYesterday at 12:19 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» The REAL LOCAL Residents of SLAB CITY Tour- (Documentary)
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyYesterday at 12:17 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» Creepy TikTok Videos You Might Not Wanna Watch At Night
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyYesterday at 12:16 pm by Consciousness Of Economic

» IDENTIFIED: Mystery Seeds from China
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyYesterday at 12:00 pm by PurpleSkyz

» #QTard Drama Theater - Did THEY Attack The White House Today? plus MORE
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyYesterday at 11:41 am by PurpleSkyz

» Chilling Details Emerge About White House Shooting After Gunman Is Taken Down
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyYesterday at 11:27 am by PurpleSkyz

» BBC News London Surrey Wildfires 10 August 2020
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyYesterday at 11:18 am by PurpleSkyz

» UFO News ~ Long Interstellar Spacecraft Spotted Flying Behind Sun in Solar System - "Real McCoy" plus MORE
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyYesterday at 11:16 am by PurpleSkyz

» Australian Professor: Ivermectin ‘Amazingly Successful’ in Killing Coronavirus
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyYesterday at 10:59 am by PurpleSkyz

» Police State Australia
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyYesterday at 10:50 am by PurpleSkyz

» Mainstream Media and Science Exposes COVID-19 as a Hoax
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyYesterday at 10:49 am by PurpleSkyz

» Dave Schmidt - Meta 1 Coin - Sgt Shultz 2020!
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyYesterday at 1:43 am by RamblerNash

» PRESIDENT TRUMP LEFT THE BRIEFING AS SHOTS OUTSIDE ARE HEARD
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyMon Aug 10, 2020 6:49 pm by LadyDragon

» United States Electoral College
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  EmptyMon Aug 10, 2020 12:41 pm by PurpleSkyz







***********

CLICK THE SUBSCRIBE BUTTON BELOW TO RECEIVE OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER

A 2ND EMAIL COMPLETES THE ACTIVATION PROCESS




CLICK THE PURPLE BUTTON TO VIEW OUR LATEST POSTS







You are not connected. Please login or register

OUT OF MIND » DISCLOSURE » SPACE NEWS & UFO DISCLOSURE » 1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report

1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report

Go down  Message [Page 1 of 1]

PurpleSkyz

PurpleSkyz
Admin
1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report


1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  11a9e04d65dd6081c46442bd606b87de



Viking 2 Lander photo of Martian surface in 1976
NASA

1976 life on Mars controversy resurrected in new scientific report  11021cfc2254d0243bccf714bd4a673c



A team of scientists and mathematicians analyzing data from the 1976 Viking Mission have concluded that life on Mars was detected in one of the four experiments conducted by the two robotic landers. Their report, “Complexity Analysis of the Viking Labeled Release Experiments, ” released last week in the International Journal of Aeronautical and Space Sciences has resurrected a controversy over the results of the Viking Mission’s “Labeled Released experiment” designed by Dr Gilbert Levin. The Viking mission was the only Mars mission so far that was designed by NASA to detect life. Dr Levin was confident that the experiment had detected microbial life on Mars, but his NASA colleagues disagreed and his startling finding was forgotten in the Martian sands of time. This new scientific investigation has concluded that Levin was right all along.

Wikipedia summarizes NASA’s official position on the “Labeled Released experiment” and the position taken by Levin’s colleagues back in 1976:

In the [Labeled Release] LR experiment, a sample of Martian soil was inoculated with a drop of very dilute aqueous nutrient solution. The nutrients (7 molecules that were Miller-Urey products) were tagged with radioactive 14C. The air above the soil was monitored for the evolution of radioactive 14CO2 gas as evidence that microorganisms in the soil had metabolized one or more of the nutrients.…. The result was quite a surprise following the negative results of the first two tests, with a steady stream of radioactive gases being given off by the soil immediately following the first injection. The experiment was done by both Viking probes the first using a sample from the surface exposed to sunlight and the second probe taking the sample from underneath a rock both initial injections came back positive. Subsequent injections a week later did not, however, elicit the same reaction, and the result remains inconclusive.

Here is how Irene Klotz from Discovery News described the novel approach taken by scientists in the newly released report:

Researchers crunched raw data collected during runs of the Labeled Release experiment, which looked for signs of microbial metabolism in soil samples scooped up and processed by the two Viking landers. General consensus of scientists has been that the experiment found geological, not biological, activity.
The new study took a different approach. Researchers distilled the Viking Labeled Release data, provided as hard copies by the original researchers, into sets of numbers and analyzed the results for complexity. Since living systems are more complicated than non-biological processes, the idea was to look at the experiment results from a purely numerical perspective. They found close correlations between the Viking experiment results' complexity and those of terrestrial biological data sets. They say the high degree of order is more characteristic of biological, rather than purely physical processes.


The team of scientists are very conclusive in their 2012 report :

The only extraterrestrial life detection experiments ever conducted were the three which were components of the 1976 Viking Mission to Mars. Of these, only the Labeled Release experiment obtained a clearly positive response…. We have applied complexity analysis to the Viking LR data….We conclude that the complexity pattern seen in active experiments strongly suggests biology while the different pattern in the control responses is more likely to be non-biological….These analyses support the interpretation that the Viking LR experiment did detect extant microbial life on Mars.

One of the scientists, Dr Joseph Miller a neuropharmacologist and biologist with the University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, was interviewed by Discovery News and said : "On the basis of what we've done so far, I'd say I'm 99 percent sure there's life there."

So are the results from this new scientific investigation of the Viking data conclusive, was life discovered on Mars? A 99 % degree of certainty is very high, and while critics might argue is not conclusive, it would at the very least, have required follow up life detection experiments by NASA over the last three decades. NASA however has not designed such experiments ever since the 1976 Viking Mission. Why not?

According to NASA critic, Richard Hoagload, author of Dark Mission : NASA Secret History , NASA is not interested in discovering whether life exists or has existed on Mars. Such a discovery would be too disturbing for human civilization as we know it, as starkly revealed in the 1961 NASA Brookings Report presented to the US Congress that Hoagland helped bring to public attention back in 1993. NASA’s real mission appears to be one of merely justifying funding for future space missions that do nothing to disturb the scientific consensus that we are alone in the universe. NASA data pointing to evidence of life in our solar system is systematically ignored, censored or simply disappears. Scientists challenging this policy are silenced, discredited, and/or fired. NASA’s next robotic mission, Mars Science Laboratory (aka Curiosity) again does not have any life detection experiments on board. It’s hard not to disagree with Hoagland’s conclusion that NASA’s real mission is a dark one after all – don’t do anything to prove that life exists elsewhere in our solar system. Thankfully, more and more scientists do not agree, as reevaluation of the 1976 Viking Mission data clearly shows.

© Copyright 2012. Michael E. Salla. Exopolitics.org





Life on Mars? Data From 1976 Viking Mission Re-examined
(1:07) @ https://youtu.be/esTj25tRigg



Viking robots found life on Mars in 1976?
(3:21) @ https://youtu.be/-ECi71DRRrA

For more information about Martian life see [url=http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/life on mars]http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com/search/label/life%20on%20mars[/url]


Thanks to: http://nexusilluminati.blogspot.com



  

Back to top  Message [Page 1 of 1]

Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum