Sat Mar 23, 2024 11:33 pm by globalturbo
http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/?p=4138
OBAMA ELIGIBILITY COURT CASE…BLOW BY BLOW
By Craig Andresen on January 26, 2012 at 9:25 am
Given the testimony from today’s court case in Georgia, Obama has a
lot of explaining to do. His attorney, Jablonski, was a NO SHOW as of
course, was Obama.
The following is a nutshell account of the proceedings.
Promptly at 9am EST, all attorneys involved in the Obama Georgia
eligibility case were called to the Judge’s chambers. This was indeed a
very interesting beginning to this long awaited and important case.
The case revolved around the Natural Born clause of the Constitution
and whether or not Obama qualifies under it to serve. More to the point,
if found ineligible, Obama’s name would not appear on the 2012 ballot
in Georgia.
With the small courtroom crowded, several in attendance could be seen
fanning themselves with pamphlets as they waited for the return of the
attorneys and the appearance of the judge.
Obama himself, who had been subpoenaed to appear, of course was
nowhere near Georgia. Instead, Obama was on a campaign swing appearing
in Las Vegas and in Colorado ignoring the court in Georgia.
Over the last several weeks, Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, had
attempted several tactics to keep this case from moving forward. He
first tried to have it dismissed, then argued that it was irrelevant to
Obama. After that, Jablonski argued that a state could not, under the
law, determine who would or would not be on a ballot and later, that
Obama was simply too busy with the duties of office to appear.
After all these arguments were dispatched by the Georgia Court,
Jablonski, in desperation, wrote to the Georgia Secretary of State
attempting to place Obama above the law and declared that the case was
not to he heard and neither he nor his client would participate.
Secretary of State, Brian Kemp, fired back a letter hours later
telling Jablonski he was free to abandon the case and not participate
but that he would do so at his and his clients peril.
Game on.
5 minutes.
10 minutes.
15 minutes with the attorneys in the judge’s chambers.
20 minutes.
It appears Jablonski is not in attendance as the attorneys
return, all go to the plaintiff table 24 minutes after meeting in the
judge’s chambers.
Has Obama’s attorney made good on his stated threat not to
participate? Is he directly ignoring the court’s subpoena? Is he placing
Obama above the law? It seems so. Were you or I subpoenaed to appear in
court, would we or our attorney be allowed such action or, non action?
Certainly not.
Court is called to order.
Obama’s birth certificate is entered into evidence.
Obama’s father’s place of birth, Kenya East Africa is entered into evidence.
Pages 214 and 215 from Obama’s book, “Dreams from My Father” entered
into evidence. Highlighted. This is where Obama indicates that, in 1966
or 1967 that his father’s history is mentioned. It states that his
father’s passport had been revoked and he was unable to leave Kenya.
Immigration Services documents entered into evidence regarding Obama Sr.
June 27th, 1962, is the date on those documents. Obama’s
father’s status shown as a non citizen of the United States. Documents
were gotten through the Freedom of Information Act.
Testimony regarding the definition of Natural Born Citizen is given
citing Minor vs Happersett opinion from a Supreme Court written opinion
from 1875. The attorney points out the difference between “citizen” and
“Natural Born Citizen” using charts and copies of the Minor vs
Happersett opinion.
It is also pointed out that the 14th Amendment does not
alter the definition or supersede the meaning of Natural Born. It is
pointed out that lower court rulings do not conflict with the Supreme
Court opinion nor do they over rule the Supreme Court Minor vs
Happersett opinion.
The point is, to be a natural born citizen, one must have
2 parents who, at the time of the birth in question, be citizens of the
United States. As Obama’s father was not a citizen, the argument is
that Obama, constitutionally, is ineligible to serve as President.
Judge notes that as Obama nor his attorney is present, action will be taken accordingly.
Carl Swinson takes the stand.
Testimony is presented that the SOS has agreed to hear this case,
laws applicable, and that the DNC of Georgia will be on the ballot and
the challenge to it by Swinson.
2nd witness, a Mr. Powell, takes the stand and presents
testimony regarding documents of challenge to Obama’s appearance on the
Georgia ballot and his candidacy.
Court records of Obama’s mother and father entered into evidence.
Official certificate of nomination of Obama entered into evidence.
RNC certificate of nomination entered into evidence.
DNC
language does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified while the
RNC document DOES. This shows a direct difference trying to establish
that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama was not qualified.
Jablonski letter to Kemp yesterday entered into evidence showing
their desire that these proceedings not take place and that they would
not participate.
Dreams From My Father entered.
Mr. Allen from Tuscon AZ sworn in.
Disc received from Immigration and Naturalization Service entered
into evidence. This disc contains information regarding the status of
Obama’s father received through the Freedom of Information Act.
This information states clearly that Obama’s father was NEVER a U.S. Citizen.
At this point, the judge takes a recess.
The judge returns.
David Farrar takes the stand.
Evidence showing Obama’s book of records listing his nationality as Indoneasan. Deemed not relevant by the judge.
Orly Taitz calls 2nd witness. Mr. Strump.
Enters into evidence a portion of letter received from attorney
showing a renewal form from Obama’s mother for her passport listing
Obama’s last name something other than Obama.
State Licensed PI takes the stand.
She was hired to look into Obama’s background and found a Social
Security number for him from 1977. Professional opinion given that this
number was fraudulent. The number used or attached to Obama in 1977,
shows that Obama was born in the 1890. This shows that the number was
originally assigned to someone else who was indeed born in 1890 and
should never have been used by Obama.
Same SS number came up with addresses in IL, D.C. and MA.
Next witness takes the stand.
This witness is an expert in information technology and photo shop.
He testifies that the birth certificate Obama provided to the public is
layered, multiple layered. This, he testifies, indicates that different
parts of the certificate have been lifted from more than one original
document.
Linda Jordan takes the stand.
Document entered regarding SS number assigned to Obama. SS number is
not verified under E Verify. It comes back as suspected fraudulent. This
is the system by which the Government verifies ones citizenship.
Next witness.
Mr. Gogt.
Expert in document imaging and scanners for 18 years.
Mr. Gogt testifies that the birth certificate, posted online by
Obama, is suspicious. States white lines around all the type face is
caused by “unsharp mask” in Photoshop. Testifies that any document
showing this, is considered to be a fraud.
States this is a product of layering.
Mr. Gogt testifies that a straight scan of an original document would not show such layering.
Also testifies that the date stamps shown on Obama documents should
not be in exact same place on various documents as they are hand
stamped. Obama’s documents are all even, straight and exactly the same
indicating they were NOT hand stamped by layered into the document by
computer.
Next witness, Mr. Sampson a former police officer and former immigration officer specializing in immigration fraud.
Ran Obama’s SS number through database and found that the number was
issued to Obama in 1977 in the state of Connecticut . Obama never
resided in that state. At the time of issue, Obama was living in Hawaii.
Serial number on birth certificate is out of sequence with others
issued at that hospital. Also certification is different than others and
different than twins born 24 hours ahead of Obama.
Mr. Sampson also states that portion of documents regarding Mr.
Sotoroe, who adopted Obama have been redacted which is highly unusual
with regards to immigration records
Suggests all records from Social Security, Immigration, Hawaii birth
records be made available to see if there are criminal charges to be
filed or not. Without them, nothing can be ruled out.
Mr. Sampson indicates if Obama is shown not to be a citizen,
he should be arrested and deported and until all records are released
nobody can know for sure if he is or is not a U.S. Citizen.
Taitz shows records for Barry Sotoro aka Barack Obama, showing he resides in Hawaii and in Indonesia at the same time.
Taitz takes the stand herself.
Testifies that records indicate Obama records have been altered and he is hiding his identity and citizenship.
Taitz leave the stand to make her closing arguments.
Taitz states that Obama should be found, because of the evidence presented, ineligible to serve as President.
And with that, the judge closes the hearing.
What can we take away from this?
It’s interesting.
Now, all of this has finally been entered OFFICIALLY into court records.
One huge question is now more than ever before, unanswered.
WHO THE heck IS THIS GUY?
Without his attorney present, Obama’s identity, his Social Security
number, his citizenship status, and his past are all OFFICIALLY in
question.
One thing to which there seems no doubt. He does NOT qualify, under
the definition of Natural Born Citizen” provided by SCOTUS opinions, to
be eligible to serve as President.
What will the judge decide? That is yet to be known, but it seems
nearly impossible to believe, without counter testimony or evidence,
because Obama and his attorney chose not to participate, that Obama will
be allowed on the Georgia ballot.
It also opens the door for such cases pending or to be brought in other states as well.
Obama is in it deep and the DNC has some…a LOT…of explaining to do unless they start looking for a new candidate for 2012.
OBAMA ELIGIBILITY COURT CASE…BLOW BY BLOW
By Craig Andresen on January 26, 2012 at 9:25 am
Given the testimony from today’s court case in Georgia, Obama has a
lot of explaining to do. His attorney, Jablonski, was a NO SHOW as of
course, was Obama.
The following is a nutshell account of the proceedings.
Promptly at 9am EST, all attorneys involved in the Obama Georgia
eligibility case were called to the Judge’s chambers. This was indeed a
very interesting beginning to this long awaited and important case.
The case revolved around the Natural Born clause of the Constitution
and whether or not Obama qualifies under it to serve. More to the point,
if found ineligible, Obama’s name would not appear on the 2012 ballot
in Georgia.
With the small courtroom crowded, several in attendance could be seen
fanning themselves with pamphlets as they waited for the return of the
attorneys and the appearance of the judge.
Obama himself, who had been subpoenaed to appear, of course was
nowhere near Georgia. Instead, Obama was on a campaign swing appearing
in Las Vegas and in Colorado ignoring the court in Georgia.
Over the last several weeks, Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, had
attempted several tactics to keep this case from moving forward. He
first tried to have it dismissed, then argued that it was irrelevant to
Obama. After that, Jablonski argued that a state could not, under the
law, determine who would or would not be on a ballot and later, that
Obama was simply too busy with the duties of office to appear.
After all these arguments were dispatched by the Georgia Court,
Jablonski, in desperation, wrote to the Georgia Secretary of State
attempting to place Obama above the law and declared that the case was
not to he heard and neither he nor his client would participate.
Secretary of State, Brian Kemp, fired back a letter hours later
telling Jablonski he was free to abandon the case and not participate
but that he would do so at his and his clients peril.
Game on.
5 minutes.
10 minutes.
15 minutes with the attorneys in the judge’s chambers.
20 minutes.
It appears Jablonski is not in attendance as the attorneys
return, all go to the plaintiff table 24 minutes after meeting in the
judge’s chambers.
Has Obama’s attorney made good on his stated threat not to
participate? Is he directly ignoring the court’s subpoena? Is he placing
Obama above the law? It seems so. Were you or I subpoenaed to appear in
court, would we or our attorney be allowed such action or, non action?
Certainly not.
Court is called to order.
Obama’s birth certificate is entered into evidence.
Obama’s father’s place of birth, Kenya East Africa is entered into evidence.
Pages 214 and 215 from Obama’s book, “Dreams from My Father” entered
into evidence. Highlighted. This is where Obama indicates that, in 1966
or 1967 that his father’s history is mentioned. It states that his
father’s passport had been revoked and he was unable to leave Kenya.
Immigration Services documents entered into evidence regarding Obama Sr.
June 27th, 1962, is the date on those documents. Obama’s
father’s status shown as a non citizen of the United States. Documents
were gotten through the Freedom of Information Act.
Testimony regarding the definition of Natural Born Citizen is given
citing Minor vs Happersett opinion from a Supreme Court written opinion
from 1875. The attorney points out the difference between “citizen” and
“Natural Born Citizen” using charts and copies of the Minor vs
Happersett opinion.
It is also pointed out that the 14th Amendment does not
alter the definition or supersede the meaning of Natural Born. It is
pointed out that lower court rulings do not conflict with the Supreme
Court opinion nor do they over rule the Supreme Court Minor vs
Happersett opinion.
The point is, to be a natural born citizen, one must have
2 parents who, at the time of the birth in question, be citizens of the
United States. As Obama’s father was not a citizen, the argument is
that Obama, constitutionally, is ineligible to serve as President.
Judge notes that as Obama nor his attorney is present, action will be taken accordingly.
Carl Swinson takes the stand.
Testimony is presented that the SOS has agreed to hear this case,
laws applicable, and that the DNC of Georgia will be on the ballot and
the challenge to it by Swinson.
2nd witness, a Mr. Powell, takes the stand and presents
testimony regarding documents of challenge to Obama’s appearance on the
Georgia ballot and his candidacy.
Court records of Obama’s mother and father entered into evidence.
Official certificate of nomination of Obama entered into evidence.
RNC certificate of nomination entered into evidence.
DNC
language does NOT include language stating Obama is Qualified while the
RNC document DOES. This shows a direct difference trying to establish
that the DNC MAY possibly have known that Obama was not qualified.
Jablonski letter to Kemp yesterday entered into evidence showing
their desire that these proceedings not take place and that they would
not participate.
Dreams From My Father entered.
Mr. Allen from Tuscon AZ sworn in.
Disc received from Immigration and Naturalization Service entered
into evidence. This disc contains information regarding the status of
Obama’s father received through the Freedom of Information Act.
This information states clearly that Obama’s father was NEVER a U.S. Citizen.
At this point, the judge takes a recess.
The judge returns.
David Farrar takes the stand.
Evidence showing Obama’s book of records listing his nationality as Indoneasan. Deemed not relevant by the judge.
Orly Taitz calls 2nd witness. Mr. Strump.
Enters into evidence a portion of letter received from attorney
showing a renewal form from Obama’s mother for her passport listing
Obama’s last name something other than Obama.
State Licensed PI takes the stand.
She was hired to look into Obama’s background and found a Social
Security number for him from 1977. Professional opinion given that this
number was fraudulent. The number used or attached to Obama in 1977,
shows that Obama was born in the 1890. This shows that the number was
originally assigned to someone else who was indeed born in 1890 and
should never have been used by Obama.
Same SS number came up with addresses in IL, D.C. and MA.
Next witness takes the stand.
This witness is an expert in information technology and photo shop.
He testifies that the birth certificate Obama provided to the public is
layered, multiple layered. This, he testifies, indicates that different
parts of the certificate have been lifted from more than one original
document.
Linda Jordan takes the stand.
Document entered regarding SS number assigned to Obama. SS number is
not verified under E Verify. It comes back as suspected fraudulent. This
is the system by which the Government verifies ones citizenship.
Next witness.
Mr. Gogt.
Expert in document imaging and scanners for 18 years.
Mr. Gogt testifies that the birth certificate, posted online by
Obama, is suspicious. States white lines around all the type face is
caused by “unsharp mask” in Photoshop. Testifies that any document
showing this, is considered to be a fraud.
States this is a product of layering.
Mr. Gogt testifies that a straight scan of an original document would not show such layering.
Also testifies that the date stamps shown on Obama documents should
not be in exact same place on various documents as they are hand
stamped. Obama’s documents are all even, straight and exactly the same
indicating they were NOT hand stamped by layered into the document by
computer.
Next witness, Mr. Sampson a former police officer and former immigration officer specializing in immigration fraud.
Ran Obama’s SS number through database and found that the number was
issued to Obama in 1977 in the state of Connecticut . Obama never
resided in that state. At the time of issue, Obama was living in Hawaii.
Serial number on birth certificate is out of sequence with others
issued at that hospital. Also certification is different than others and
different than twins born 24 hours ahead of Obama.
Mr. Sampson also states that portion of documents regarding Mr.
Sotoroe, who adopted Obama have been redacted which is highly unusual
with regards to immigration records
Suggests all records from Social Security, Immigration, Hawaii birth
records be made available to see if there are criminal charges to be
filed or not. Without them, nothing can be ruled out.
Mr. Sampson indicates if Obama is shown not to be a citizen,
he should be arrested and deported and until all records are released
nobody can know for sure if he is or is not a U.S. Citizen.
Taitz shows records for Barry Sotoro aka Barack Obama, showing he resides in Hawaii and in Indonesia at the same time.
Taitz takes the stand herself.
Testifies that records indicate Obama records have been altered and he is hiding his identity and citizenship.
Taitz leave the stand to make her closing arguments.
Taitz states that Obama should be found, because of the evidence presented, ineligible to serve as President.
And with that, the judge closes the hearing.
What can we take away from this?
It’s interesting.
Now, all of this has finally been entered OFFICIALLY into court records.
One huge question is now more than ever before, unanswered.
WHO THE heck IS THIS GUY?
Without his attorney present, Obama’s identity, his Social Security
number, his citizenship status, and his past are all OFFICIALLY in
question.
One thing to which there seems no doubt. He does NOT qualify, under
the definition of Natural Born Citizen” provided by SCOTUS opinions, to
be eligible to serve as President.
What will the judge decide? That is yet to be known, but it seems
nearly impossible to believe, without counter testimony or evidence,
because Obama and his attorney chose not to participate, that Obama will
be allowed on the Georgia ballot.
It also opens the door for such cases pending or to be brought in other states as well.
Obama is in it deep and the DNC has some…a LOT…of explaining to do unless they start looking for a new candidate for 2012.
